FORCE INTERNMENT CAMPS: Updated 2012 FM 3-39.40 Internment and Resettlement Operations


U.S. Army

Restricted U.S. Army Internment and Resettlement Operations Manual

May 2, 2012

FM 3-39.40 Internment and Resettlement Operations

  • 326 pages
  • Distribution authorized to the DOD and DOD contractors only to protect technical or operational information from automatic dissemination under the International Exchange Program or by other means.
  • February 12, 2010
  • 3.59 MB

Download

I/R operations facilitate the ability to conduct rapid and decisive combat operations; deter, mitigate, and defeat threats to populations that may result in conflict; reverse conditions of human suffering; and build the capacity of a foreign government to effectively care for and govern its population. This includes capabilities to conduct shaping operations across the spectrum of military operations to mitigate and defeat the underlying conditions for conflict and counter the core motivations that result in support to criminal, terrorist, insurgent, and other destabilizing groups. I/R operations also include the daily incarceration of U.S. military prisoners at facilities throughout the world.
This manual continues the evolution of the I/R function to support the changing nature of OEs. In light of persistent armed conflict and social turmoil throughout the world, the effects on populations remain a compelling issue. The world population will increase from 6 billion to 9 billion in the next two decades, with 95 percent of the growth occurring in the developing world. By 2030, 60 percent of the world’s population will live in urban areas. Coexisting demographically and ethnically, diverse societies will aggressively compete for limited resources.
Typically, overpopulated third world societies suffer from a lack of legitimate and effective enforcement mechanisms, which is generally accepted as one of the cornerstones of a stable society. Stability within a population may eliminate the need for direct military intervention. The goal of military police conducting detainee operations is to provide stability within the population, its institutions, and its infrastructure. In this rapidly changing and dynamic strategic environment, U.S. forces will compete with local populations for the same space, routes, and resources. The modular force’s ability to positively influence and shape the opinions, attitudes, and behaviors of select populations is critical to tactical, operational, and strategic success.
An adaptive enemy will manipulate populations that are hostile to U.S. intent by instigating mass civil disobedience, directing criminal activity, masking their operations in urban and other complex terrain,
maintaining an indistinguishable presence through cultural anonymity, and actively seeking the traditional sanctuary of protected areas as defined by the rules of land warfare. Such actions will facilitate the dispersal of threat forces, negate technological overmatches, and degrade targeting opportunities. Commanders will use technology and conduct police intelligence operations to influence and control populations, evacuate detainees and, conclusively, transition rehabilitative and reconciliation operations to other functional agencies. The combat identification of friend, foe, or neutral is used to differentiate combatants from noncombatants and friendly forces from threat forces.

Civilian Internees
1-10. A CI is a civilian who is interned during armed conflict, occupation, or other military operation for security reasons, for protection, or because he or she committed an offense against the detaining power. (JP 3-63) CIs, unless they have committed acts for which they are considered unlawful combatants, generally qualify for protected status according to the GC, which also establishes procedures that must be observedwhen depriving such civilians of their liberty. CIs are to be accommodated separately from EPWs and persons deprived of liberty for any other reason.
1-11. Protected persons are persons protected by the Geneva Convention who find themselves, in case of a conflict or occupation, in the hands of a party to the conflict or occupying power of which they are not nationals. (AR 190-8). Protected persons who are interned for imperative reasons of security are also known as CIs. Protected persons under the Geneva Conventions include—

  • Hors de combat (refers to the prohibition of attacking enemy personnel who are “out of combat”).
  • Detainees (combatants and CIs).
  • Wounded and sick in the field and at sea.
  • Civilians.

Note. If protected persons are detained as spies or saboteurs or are suspected of or engaged in activities hostile to the security of the state or occupying power, they may be interned or imprisoned. In such cases, they retain their status as a protected person and are granted the full rights and privileges of protected persons.

DISLOCATED CIVILIANS
1-19. The term dislocated civilian is a broad term that includes a displaced person, an evacuee, an expellee, an internally displaced person, a migrant, a refugee, or a stateless person. (JP 3-57) DCs are individuals who leave their homes for various reasons, such as an armed conflict or a natural disaster, and whose movement and physical presence can hinder military operations. They most likely require some degree of aid, such as medicine, food, shelter, or clothing. DCs may not be native to the area or to the country in which they reside. (See chapter 10.) The following DC subcategories are also defined in JP 3-57:

  • Displaced person. A displaced person is a civilian who is involuntarily outside the national boundaries of his or her country. (JP 1-02) Displaced persons may have been dislocated because of a political, geographical, environmental, or threat situation.
  • Evacuee. An evacuee is a civilian removed from a place of residence by military direction for reasons of personal security or the requirements of the military situation. (JP 3-57)
  • Internally displaced person. An internally displaced person is any person who has left their residence by reason of real or imagined danger but has not left the territory of their own country.Internally displaced persons may have been forced to flee their homes for the same reasons as refugees, but have not crossed an internationally recognized border.
  • Expellee. An expellee is a civilian outside the boundaries of the country of his or her nationality or ethnic origin who is being forcibly repatriated to that country or to a third country for political or other purposes. (JP 3-57)
  • Migrant. A migrant is a person who (1) belongs to a normally migratory culture who may cross national boundaries, or (2) has fled his or her native country for economic reasons rather than fear of political or ethnic persecution. (JP 3-57)
  • Refugee. A refugee is a person, who by reason of real or imagined danger, has left their home country or country of their nationality and is unwilling or unable to return.
  • Stateless person. A stateless person is a civilian who has been denationalized or whose country of origin cannot be determined or who cannot establish a right to the nationality claimed.


AGENCIES CONCERNED WITH INTERNMENT AND RESETTLEMENT
1-40. External involvement in I/R missions is a fact of life for military police organizations. Some government and government-sponsored entities that may be involved in I/R missions include—

  • International agencies.
  • UN.
  • International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).
  • International Organization of Migration.
  • U.S. agencies.
  • Local U.S. embassy.
  • Department of Homeland Security.
  • U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
  • Federal Emergency Management Agency.

1-41. The U.S. Army National Detainee Reporting Center (NDRC), supported by theater detainee reporting centers (TDRCs), detainee accountability, including reporting to the ICRC central tracing agency.
1-42. There are also numerous private relief organizations, foreign and domestic, that will likely be involved in the humanitarian aspects of I/R operations. Likewise, the news media normally provides extensive coverage of I/R operations. Adding to the complexity of these operations is the fact that DOD is often not the lead agency. For instance, the DOD could be tasked in a supporting role, with the Department of State or some other agency in the lead. (See appendix E.)

SUPPORT TO CIVIL SUPPORT OPERATIONS
2-39. Civil support is the DOD support to U.S. civil authorities for domestic emergencies, and for designated law enforcement and other activities. (JP 3-28) Civil support includes operations that address the consequences of natural or man-made disasters, accidents, terrorist attacks and incidents in the U.S. and its territories.
2-40. The I/R tasks performed in support of civil support operations are similar to those during combat operations, but the techniques and procedures are modified based on the special OE associated with operating within U.S. territory and according to the categories of individuals (primarily DCs) to be housed in I/R facilities. During long-term I/R operations, state and federal agencies will operate within and around I/R facilities within the scope of their capabilities and identified role. Military police commanders must closely coordinate and synchronize their efforts with them especially in cases where civil authority and capabilities have broken down or been destroyed.

PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS OFFICER
3-55. The PSYOP officer in charge of supporting I/R operations serves as the special staff officer responsible for PSYOP. The PSYOP officer advises the military police commander on the psychological impact of military police or MI actions to prevent misunderstandings and disturbances by detainees and DCs. The supporting I/R PSYOP team has two missions that reduce the need to divert military police assets to maintain security in the I/R facility. (See appendix J.) The team—

  • Assists the military police force in controlling detainees and DCs.
  • Introduces detainees or DCs to U.S. and multinational policy.

3-56. The PSYOP team also supports the military police custodial mission in the I/R facility. The team—

  • Develops PSYOP products that are designed to pacify and acclimate detainees or DCs to accept U.S. I/R facility authority and regulations.
  • Gains the cooperation of detainees or DCs to reduce the number of guards needed.
  • Identifies malcontents, trained agitators, and political leaders within the facility who may try to organize resistance or create disturbances.
  • Develops and executes indoctrination programs to reduce or remove antagonistic attitudes.
  • Identifies political activists.
  • Provides loudspeaker support (such as administrative announcements and facility instructions when necessary).
  • Helps the military police commander control detainee and DC populations during emergencies.
  • Plans and executes a PSYOP program that produces an understanding and appreciation of U.S. policies and actions.


DETAINEE PROCESSING TECHNIQUE
4-33. Upon capture, Soldiers must process detainees using the “search, silence, segregate, speed, safeguard, and tag (5 Ss and T)” technique. This technique provides a structure to guide Soldiers in conducting detainee operations until they transfer custody of detainees to another authority or location. Complete the “5 Ss and T” technique as follows:

  • Search. Neutralize a detainee and confiscate weapons, personal items, and items of potential intelligence and/or evidentiary value.
  • Silence. Prevent detainees from communicating with one another or making audible clamor such as chanting, singing, or praying. Silence uncooperative detainees by muffling them with a soft, clean cloth tied around their mouths and fastened at the backs of their heads. Do not use duct tape or other adhesives, place a cloth or either objects inside the mouth, or apply physical force to silence detainees.
  • Segregate. Segregate detainees according to policy and SOPs (segregation requirements differ from operation to operation). The ability to segregate detainees may be limited by the availability of manpower and resources at the POC. At a minimum, try to segregate detainees by grade, gender, age (keeping adults from juveniles and small children with mothers), and security risk. MI and military police personnel can provide additional guidance and support in determining the appropriate segregation criteria.
  • Speed. Quickly move detainees from the continuing risks associated with other combatants or sympathizers who may still be in the area of capture. If there are more detainees than the Soldiers can control, call for additional support, search the detainees, and hold them in place until reinforcements arrive.
  • Safeguard. Protect detainees and ensure the custody and integrity of all confiscated items. Soldiers must safeguard detainees from combat risk, harm caused by other detainees, and improper treatment or care. Report all injuries. Correct and report violations of U.S. military policy that occur while safeguarding detainees. Acts and/or omissions that constitute inhumane treatment are violations of the law of war and, as such, must be corrected immediately. Simply reporting violations is insufficient. If a violation is ongoing, a Soldier has an obligation to stop the violation and report it.
  • Tag. Ensure that each detainee is tagged using DD Form 2745. Confiscated equipment, personal items, and evidence will be linked to the detainee using the DD Form 2745 number. When a DA Form 4137 is used to document confiscated items, it will be linked to the detainee by annotating the DD Form 2745 control number on the form.


6-8. When constructing a facility, planning considerations may include, but are not limited to—

  • Clear zones. As appropriate, mission variables determine the clear zone surrounding each facility that houses detainees. Construct at least two fences (interior and exterior) around the detainee facility and ensure that the clear zone between the interior and exterior fences is free of vegetation and shrubbery.
  • Guard towers. Locate guard towers on the perimeter of each facility. Place them immediately outside the wall or, in case of double fencing, where they permit an unobstructed view of the lane between the fences. The space between towers must allow overlapping observation and fields of fire. During adverse weather, it may be necessary to augment security by placing fixed guard posts between towers on the outside of the fence. Towers must be high enough to allow an unobstructed view of the compound and low enough to permit an adequate field of fire. The tower platform should have retractable ladders and should be wide enough to mount crew-served weapons. Another consideration involves using nonlethal capabilities from guard towers.
  • Lights. Provide adequate lighting, especially around compound perimeters. Illuminating walls and fences discourages escapes, and illuminating inner strategic points expedites the handling of problems caused by detainees. Lights should be protected from breakage with an unbreakable glass shield or a wire mesh screen. Ensure that lights on the walls and fences do not interfere with the guards’ vision. Provide secondary emergency lighting.
  • Patrol roads. Construct patrol roads for vehicle and foot patrols. They should be adjacent to outside perimeter fences or walls.
  • Sally ports. A sally port is required to search vehicles and personnel entering and leaving the main compound. It is recommended that a sally port be placed at the back entrance to the facility.
  • Communications. Ensure that communication between the towers and the operation headquarters is reliable. Telephones are the preferred method; however, ensure that alternate forms of communication (radio and visual or sound signals) are available if telephones are inoperable.

6-9. The facility layout depends on the nature of the operation, terrain, building materials, and HN support. Each facility should contain—

  • Barracks (may be general-purpose medium tents in the early stages of an operation).
  • Kitchen and dining facilities.
  • Bath houses.
  • Latrines.
  • Recreation areas.
  • Chapel facilities.
  • Administrative areas with a command post, an administrative building, an interrogation facility, a dispensary, an infirmary, a mortuary, and a supply building.
  • Receiving and processing centers.
  • Maximum security areas with individual cells.
  • Parking areas.
  • Trash collection points.
  • Potable water points.
  • Storage areas.
  • Hazardous materials storage areas.
  • Generator and fuel areas.


Share this:

facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Related Material From the Archive:

  1. U.S. Army Regulation 190–8 Enemy Prisoners of War, Retained Personnel, Civilian Internees and Other Detainees
  2. (U//FOUO) U.S. Army Network Operations (NETOPS) Manual

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart
2 Timothy 3:1-4
“But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

HUGE MILITARY EXERCISE IN FORT LAUDERDALE FLORIDA ~ started in 7 southern states and spreading to 9 more.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGpRFKG_fos&feature=youtu.be


Published on Mar 28, 2015

I WANT TO THANK CHRISTIAN FOR GRANTING ME PERMISSION TO SHARE THIS!
HUGE MILITARY EXERCISE CAUGHT ON CAMERA IN FORT LAUDERDALE FLORIDA. THANKS TO CHRISTIAN FOR THE FOOTAGE. THIS IS JUST ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF MILITARY BUILD UP PRE “JADE HELM” #JADEHELM 2015

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

Video | Posted on by | 1 Comment

Graham Blasts McDonough Over Israel Comments “The borders of Israel and an independent Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps” WTF!.


Image: Graham Blasts McDonough Over Israel Comments
(Michael Reynolds/EPA/Landov; Gustavo Amador/EPA/Landov)

Tuesday, 24 Mar 2015 07:47 AM

By Melanie Batley

White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough has said that President Barack Obama will not overlook the comments Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made in the closing days of his campaign that he had abandoned support of the two-state solution and approved of settlements in the contested territory in Jerusalem.

“We cannot simply pretend these comments were never made,” McDonough said to a pro-Israeli group, J Street, which opposes some of Netanyahu’s policies, Politico reported.

Netanyahu’s efforts since the election to backtrack on what he meant when he said there would not be an establishment of a Palestinian state on his watch.

“The United States will never stop working for a two-state solution and a lasting peace that Israelis and Palestinians so richly deserve,” he said.

He said of the settlements, “An occupation that has lasted more than 50 years must end.”

But South Carolina GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham seized on the comments about the settlements and slammed McDonough saying he had used the same language of terrorists, The Hill reported.

“The language used by the chief of staff of the president of the United States is exactly what Hamas uses,” Graham said Monday from the Senate floor, according to The Hill.

“Today, the chief of staff of the president of the United States used language that has been reserved for terrorist organizations.”

“Is your country occupying the West Bank or are you there to make sure the West Bank doesn’t turn into Gaza?” Graham asked. “The chief of the staff of the president of the United States is looking at a world completely different than the one I am viewing.”

Graham warned Obama is that if the United States does not act on Israel’s behalf at the United Nations, “Congress will recalculate how we relate to the United Nations.”

“All I can say is, when I thought it couldn’t get worse, it has,” Graham said, referring to McDonough’s speech.

“Wake up and change your policies before you set the whole world on fire. Please watch your language. …You’re making everything worse, and now you’ve added fuel to the fire.”

Read More: http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Denis-McDonough-Israel-benjamin-netanyahu-the-obama-administration/2015/03/24/id/634117/#ixzz3VjuqAXBy

White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough Remarks As Prepared at J Street Annual Conference

As Prepared for Delivery https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/03/23/white-house-chief-staff-denis-mcdonough-remarks-prepared-j-street-annual

Good afternoon, everybody. Thank you, Alex, for your very kind introduction. It’s great to be here at J Street with so many friends who are committed to a strong alliance between the United States and Israel, to the security of the State of Israel, and to peace.
I want to thank Jeremy Ben-Ami, Mort Halperin, and everyone at J Street for the important work you do around the country, including those of you from my home state of Minnesota. President Obama actually got a letter last week—one of the ten letters from Americans he reads every night—from a couple in Minneapolis. They were just writing to thank the President for standing up for a progressive agenda, and they signed the letter, “Your Minnesota Jewish cheering squad.” That was pretty great.
President Obama asked me to convey his deep appreciation to all of you for your partnership and your work on behalf of the U.S.-Israel relationship, especially building support for our efforts to advance a two-state solution.
I also want to acknowledge all the young people in the audience—more than 1,000 college students. I know sitting in a dark conference hall listening to some guy in a suit give a speech probably isn’t everyone’s ideal spring break. That you are here continues a tradition of young Jewish American leaders working to make our union more perfect, even if – as with the bravery of Rachel Beyda at UCLA – doing so opens you to criticism. You make us all stronger and America even better. Thank you.
Now, I started out with President Obama as part of his national security team, but as his Chief of Staff—and with appreciation for all the work J Street has done as our partner—I want to focus first on the big picture: how far our country has come these past six years. Because J Street is an organization that, in the best tradition of the American Jewish community, shares a set of values about the type of country that we are – a democracy where all of our people can access opportunity.
With typical American determination, we turned around the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. We’re at 60 months of private-sector job growth—the longest streak on record. America’s businesses have created 12 million new jobs and unemployment is down from 10 percent in 2009 to 5.5 percent today. We’ve cut our deficit by about two-thirds. Middle-class wages are finally growing again. And, as President Obama reminded us last week, none of this happened by accident. It’s in part a result of, in his words, “decisions made by [this] administration…to prevent a second depression, and to lay a new foundation for growth and prosperity.”
Because of those decisions, an auto industry that was flat-lining is once again churning out great American cars, and we’re negotiating new high-standard trade agreements that will make it easier to sell those cars, and other goods made in America, all over the world. Factories are now opening their doors here at home at the fastest pace in nearly two decades. As Interior Secretary Jewell reported last week, we’ve helped boost oil production from 5 million to 9 million barrels per day, increased solar energy production ten-fold, and tripled wind energy generation. In so doing, we’re creating jobs and protecting the planet for future generations—and the United States is leading the global fight against climate change.
We’re making sure more of our people have the tools they need to get ahead in the 21st century. More of our kids are graduating from high school than ever before, and more Americans are earning their degrees than ever before. Today is also the fifth anniversary of President Obama signing into law the Affordable Care Act. Sixteen million more Americans now have the security of health insurance, cutting the ranks of the uninsured in America by about a third. Health care prices have risen at the slowest rate in 50 years. And young entrepreneurs can now compare and buy affordable plans, which frees them up to strike out on their own – making it easier for them to follow their dreams, start new businesses, and create more jobs.
We’ve fought for policies that make it easier for women to participate in the work force—equal pay, better maternity leave, and flexible work schedules. We’ve advanced historic protections for LGBT Americans. And President Obama has appointed more women, minorities, and openly gay judges—all exceptionally talented jurists–to the federal bench than any president in history, including putting two extraordinary women on the Supreme Court – Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.
Last month, the President put forth a budget that will build on this progress and keep us moving forward. It’s a strategy for middle-class economics—growth that benefits everyone. Unfortunately, last week, Republicans in Congress unveiled a budget that will do the opposite, undermining our progress with top-down economics that have failed the country before.
The Republican budget prioritizes tax cuts for those at the very top, while cutting investments in education and job training that benefit middle-class families. It would end initiatives that help small manufacturers grow their businesses and create jobs. It would strip health insurance from millions and gut Medicaid, doubling the ranks of the uninsured. The House even proposes to end Medicare as we know it. They call it the “path to prosperity” – but as the President said, it’s only a path to prosperity for people who have already prospered.
Nor is it a path to security. At a time when we’re facing global challenges that require America to lead in new ways, the Republican budget would cut our core national security funding. That’s right. Let me say it again—the Republican budget would cut our core national security funding. Now, since we go through the budget process each year, this sometimes feels like theatre without consequences. The consequences, however, are very real. The consequences of the Republican budget are a smaller military force and less funding for training and equipment, leaving our troops exposed to greater risks.
Or, take another issue we all feel so strongly about: assistance to Israel and funding to promote peace. Our military assistance to Israel – which, among other things, includes Iron Dome – comes from the defense side of the national security budget. On the other side is our non-defense funding for the entire world, including critical areas in the Middle East. The problem is, adjusting for inflation, the Republican budget holds both sides of that core budget – defense and non-defense – at the lowest point in a decade. That means we would be investing in our national security – in 2016– at 2006 levels. That’s a decade ago. Well, the threats we face in 2016 won’t be 2006 threats. And the threats Israel faces won’t be 2006 threats. We have to do better.
So as they debate their budget this week, Republicans need to answer a simple question: why does a budget at 2006 levels not put at risk the critical investments we need to make, including in Israel’s defense?
The President’s budget, on the other hand, provides the resources necessary to sustain our National Security Strategy and protect America’s vital interests. President Obama has proposed an increase in defense spending—and non-defense spending—and ways to pay for it. For Israel alone, we’ve requested more than $3 billion in foreign military financing and more than $100 million to improve Israel’s capability to defend against ballistic and cruise missile threats. And we’ve asked for an additional $55 million for Iron Dome.
Of course, our relationship with Israel isn’t defined by numbers in a budget. Ours is a deep and abiding partnership between two vibrant democracies. We saw that democracy in action when Israelis of all backgrounds—Jewish and Arab, religious and secular–cast their ballots last week. At the heart of any democracy is the right of all citizens to participate equally.
In his call to congratulate Prime Minister Netanyahu last Thursday, President Obama committed to continuing consultations on a range of regional issues, including resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The process of forming a new Israeli government is now underway, and in the coming days and weeks, we’ll see what that looks like. So, with the remainder of my time with you today, I’d like to share with you how President Obama sees the road ahead.
First, no matter who leads Israel, America’s commitment to Israel’s security will never waver. As we all know, Israel faces real dangers in a tough neighborhood. I traveled with then-Senator Obama to Israel in 2008. I will never forget our time in the holy city of Jerusalem and following behind him as he approached the Western Wall—and even in the dark hours of that very early morning, it was a place bustling with energy afforded by one’s faith. On that trip, the President toured Sderot and saw the devastation wrought by Hamas-launched rockets. He met with Israelis living under the threat of rocket attacks. And, since then, I’ve seen President Obama’s personal commitment to increasing our security cooperation with Israel to unprecedented levels.
Today, our security, military, and intelligence cooperation is stronger than it’s ever been, and that’s not going to change. The U.S.-Israel consultative group will continue to ensure cooperation at the highest levels of our governments. Under President Obama, we’ve spent hundreds of millions helping to develop David’s Sling and the Arrow missile defense systems. I recall very clearly a call with the Israeli Ambassador at 5:00 PM on a Friday evening last July, when he requested – and shortly thereafter the President and Congress delivered – an additional $225 million for Iron Dome missiles and batteries. That on top of the nearly $1 billion we had invested in Iron Dome already, which saved so many Israeli lives during the conflict with Hamas last summer. And, next year, when we deliver the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, Israel will be the only country in the Middle East with a fifth-generation aircraft. In other words, we will continue to ensure Israel’s qualitative military edge. As the President has said so many times, we have Israel’s back.
Second, we continue to believe that the best way to safeguard Israel’s long-term security is to bring about a comprehensive peace between Israelis and Palestinians—two states for two peoples, living side-by-side in security and peace.
To achieve this, the United States has long advocated direct negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians. In 2009, Prime Minister Netanyahu publicly endorsed a two-state solution. Over the course of President Obama’s administration, most recently with the tireless efforts of Secretary Kerry, the United States has expended tremendous energy in pursuit of this goal. That is why the Prime Minister’s comments on the eve of the election—in which he first intimated and then made very clear in response to a follow up question that a Palestinian state will not be established while he is prime minister—were so troubling.
After the election, the Prime Minister said that he had not changed his position, but for many in Israel and in the international community, such contradictory comments call into question his commitment to a two-state solution, as did his suggestion that the construction of settlements has a strategic purpose of dividing Palestinian communities and his claim that conditions in the larger Middle East must be more stable before a Palestinian state can be established. We cannot simply pretend that those comments were never made, or that they don’t raise questions about the Prime Minister’s commitment to achieving peace through direct negotiations.
In recent days, some have suggested our reaction to this issue is a matter of personal pique. Nothing could be further from the truth. America’s commitment to a two-state solution is fundamental to U.S. foreign policy. It’s been the goal of both Republican and Democratic presidents, and it remains our goal today. Because it is the only way to secure Israel’s future as a Jewish and democratic state.
That is why President Obama has said that we need to re-evaluate our approach to the peace process and how we pursue the cause of peace – because, like all of you, we care deeply about Israel and its future. We will look to the next Israeli government to match words with actions and policies that demonstrate a genuine commitment to a two-state solution. And, like every administration since President Johnson, we will continue to oppose Israeli settlement activity since it undermines the prospects for peace. Meanwhile, we share Israel’s concern about the security environment in the region – which is why, as part of the last round of talks – the President and Secretary Kerry had General John Allen prepare a detailed plan to provide for security in the West Bank over the long-term.
In the end, we know what a peace agreement should look like.

The borders of Israel and an independent Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps [WTF!].

Each state needs secure and recognized borders, and there must be robust provisions that safeguard Israel’s security. An occupation that has lasted for almost 50 years must end, and the Palestinian people must have the right to live in and govern themselves in their own sovereign state.
President Obama still firmly believes what he said in Jerusalem two years ago—that peace is necessary, just, and possible. Peace is necessary because it is the only way to ensure that a secure State of Israel is both Jewish and democratic. Israel cannot maintain military control of another people indefinitely. That’s the truth. And as President Obama has said, neither occupation nor expulsion of Palestinians is the answer. Anything less than true peace will only worsen the situation. A “one-state solution” would effectively end Israel’s nature as a Jewish and democratic state. Unilateral annexation of the West Bank territories would be both wrong and illegal. The United States would never support it, and it’s unlikely Israel’s other friends would either. It would only contribute to Israel’s isolation.
Peace is also undeniably just. Palestinian children deserve the same right to be free in their own land as Israeli children in their land. A two-state solution will finally bring Israelis the security and normalcy to which they are entitled, and Palestinians the sovereignty and dignity they deserve.
And we cannot give up on the idea that peace is possible, because peace will make Israel stronger. It would provide clear, secure borders that would increase Israel’s security. It would deal a knock-out blow to calls for boycotts, divestment, and sanctions, which many of you have fought hard and courageously to oppose. It would undercut efforts to isolate Israel in the international community and roll back de-legitimization efforts.
Achieving peace won’t be easy. It will require political courage. But nothing would do more to improve Israel’s security or its relations with its neighbors than to bring about a sovereign and contiguous Palestinian state alongside a secure, democratic, Jewish Israel. No nation has done more to stand with Israel in the world, including at the United Nations, than the United States. And so, as difficult as it is, the United States will never stop working for a two-state solution and the lasting peace that Israelis and Palestinians so richly deserve.
I know that you are here because you care deeply about the cause of peace. And your voices are important too – you can help remind people that there is a great constituency for peace; that there are people who believe, as President Obama does, that peace is necessary, peace is just, and – yes – peace is possible.
Third, and finally, the United States will continue to do everything in our power to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. In the coming days, our P5+1 negotiators will continue to meet with Iran’s representatives to see if we can bridge the remaining gaps and come to an understanding that will peacefully and verifiably resolve the international community’s concerns with Iran’s nuclear program. And, as we have said all along, we will not accept a bad deal.
Our diplomatic engagement with Iran has already delivered concrete results. Through the Joint Plan of Action, we’ve succeeded in stopping the advance of Iran’s nuclear program and even rolling it back in key areas. Iran is getting rid of its existing stockpile of its most highly enriched uranium. It has capped its stockpiles of low-enriched uranium and frozen its enrichment activities—that means no new enrichment facilities and no new centrifuges, including its next-generation models. Iran has also ceased construction on its plutonium reactor at Arak.
We know Iran is living up to its commitments so far because, through the Joint Plan, we have gained unprecedented access to Iran’s nuclear program. For the first time, inspectors with the International Atomic Energy Agency are allowed daily access to Iran’s key nuclear sites at Natanz and Fordow. Along with our international partners, we have provided Iran with extremely limited sanctions relief. But make no mistake, Iran’s economy is still under enormous pressure, and Iran remains cut off from the vast majority of its foreign currency reserves.
The question now is whether we can reach a long-term deal—one that provides verifiable assurances that Iran cannot pursue a nuclear weapon. Two weeks ago, my friend and colleague Susan Rice, the President’s national security advisor, laid out exactly what we are trying to accomplish with these negotiations. As she said, “a good deal is one that would cut off every pathway for Iran to produce enough fissile material for a nuclear weapon. Every single one.”
That means Iran would not be able to develop weapons-grade plutonium at Arak, or anywhere else, nor would it be allowed to use its underground site at Fordow to enrich uranium. A deal would also extend the amount of time it would take Iran to produce a single bomb’s worth of weapons-grade uranium—to reach breakout capacity. According to experts, Iran is only two or three months away from breakout, but under a deal, that window would have to be at least a year.
To prevent Iran from pursuing a nuclear weapon through covert channels, any deal would include frequent and intrusive inspections at Iran’s nuclear sites. The only deal we’ll accept is one that assures us that Iran’s nuclear program is entirely peaceful. And, if we detect any failure to comply on Iran’s part, the extended breakout window would give us plenty of time to respond. In other words, we’d make it harder for Iran to reach breakout and rush for a nuclear bomb.
Any deal would last for more than a decade—setting back Iran’s program for far longer than would military strikes. And, at the expiration of any deal, Iran would still be obliged under international agreements to provide comprehensive access to its nuclear facilities and to continue providing assurances that it is not pursuing nuclear weapons.
Let me make one final, critical point about these negotiations. The deal we are pursuing is both realistic and achievable. A scenario where Iran forgoes domestic enrichment capacity for all time would surely be ideal, but it’s not grounded in reality. Not even our closest partners support denying Iran the ability to pursue peaceful nuclear energy forever, and Iran already knows how to enrich uranium. We can’t turn back the clock on that. An absolutist position makes for good rhetoric, but as Ambassador Rice said, “sound bites won’t stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon.”
The bottom line is this—compared to the alternatives, diplomacy offers the best and most effective way to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, and this is our best shot at diplomacy. We have to give diplomacy a chance to succeed.
Let me also say that the Obama Administration welcomes and appreciates the important role Congress plays in U.S. policy toward Iran. Congress helped put in place the strongest sanctions regime ever against Iran, which helped bring Iran to the negotiating table. Now that we’re at the table, Congress should not seek to undermine negotiations before a deal is reached.
I’m sure you heard about the letter some Republican senators addressed directly to Iran’s leaders. It was a blatant political move—as the President said, that is not how America does its business. Moreover, some of the same Senators who signed that letter criticize the President’s proposed Authorization for the Use of Military Force against ISIL because it imposes limits on the Commander-in-Chief. So they want to give the President open-ended authorities to wage war in the Middle East, while imposing strict limits on his ability to reach an agreement that could help prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon without waging another war in the Middle East. Open-ended authority for war but limits on diplomacy? That just doesn’t make sense. We cannot remove diplomacy from America’s toolbox – that’s not how we’ve come to lead the world.
The letter was also critically flawed in its legal reasoning. We are pursuing a political arrangement with Iran that does not require congressional approval. Such deals are an essential, long-standing element of international diplomacy. Republican and Democratic presidents alike have relied on them. It’s how President Roosevelt negotiated the Atlantic Charter. It’s how President Nixon, with the Shanghai Communique, helped open our relationship with China. It’s how we—peacefully—removed Syria’s entire declared stockpile of chemical weapons. Those are just a few examples of many.
Some senators have also proposed legislation that would torpedo diplomacy by suggesting Congress must vote on any deal and by stripping the President of his existing authorities to waive sanctions. Let’s be very clear about what this would do. It would embolden hard-liners in Iran. It would separate the United States from our allies. And it would potentially fracture the international unity that has been essential to keeping the pressure on Iran. In other words, this legislation could cause the United States to be blamed if diplomacy fails. Additionally, it would set a damaging precedent by limiting the ability of future presidents to conduct essential diplomatic negotiations. That’s why President Obama has said: should this legislation pass Congress—he will veto it.
If a deal is reached, we will share the details and technical documents with Congress, at which point we welcome a full debate—after all, only Congress could terminate U.S. statutory sanctions on Iran during the duration of the agreement. And everyone from the President on down will aggressively seek congressional and public support for any deal. There will surely be voices on all sides—I hope that yours will be among them. Because a good deal is the best way to reach our shared goal—preventing Iran from gaining a nuclear weapon.
Even if a nuclear deal is reached, our concerns about Iran’s behavior in the region and around the world will endure. Iran remains a state sponsor of terrorism, a proliferator and a gross violator of human rights. It actively seeks to destabilize its neighbors, props up the Assad regime in Syria, and supports groups devoted to violence such as Hezbollah and Hamas. Iranian leaders have threatened Israel’s very existence, behavior and rhetoric that have no place in the 21st Century.
Yet to walk away from the opportunity to diplomatically and peacefully resolve one of the greatest threats to international security would not strengthen our hand to stop Iran’s destabilizing actions. Imagine for a moment how an Iran armed with a nuclear weapon, secure in its ability to deter its neighbors, would use that nuclear overhang to even more aggressively destabilize the region and transfer nefarious technology. It will therefore be far better for everyone—including Israel—to counter other challenges from Tehran while having verifiably addressed the international community’s concerns over its nuclear program. And that is what President Obama intends to do.
Last week, President Obama released his annual message for Nowruz—the Persian new year. As he has every year, he spoke directly to the people and leaders of Iran. He made it clear that Iran’s leaders face a choice between two paths. The first is the path Iran is on today—one that has cut off Iran from the world and caused needless hardship for the Iranian people. If Iran’s leaders cannot accept a reasonable deal, that is the path Iran will remain on. But if Iran’s leaders agree to a deal, there can be a better path—one that opens up opportunities for the Iranian people to participate in the global economy, creates jobs, and builds a brighter future.
The challenges I’ve described today aren’t easy—but they aren’t impossible either. As Jewish congregations across the country prayed on Saturday—and I won’t attempt the Hebrew here—He who makes peace in His high places, He shall make peace upon us, and upon all of Israel. But it’s not enough for us to just hope for peace in our world; it’s up to us to make it happen. In my Catholic tradition, when I think about the work ahead of us, I remember the words of St. Augustine. “Pray as though everything depended on God,” he said, “work as though everything depended on you.”
St. Augustine was speaking about the same responsibility that Jewish people know as tikkun olam – our shared duty to heal the world. The problems we face may seem overwhelming, but we push forward. Smart choices, a relentless determination—they can add up to progress. They add up to a world that’s more peaceful and more secure than it was before.
That’s why we’re never going to give up on peace between Israelis and Palestinians. That’s why we’re going to give everything we’ve got to see if we can get a good nuclear deal with Iran. And that’s why our commitment to the security of the Israeli people will never waver.
Like so many of you, I’m a parent. My wife Kari and I have three incredible kids. And like parents everywhere, we want our children to grow up in a country and a world that is peaceful and where, if they work hard, they can reach their God-given potential. I want you to know that President Obama is working every day to make that future possible. And he firmly believes that, if we work together, if we work—as St. Augustine said—as though everything depended on us, we will succeed in leaving our children a better world. Thank you so much. And thank you for being our partners in this work.

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

GONE VIRAL: Have you seen the amazing buzz our Cornell ISIS story has created?


Project Veritas
Have you seen the amazing buzz our Cornell ISIS story has created?

emailimage.jpg Right now, my staff is moving at a frantic pace to keep up with this fast-moving story.

If you haven’t watched our Cornell ISIS video yet, you can view it here.

Our phones are ringing off the hooks with interview requests and we’re receiving widespread media coverage.

But this is a good problem to have. It means we’re having great success holding people and institutions in power accountable and forcing the media to cover stories they want to suppress and ignore.

To give you a quick update, the New York Post was the first to break the story. They opened with this damaging sentence: “This guy is either the dumbest Ivy League bigwig ever or politically correct to a fault — for welcoming offers to bring ISIS and Hamas to Cornell University.

I know you understand how important this story is. But what you may not know is this: Cornell has received $300 million from the federal government since 2000 and $190 million from New York since 2012. Taxpayers like you and me and millions of other Americans have a right to know where our money is going!

And our timing couldn’t have been better. The story broke on Cornell’s inaugural Annual Giving Day. I can tell you that we have been bombarded with outraged Cornell alumni who decided to support Project Veritas rather than their alma mater.

Watch the Cornell ISIS video here.

I’ve been interviewed by Lars Larson, Sean Hannity, and Dana Loesch. And the story has been covered by the Drudge Report, Lou Dobb’s and Imus’ shows on Fox Business, the Mark Levin Show, the Daily Caller and Fox 5 New York to name just a few.

And Cornell Vice President for University Relations, Joel Malina responded by saying . . .

“Cornell fully supports the free exchange of ideas and does not review or control the political ideology of our students. We do not, of course, tolerate unlawful advocacy of violence, and the comment about training by ISIS freedom fighters does not reflect university policy,”

Later, Cornell President, David Skorton, attacked us personally and published his statement on the front of the University’s website.

I responded to President Skorton with this statement: “If your assistant Dean of Students has never heard of Hamas or the ‘Islamic State of Iraq and Syria,’ Project Veritas should be the least of your concerns. We stand by our report about your university. There is more to come.

I’ll continue to keep you updated as new developments emerge in the story.

Thank you for your loyal support.

In Truth,

James O’Keefe, President
Project Veritas

P.S. I hope you’re as excited as I am about the widespread response and media coverage to our new Cornell ISIS video.

If you haven’t seen the video yet, watch it here on our website.

More to come in our campus investigation series soon!

PROJECT VERITAS IS A 501(C)(3) CONTRIBUTIONS ARE TAX-DEDUCTIBLE.

1214 West Boston Post Road No. 156
Mamaroneck, NY 10543

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

John Bolton: Bomb Iran


Here’s some free advice for President Obama – to stop Iran’s bomb, bomb Iran.

My editorial in yesterday’s New York Times was the most emailed article on their site for a single reason… The American people understand the grave threat posed by Iran better than our president does. And certainly more than Hillary Clinton does.

I’m not blind to the threat, nor am I afraid to say and do what’s necessary to protect America.

If you agree with me, I need your support now.

If you agree the president’s policy is empowering Iran and that any deal that allows Iran to continue their nuclear weapons program is a surrender by the United States, then click here now. Pledge your support by making a donation of $10 or more to John Bolton PAC.

I’ve promised you time and time again – I will do absolutely anything to ensure that America is safe and strong. Even if it means speaking the truth no matter how badly the liberals wished I remained silent.

I promised you I would launch an all-out-assault on Obama’s failed foreign policy and don’t intend to hold back. If you’re with me, I need your support right now, so I can fight off the attacks that are sure to come.

Iran will not negotiate away its nuclear program. Nor will sanctions block its building a broad and deep weapons infrastructure.

The strategic implications of Obama’s diplomacy are frightening, and we face the prospect of a thoroughly nuclear-weaponized Middle East.

I refuse to be silent on this, and I urge you to do the same.

For America,


John Bolton
Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations

John Bolton PAC

John Bolton PAC welcomes your comments. Please send your comments to info@boltonpac.com.

Paid for by Bolton PAC
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee
www.boltonpac.com
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Mass-killer co-pilot who deliberately crashed Germanwings plane had to STOP training because he was suffering depression and ‘burn-out’. German police make ‘significant discovery’ at his flat


Earlier today, the chilling final moments of Flight FU 9525 were revealed by French prosecutors who said Lubitz’s sole aim was to ‘destroy the plane’.

Police investigating the Germanwings crash said tonight they had made a ‘significant discovery’ at the home of pilot Andreas Lubitz, who deliberately ploughed the Airbus A320 into the French Alps.

Officers refused to reveal details of the potential breakthrough but said it was not a suicide note.

Speaking outside the flat on the outskirts of Dusseldorf, police said they had ‘found something’ that would now be taken for tests, adding it may be a ‘clue’ as to what happened to the doomed jet.

German detectives were also pictured carrying evidence from a £400,000 home in Montabaur, a town 40 miles from Bonn, that Lubitz is believed to have shared with his parents.

The 28-year-old is understood to have split his time between the two addresses.

The forensic find comes hours after it emerged that Lubitz was forced to postpone his pilot training in 2008 because of mental health problems, with a friend saying he was ‘in depression’.

The revelation will form a central part of the investigation and raises serious questions about why he was allowed to continue his training and whether enough was done to prevent the disaster.

Airline bosses confirmed Lubitz had taken several months off work and had to retrain to join the firm, but insisted he was ‘100 per cent fit to fly’ after passing all medical tests.

The captain – named by local media as German father-of-two Patrick Sonderheimer – then left the cockpit but found himself locked out when he tried to re-enter.

Mr Robin said: ‘We hear the pilot asking the co-pilot to take over and we hear the sound of a chair being pushed back and a door closing so we assume that the captain went to the toilet or something.

‘So the co-pilot is on his own, and it is while he’s on his own that the co-pilot is in charge of the plane and uses the flight management system to start the descent of the plane.

‘At this altitude, this can only be done voluntarily. We hear several shouts from the captain asking to get in, speaking through the intercom system, but there’s no answer from the cockpit.’

Audio from the recording captures Mr Sonderheimer furiously pounding on the door to no avail.

Mr Robin said Lubitz ‘voluntarily’ refused to open the door, adding that his breathing was normal throughout the final minutes of the flight.

Experienced pilots today told MailOnline that under normal conditions crew have an emergency access code to enter the cockpit through the locked door.

They can only be stopped from using it if whoever is inside the cockpit manually – and intentionally – disables it.

The revelation will heighten fears that suicide or a terror attack was the cause of the disaster.

First picture: Germanwings co-pilot - 28-year-old German Andreas Günter Lubitz (above) - locked his captain out of the cockpit before deliberately crashing into a mountain to 'destroy the plane', it has been revealed

  • SHARE PICTURE

Copy link to paste in your message

+57

First picture: Germanwings co-pilot – 28-year-old German Andreas Günter Lubitz (above) – locked his captain out of the cockpit before deliberately crashing into a mountain to ‘destroy the plane’, it has been revealed.

For videos and to read more:

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3012053/Andreas-Lubitz-Germanwings-flight-9525-French-alps-crash-French-alps-Germanwings-plane-crash-Airbus-A320-Barcelonnette.html

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The Life and Death of Baby Walter is Changing The Abortion Debate


(LiveActionNews) — It took a long time for Michayla, age seven, to deal with the loss of her baby brother, Walter. Michayla still proudly speaks of him, telling strangers that she has two sisters here, and a baby brother in heaven.

At 19 weeks gestation, Michayla’s mother, Lexi Fretz, miscarried Walter. At the time, Fretz, her husband, Joshua, and their two daughters were hundreds of miles away from home. They had traveled for a wedding where they were both guests, as well as photographers. Then the unthinkable happened – Fretz went into labor.

Baby Walter may have only lived outside the womb for a few moments, but his life has had a lasting impact. He saved others from abortion, and helped pro-abortion individuals see the preborn as human beings deserving of life. But Walter’s family had to move on with their lives without him, starting with the long trip home.

babywalter

Baby Walter with his mother, Lexi. Images courtesy of F2 Photography by Lexi.

“There was a lady in a town next to ours who was sitting in an abortion clinic with her daughter,” Fretz said. “She was ready to go through with it. She said the whole time, she was thinking she shouldn’t be doing this. She went online while she was sitting there, and she saw Walter, and she started to cry – and they got up and left.”

READ MORE: http://www.lifenews.com/2015/03/26/the-life-and-death-of-baby-walter-is-changing-the-abortion-debate/

 

Posted in Uncategorized

52 members of Congress sign letter warning GMOs killing Monarch butterflies


The Health Ranger Congress is waking up about the detrimental effects of GMOs and glyphosate on human health, and they’re now fighting for the survival of the monarch butterfly:

Full Story

http://www.naturalnews.com/049067_monarch_butterflies_GMOs_Congress.html

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Urban Death Project seeks to compost dead humans to feed the crops: has it really come to this?


Soylent Green anyone??? is this what the Death Panels in Obamacare are for?
The Health Ranger A new non-profit project unveiled by a Seattle architect envisions deceased humans being recycled into large composting systems to provide food for crops.

Maybe I’m getting old fashioned or something, but I remember a time when we used CROPS to feed PEOPLE, not the other way around:

Full Story http://www.naturalnews.com/049082_Urban_Death_Project_composting_human_bodies_food_crops.html

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

State Sen. Tony Avella wants to ban machete possession in New York


EXCLUSIVE: Under Avella’s proposal, possessing a machete could lead up to a year in jail. He plans to introduce a bill to establish a ban, which is in response to an incident in July on Long Island where a man hacked a teenager to death.

NYC PAPERS OUT. Social media use restricted to low res file max 184 x 128 pixels and 72 dpi
The sale of machetes should be outlawed after several recent attacks, a Queens pol said Wednesday.State Sen. Tony Avella plans to introduce a bill to ban the possession of the scary blades in New York.

“The fact that anyone can easily purchase this potentially lethal tool is just crazy,” he said.

Smaller knives such as switchblades and gravity knives are already banned and listed as deadly weapons under state law, but machetes are considered the same as butcher knives.

New Yorkers carrying those knives can be ticketed for a blade longer than 4 inches, an administrative code violation. They face up to 15 days in jail and a $300 fine.

READ MORE: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/state-sen-tony-avella-ban-machetes-new-york-article-1.2120874

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Bone Broth Anyone?


Originally posted on surprise saffron:

On bitter bitter cold nights one sure way of warming up is a delicious bowl of bone broth. as the temperatures dropped so did my tolerance for the cold. So I bought a pound of beef bones from my neighborhood hunting based organic butcher.

With a friends help I set out to make bone broth. It is one of the best and easiest things to make. Besides being good for your health it becomes a great base for many soups, rice, and other dishes.
IMG_3361
Let’s get started: a pound of bones, 2 carrots, 1 large onion, a bunch of parsley, 2 bay leaves, 5 whole all spice pieces, 2 stalks of celery, half a cup of apple cider vinegar, water to cover.

You will need a pressure cooker!!
Yes, without it you might be boiling this for days.

Roast the bones in the Owen for 30-40 minutes, then put them…

View original 216 more words

Posted in Uncategorized

CUOMO PUSHES NY TO ACCEPT DESTROYING FREEDOM OF SPEECH ON THE INTERNET: FW: Broadband For All New Yorkers


2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

From the Office of The Governor

Dear Fellow New Yorker,

If you’re reading this on a screen, you deserve powerful Internet access.

Broadband is one of today’s most transformative innovations—on par with historic breakthroughs such as running water, electricity and the interstate highway system. Broadband refers to wide bandwidth data transmission, and this technology enables the fastest, most reliable Internet access service available today. It’s overwhelmingly important to a myriad of tasks in the 21st century, from banking to schoolwork to telemedicine and business—yet too many in New York lack access.

That’s why we are launching #Broadband4All, a campaign to rally support for our plan to ensure broadband access for all New Yorkers.

Click here to see the transformative plan and how you can help.

Here’s the plan in broad strokes:

  • Matching private-sector investments: A $500 million dollar broadband fund that will lead to $1 billion in public-private investment. If passed by the legislature, this would be the largest state investment in universal broadband deployment in the country.
  • Unprecedented broadband speed: Broadband providers must deliver access speeds of 100 Mbps, with funding priority given to those delivering the highest speeds at the lowest cost. In limited cases, providers may offer 25 Mbps rates to exceptionally remote unserved and underserved areas of the state, more than three times the current standard, scalable to 100 Mbps or more.
  • Local input to guide development: Each Regional Economic Development Council will submit a comprehensive plan to the State that: 1) identifies unserved and underserved areas; 2) aggregates demand across residential, institutional and business sectors; 3) details the most cost-effective means to provide universal access; and 4) leverages state-owned assets where possible.

Having powerful Internet access has become a necessity in today’s world, but in communities across the state—both rural and urban—there is a broadband gap that is leaving New Yorkers behind. This is a problem that impacts everything from businesses to hospitals and schools. We need to make a bold investment in broadband, one that ensures that every New Yorker has access to fast, reliable Internet by the end of 2018. By implementing this proposal, we can lay the foundation for a stronger and more competitive New York years into the future.Please click here and help us make #Broadband4All a reality.

Ensuring universal broadband access is the critical infrastructure project of our age. Whether it’s for our education, our personal lives, or our work, access to high-speed Internet is no longer a luxury in today’s world—it is a necessity.

Sincerely,

Governor Andrew M. Cuomo


This is a message from the New York State Executive Chamber, State Capitol, Albany, NY 12224.

Our privacy policy is available here.
Copyright 2015 New York State. All rights reserved.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Wall of Shame #3 ~ NY’s Muslima Activist Debbie Almontaser


Wall of Shame #3 ~ NY’s Muslima Activist Debbie Almontaser.

Debbie A in suit jacketToday I take you back to the Wall of Shame segment of Logan’s Warning, in order to introduce member #3. My old “friend”, NY’s Muslima activist and interfaith Queen, Debbie Almontaser.

Over the past few years I have had more than one conversation with Debbie, and the results were basically the same. When questioned on Islam she called for reinforcements and then pulled a Muslim Houdini on me.

This time the conversation started out with me pointing out that Islam preaches hatred against all Jews and Christians.

Koran 9:30:

Read More: http://loganswarning.com/2015/03/18/wall-of-shame-3-nys-muslima-activist-debbie-almontaser/

Posted in Uncategorized

EVIL IN SCHOOLS!!! Pure Evil being let go to bigger and Eviler things!


Great News: Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar” Kevin Jennings to leave U.S. Dept. of Education in July!

MassResistance kept the pressure on and led the research effort

POSTED: May 23, 2011

His upcoming departure was announced on Thursday.
Jennings was perhaps the most outrageous government appointee in memory. He is a long-time homosexual activist who began his career in Massachusetts, and founded GLSEN, the national homosexual group that targets children in schools. Jennings’ depraved record of pushing homosexuality and transgenderism to kids goes back decades.

0_61_320_jennings.jpg Kevin Jennings, well-known homosexual activist and Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar”

Jennings’ Dept. of Education office received $410 million in FY 2011. Among other efforts, last year, Jennings helped introduce Bill 4530 in Congress that would require normalization of homosexuality, transgenderism, cross-dressing, etc., in America’s public schools. He also set up an “anti-bullying” conference at the White House in March, part of the larger pro-homosexual propaganda effort.
On July 25 Jennings will be starting his new job in Cambridge, Massachusetts running Be the Change, a high-powered non-profit that “creates national issue based campaigns.” (See Item #2 below.) Be the Change was founded by Alan Khazei, a well-known liberal who recently announced he will run against US Sen. Scott Brown in 2012. See their Jennings press release here.

Culmination of an 18-month battle

Over the past eighteen months MassResistance has waged a battle in get Congress either to have Jennings’ office defunded, or have him removed. We compiled and posted a large report of Jennings’ activities going back decades– most of which MassResistance uncovered. In addition we’ve gathered over ten thousand signatures from across America on our online petition. And we’ve been communicating with various key Congressmen and their staffs, as well as other Washington DC insiders, to push this as hard as possible.

See MassResistance on-line report on Jennings’ activities HERE. aa200_299.jpg

Last year 53 Congressmen sent a letter to Obama asking that Jennings be removed. You can read that letter here.
In addition, Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX) submitted a resolution in the US House to have Jennings removed.
Plus, the Washington Times, Fox News and other media across the country called for Jennings’ removal in editorials and TV reports.
All of those — the letter, the resolution, and the news outlets — used material from MassResistance.

Jennings’ allies attacked MassResistance

In December, 2009, the Washington DC homosexual magazine MetroWeekly complained that MassResistance was behind much of the Jennings “smear” from conservatives.
Later that month, the George Soros-funded attack site Media Matters began to target MassResistance as the “source for right-wing media attacks on Jennings” with a number of vitriolic postings.
In August, 2010, Jennings addressed a meeting in Washington, DC, about the conservatives’ “extensive attacks” on him and how he thus felt constrained to openly push his agenda in Congress. He thanked Media Matters for “debunking the lies” (i.e., the truths!) about him.
This week the national homosexual magazine The Advocate acknowledged that Jennings was “The target of social conservatives during his Education Department tenure.”

Why did Jennings leave his post now?

It’s likely that Jennings was “encouraged” to be out of his Dept. of Education post before this summer’s 2012 budget fight began in full. MassResistance has been communicating with a number of Congressional offices for several months about adding language to de-fund Jennings’ office in the 2012 budget. Jennings is by now fairly well-known among the Republican leadership and a growing number of congressmen are outraged about him.
Some possible factors in Jennings’ timely departure:

(1) With the Republicans controlling the US House, it’s extremely likely that the pressure to have Jennings’ office de-funded in the FY 2012 federal budget would be successful, especially with thousands of petition signers and others ready to lobby their Senators and Congressmen very hard.

(2) If the Democrats contested those cuts, the disgusting material in our report about Jennings would have likely been brought out publicly by various Congressmen and others, which the Obama administration probably would have rather avoided.

(3) The public debate about Jennings’ unsavory activities could have lingered and possibly dogged the Obama administration into the 2012 election.

In the end, we think that even Obama had had enough of Jennings at the DOE.
THANK YOU to everyone across the country who signed our petition and who helped get the word out. Getting Kevin Jennings out of the Dept. of Education is a great victory for all Americans!
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/issues/kevin_jennings/leaving_DOE/

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

Open Sexual Deviant: I’ve Been Indoctrinating America’s Kids to Be Sodomites – I Lied about It & Am Not Sorry

Sometimes you just can’t ask for anything better than lawless people to utter their own crimes from their own mouths, except to render justice upon such crimes. Such is the case with S. Bear Bergman.

Bergman, a mentally ill woman who believes she is a man (She also claims to have “married” another woman that thinks she is a man) and cuts her hair in the style of a man’s and apparently takes hormones to grow a beard (yes, it’s disturbing to see and the entire “family” situation is beyond confusing and bizarre), provided an op-ed piece at Huffington Post in which she openly admits that she is in education to “indoctrinate your children into my LGBTQ agenda.” Furthermore, she adds, “I’m not a bit sorry.”

The self-proclaimed “writer, educator, storyteller and loudmouth,” also told her audience that one of her number one things that upset her as a young rebellious teen against God was the fact that people accused people like her of recruiting. So, to set the record straight, though it upset her, she came out in this piece to acknowledge that was, in fact, true.

“The first time I was introduced to this idea of reproduction and recruitment as the two paths to Being All The Homosexual I Could Be, I had two very strong reactions,” she wrote. “I felt the revulsion of denial, of course — we were not recruiting, and certainly not in the way that this asshole was suggesting we were. At the same time, I experienced a delicious fantasy in which I was in fact recruited and chosen to be queer. In it, I was ushered into the world of queerness with care and tenderness by experienced homos and trans people (in my imagination they were like very fabulous versions of my favorite camp counselors from childhood). I would be issued my leather jacket and my protest pins, my safer sex supplies and a hotline of some kind I could call if I needed it. As a teenaged homo trying to piece together strained relationships with my family or origin, it was a really nice idea.”

She then went on to recount days where she went into high schools and spewed her perversion among America’s and Canada’s teens (I have to ask where parents are in this country!).

“My wickedness, you see,” she confessed. “It knows no bounds.”

Good, at least we agree with that, which is exactly what the Bible declares about such deviants in the first chapter of Romans 1. They are wicked.

She also pointed out that her opposition was right in accusing her of indoctrination, but she was in the denial stage saying, “I would never indoctrinate; never recruit. I was just providing an alternate viewpoint, I said.”

However, the more one continues not only in their denial of honoring the Creator as God (Rom. 1:21), the more they are given over by that Creator to a reprobate mind, which then comes right out and tells you what they are all about. Bergman has reached that point. She went on to confess:

“I am here to tell you: All that time I said I wasn’t indoctrinating anyone with my beliefs about gay and lesbian and bi and trans and queer people? That was a lie.”

Of course, it was a lie, but she wasn’t finished.

“All 25 years of my career as an LGBTQ activist, since the very first time as a 16-year-old I went and stood shaking and breathless in front of eleven people to talk about My Story, I have been on a consistent campaign of trying to change people’s minds about us,” she said. “I want to make them like us. That is absolutely my goal. I want to make your children like people like me and my family, even if that goes against the way you have interpreted the teachings of your religion.”

Notice the boldness that comes from this woman! Notice the fact that she even throws in the root of her problem and that is “religion,” or more appropriately, what God has said about her sinful behavior.

Since she isn’t backing down and since parents in America seem to be oblivious to what the public indoctrination centers in America are allowing to be taught to young people, including young children, she is finishing up six books that portray sodomy and perversion in all its depraved glory as normal and without shame.

Bergman, like many today, know no shame (Zep. 3:5). They parade what is shameful (Rom. 1:27) around in the open and expose young impressionable minds to it (Matt. 18:6).

When she addressed the issue of why she became interested in children’s literature, notice her response. Though she claimed that becoming a parent was a partial reason for it, she then added this: “I was getting a nightly practicum in how the books a kid hears at bedtime affect their sleep and also their dreams (both in the micro and the macro sense).”

Now, I’m not going to assume what she means here, but understanding that this woman has a depraved mind in every sense of the word, what is the issue with her noticing sleep and dreams? Is there something going on here that isn’t being told?

While she is correct in saying that our communication with children is quite effective via storytelling (something even the Lord Jesus engaged in), it is the truth that needs to be conveyed in storytelling, not perversions and not lies. Bergman is the promoter of lies and I can say that with her own approval, since she admits openly in her op-ed that she is a liar.

Bergman wants people to know that sexual deviants exist. That is a given. Everyone knows that already, but she uses it as a means to taint, stain and pervert the minds of young people in America. Friends, that is unacceptable. In most states it is a crime not only to engage in sodomy, as Bergman does, but it is also a crime to contribute to the delinquency of a minor, which she is most surely doing.

So, what is Bergman’s final statement in the matter? Glad you asked.

“I would be happy — delighted, overjoyed I tell you — to cause those children to disagree with their families on the subject of LGBTQ people,” she wrote. “If that makes me an indoctrinator, I accept it. Let me be honest — I am not even a little bit sorry.”

Open, unrepentant and still at war with her Creator, Bergman blurts out the truth that Bible believing Christians have been saying all along. So, America will you now believe what your friends, the Christians, have been telling you, seeing that the God-hater has openly declared that we have been telling the truth the entire time? What will you do about it? What should be done to such people that do this to your children?

As always, I encourage every God-fearing parent to take the command of God seriously in Deuteronomy 6 and teach their own children, protecting them from deviant predators, liars and indoctrinators like S. Bear Bergman. I don’t have hate in my heart towards Bergman, I pity her. For unless she repents of her sinful behavior, she will face an angry God (Heb. 10:29) that will meet out a just punishment for her crimes against Him and against these little ones.

Finally, for those that think me “hateful,” “homophobic” and “intolerant,” I ask you do you care more about what people label you than you do protecting the most innocent among us from people like S. Bear Bergman? I would hope you do, but if those are the first thoughts that come to mind, I guess I have to question whether or not you do.

Sometimes you just can’t ask for anything better than lawless people to utter their own crimes from their own mouths, except to render justice upon such crimes. Such is the case with S. Bear Bergman.

Bergman, a mentally ill woman who believes she is a man (She also claims to have “married” another woman that thinks she is a man) and cuts her hair in the style of a man’s and apparently takes hormones to grow a beard (yes, it’s disturbing to see and the entire “family” situation is beyond confusing and bizarre), provided an op-ed piece at Huffington Post in which she openly admits that she is in education to “indoctrinate your children into my LGBTQ agenda.” Furthermore, she adds, “I’m not a bit sorry.”

The self-proclaimed “writer, educator, storyteller and loudmouth,” also told her audience that one of her number one things that upset her as a young rebellious teen against God was the fact that people accused people like her of recruiting. So, to set the record straight, though it upset her, she came out in this piece to acknowledge that was, in fact, true.

“The first time I was introduced to this idea of reproduction and recruitment as the two paths to Being All The Homosexual I Could Be, I had two very strong reactions,” she wrote. “I felt the revulsion of denial, of course — we were not recruiting, and certainly not in the way that this asshole was suggesting we were. At the same time, I experienced a delicious fantasy in which I was in fact recruited and chosen to be queer. In it, I was ushered into the world of queerness with care and tenderness by experienced homos and trans people (in my imagination they were like very fabulous versions of my favorite camp counselors from childhood). I would be issued my leather jacket and my protest pins, my safer sex supplies and a hotline of some kind I could call if I needed it. As a teenaged homo trying to piece together strained relationships with my family or origin, it was a really nice idea.”

She then went on to recount days where she went into high schools and spewed her perversion among America’s and Canada’s teens (I have to ask where parents are in this country!).

“My wickedness, you see,” she confessed. “It knows no bounds.”

Good, at least we agree with that, which is exactly what the Bible declares about such deviants in the first chapter of Romans 1. They are wicked.

She also pointed out that her opposition was right in accusing her of indoctrination, but she was in the denial stage saying, “I would never indoctrinate; never recruit. I was just providing an alternate viewpoint, I said.”

However, the more one continues not only in their denial of honoring the Creator as God (Rom. 1:21), the more they are given over by that Creator to a reprobate mind, which then comes right out and tells you what they are all about. Bergman has reached that point. She went on to confess:

“I am here to tell you: All that time I said I wasn’t indoctrinating anyone with my beliefs about gay and lesbian and bi and trans and queer people? That was a lie.”

Of course, it was a lie, but she wasn’t finished.

“All 25 years of my career as an LGBTQ activist, since the very first time as a 16-year-old I went and stood shaking and breathless in front of eleven people to talk about My Story, I have been on a consistent campaign of trying to change people’s minds about us,” she said. “I want to make them like us. That is absolutely my goal. I want to make your children like people like me and my family, even if that goes against the way you have interpreted the teachings of your religion.”

Notice the boldness that comes from this woman! Notice the fact that she even throws in the root of her problem and that is “religion,” or more appropriately, what God has said about her sinful behavior.

Since she isn’t backing down and since parents in America seem to be oblivious to what the public indoctrination centers in America are allowing to be taught to young people, including young children, she is finishing up six books that portray sodomy and perversion in all its depraved glory as normal and without shame.

Bergman, like many today, know no shame (Zep. 3:5). They parade what is shameful (Rom. 1:27) around in the open and expose young impressionable minds to it (Matt. 18:6).

When she addressed the issue of why she became interested in children’s literature, notice her response. Though she claimed that becoming a parent was a partial reason for it, she then added this: “I was getting a nightly practicum in how the books a kid hears at bedtime affect their sleep and also their dreams (both in the micro and the macro sense).”

Now, I’m not going to assume what she means here, but understanding that this woman has a depraved mind in every sense of the word, what is the issue with her noticing sleep and dreams? Is there something going on here that isn’t being told?

While she is correct in saying that our communication with children is quite effective via storytelling (something even the Lord Jesus engaged in), it is the truth that needs to be conveyed in storytelling, not perversions and not lies. Bergman is the promoter of lies and I can say that with her own approval, since she admits openly in her op-ed that she is a liar.

Bergman wants people to know that sexual deviants exist. That is a given. Everyone knows that already, but she uses it as a means to taint, stain and pervert the minds of young people in America. Friends, that is unacceptable. In most states it is a crime not only to engage in sodomy, as Bergman does, but it is also a crime to contribute to the delinquency of a minor, which she is most surely doing.

So, what is Bergman’s final statement in the matter? Glad you asked.

“I would be happy — delighted, overjoyed I tell you — to cause those children to disagree with their families on the subject of LGBTQ people,” she wrote. “If that makes me an indoctrinator, I accept it. Let me be honest — I am not even a little bit sorry.”

Open, unrepentant and still at war with her Creator, Bergman blurts out the truth that Bible believing Christians have been saying all along. So, America will you now believe what your friends, the Christians, have been telling you, seeing that the God-hater has openly declared that we have been telling the truth the entire time? What will you do about it? What should be done to such people that do this to your children?

As always, I encourage every God-fearing parent to take the command of God seriously in Deuteronomy 6 and teach their own children, protecting them from deviant predators, liars and indoctrinators like S. Bear Bergman. I don’t have hate in my heart towards Bergman, I pity her. For unless she repents of her sinful behavior, she will face an angry God (Heb. 10:29) that will meet out a just punishment for her crimes against Him and against these little ones.

Finally, for those that think me “hateful,” “homophobic” and “intolerant,” I ask you do you care more about what people label you than you do protecting the most innocent among us from people like S. Bear Bergman? I would hope you do, but if those are the first thoughts that come to mind, I guess I have to question whether or not you do.


Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/03/open-sexual-deviant-ive-been-indoctrinating-americas-kids-to-be-sodomites-and-i-lied-about-it-am-not-sorry/#lOiMJ2zqvd9tMxj0.99

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

AD::: RESTRAIN THE JUDGES


Restrain the Judges

The Supreme Court has announced that it will be issuing a ruling on marriage by June of this year. In order to prevent the Roe v. Wade of Marriage, we must act now.

 

With the click of a button, you can mail a printed, personalized “Restraining Order” to the Supreme Court and every member of Congress with the message:

 

We the people of the United States affirm our right to self-governance and hereby issue a Restraining Order to the United States Supreme Court and our Federal Courts who would attempt to further usurp:

1. The sovereign vote of the American People
2. Our State Constitutions
3. The sacred institution of marriage between one man and one woman
4. Our Constitutionally protected First Amendment rights

 

Join us in calling upon Congress to use the authority granted by the U.S. Constitution to restrain federal judges and the Supreme Court
from undermining marriage any further!

Click here to read more about Restraining The Judges…
Restrain the Judges

THEY CROSSED THE RED LINE. When pastors in Idaho face jail time for refusing to “marry” homosexual couples, and the government demands Houston pastors turn over their sermons and private communications dealing with homosexuality, the red line of liberty has been crossed. There is no longer any doubt, the homosexual agenda brings with it an unprecedented assault on religious liberty and freedom of conscience against pastors, churches, business and facility owners, employees, public officials, organizations, ministries, and citizens.

Why does this matter? Because the right to vote matters. Because Freedom matters. And because Marriage matters. To Give up on marriage is to give up on freedom and also to give up on America. Giving up is not an option.

Restrain the Judges

Why Restrain Judges?

1.  Judges are the primary problem.
2.  It can be done by a majority vote.
3.  It’s been done before many times (for less important issues)
4.  We must advance marriage, freedom, and the right of our citizens to vote, rather than just wring our      hands and denounce the assault.
5. Greater is He that is in us than he that is in the world.

Restrain the Judges

We must restrain the judges now–before a single pastor goes to jail.

If federal judges won’t honor state marriage amendments, then we must reign in their jurisdiction through our elected representatives in Congress.

“The Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make.”
— Article 3, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution

This means that Congress can “make exceptions” to the kinds of cases Federal Courts can hear. On July 22, 2004 the U.S. House, by a vote of 233-194, approved Rep. John Hostettler’s (R-Ind.) H.R. 3313, “Marriage Protection Act” that removes from federal courts the jurisdiction to tamper with the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). If it had passed in the Senate, we wouldn’t be in this mess.

Restrain the Judges

Judicial restriction has also become law with a bill introduced by Senator Tom Daschle in 2002 to prohibit all federal courts from hearing cases about brush-clearing in his home state of South Dakota.

The long list of Federal statutes in which Congress successfully restricted the jurisdiction of the Federal courts includes the Norris-LaGuardia Act of 1932, the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, the Portal-to-Portal Pay Act of 1947, the 1965 Medicare Act, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the 1996 immigration amendments. Isn’t the protection of marriage just as important as any of those issues on which Congress effectively withdrew jurisdiction from the Federal courts?

[from Phyllis Schlafly’s testimony before the Subcommittee On the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, 2004]

Is not marriage more important than brush fires in South Dakota? When judges strike down the vote of the people to protect marriage, it ignites a brush fire against our liberty–which has now reached the doors
of the church–and must be immediately extinguished.

Restrain the Judges

Playing off our Pink Slip idea–where we sent more than 10 million Pink Slips to Congress–we can multiply our effectiveness and show of support by letting people send hundreds of “Restraining Orders” at once.

Post this on Social media and email this to your friends, the issue is urgent and time is short!

Restrain the Judges

Now it is your time to decide who will be receiving your “Restraining Order” letters. Make your voice heard in Washington… Loud and Clear!

We will personalize, print, and mail a “Restraining Order” letter from you to every member of the Senate and the House along with
each of the United States Supreme Court Justices.

Restrain the Judges 

This is the letter that we will send on your behalf

 

Restrain the Judges 

Restrain the Judges 

Restrain the Judges 

You have THREE OPTIONS to choose from to determine which individuals will receive a personalized “Restraining Order” letter from you.

 

—OPTION #1—

Eleven (11) “Restraining Order” Letters will be sent on your behalf for only $9.95Personalized Restraining Orders Sent to the Following:Speaker John Boehner
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell
The Supreme Court Justices (9) 

Restrain the Judges 

—OPTION #2—

Three Hundred and Seven (307) “Restraining Order” Letters
will be sent on your behalf for only $29.95307 Personalized Restraining Orders to every Republican in
Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court Justices:
Every US House Republican (246)
Every US Senate Republican (52)
The Supreme Court Justices (9) 

Restrain the Judges 

—OPTION #3—

Five Hundred and Forty-Four “Restraining Order” Letters
will be sent on your behalf for only $49.95544 Personalized Restraining Orders to ALL members of Congress &
the the U.S. Supreme Court Justices:
Every US House Member (435)
Every US Senator (100)
The Supreme Court Justices (9) 

Restrain the Judges 

Fill in the form below and we will begin the process of printing your personalized letters that will be mailed to Washington D.C.

Restrain the Judges

Your First Name (*)

Your Last Name (*)

Your Street Address (*)

Your City (*)

Your State (*)

Your Zip Code (*)

Your Email (*)

Your Phone Number

We will be sending your “Restraining Order” letters to Washington D.C. and they will be addressed directly to the individuals you will choose in the options below. Each letter will be personalized with your name on it.

Restrain the Judges

Would you like to send Personalized Letters to members of the Senate, Congress and the Supreme Court? Choose from the options below.(*)

No Payments Are Processed On This Page

 

(Your Choice Below Only Lets Us Know How Many Personalized Letters You Will Be Ordering and Paying For When You Follow The Ordering Directions On The Next Page.) Please Finish Completing This Form And Submitting This Page By Clicking The “Submit” Button Below. Yes – $ 9.95 for 11 Letters To Be Sent – John Boehner – Mitch McConnell & the 9 Supreme Court Justices Yes – $29.95 for 307 Letters To be Sent – All Republican Members of the House and Senate & the 9 Supreme Court Justices Yes – $49.95 for 544 Letters To Be Sent – ALL MEMBERS of the House and Senate & the 9 Supreme Court JusticesYou will order and pay for your personalized letters on the next page as well as have an opportunity to give an additional donation, if you desire, which will help with the printing and postage for this very important campaign.

 

* = Required Field


Please enter this code in the field and click on “Submit” Button below to send.
captcha

Sending ...


This “Restrain the Judges” campaign is being sponsored by the following organizations:
To find out more about these organizations, click on their logo to be immediately directed to their website

 

some text  AmericansForTruth.org  VisionAmericaAction.org  Judicial Action Group  Barbwire with Matt Barber  Defend The Family  American Family Association of Pennsylvania

     

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

ALERT::: A Supreme Court ruling looms over the fate of the Affordable Care Act ~ King v. Burwell next week


Supreme Court set to hear King v. Burwell next week
Wednesday, February 25, 2015

A Supreme Court ruling looms over the fate of the Affordable Care Act.
Video: http://launch.newsinc.com/share.html?trackingGroup=91388&siteSection=site_section_id&videoId=28639341

Bill of Health

Posted on March 10, 2015 by amoncrieff https://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2015/03/10/on-constitutional-remedies-in-king-v-burwell/

There is one concern about the JALSA brief that I have not yet addressed because I don’t think it’s relevant: If the Court invalidates the IRS Rule and then decides the constitutional merits and holds that the condition on subsidies is unconstitutionally coercive (as I argue it might be), what will the remedy be? Will the Court invalidate the whole statute? I haven’t addressed this question because I think there is no chance that the Court will decide the constitutional merits in this case. But Randy Barnett raised the question a few days ago, and now Josh Blackman has piled on with an argument that a constitutional holding would and should nullify the whole statute. As a predictive matter, I just don’t think that’s right. Even if the Court reached the constitutional merits at some point (which I don’t think they ever will), I think they’d sever the condition.

Josh’s analysis on this point arises from one thing and one thing only: Four justices joined an opinion in NFIB (without telling us who wrote it) in which they argued against severability of the Medicaid condition. Those four justices would have invalidated the whole statute on its first trip to the Supreme Court.

Okay, sure. But what does that tell us? First, we always knew that Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito were opposed to severance. They think Congress should be in charge of fixing unconstitutional statutes, not the Court. So it’s only Justice Kennedy’s willingness to join them that contains any information at all. But Kennedy was already on board with the portion of the opinion that argued the individual mandate was unconstitutional, and it would have been hard to sever the individual mandate from Obamacare’s market reforms. By the time they got to the Medicaid question, those four justices had already argued, on completely different grounds, that the whole statute should disappear. Is it really that shocking, then, that Kennedy joined an opinion arguing that the Medicaid portion could not be severed? That argument was basically cheap talk at that point. Furthermore, the four justices who joined that opinion made a conscious and very unusual decision not to attribute authorship—to present a united and indivisible front. If there were any disagreements among them as to the finer points of the opinion’s analysis, we wouldn’t know about them because none of the justices wanted to write a separate dissent. So, even if all four justices cared about the Medicaid severability analysis despite having already declared the whole statute invalid, we don’t really know what Kennedy himself thought about it.

But, of course, there’s an even more important point: That opinion only got four votes. To kill Obamacare, you need five, and you know you’ve lost the four liberal appointees before you start. So for Josh to be right, he needs all five of the conservatives to vote against severance. And Chief Justice Roberts agreed to sever. Here, Josh argues that Roberts agreed to sever because billions of dollars of preexisting federal funds were at stake. But that’s nonsense. Invalidating Obamacare in its entirety would have preserved those preexisting funds, too. A non-severance holding would have eliminated the possibility of new funds for the Medicaid expansion; it would have left preexisting Medicaid entirely intact.

Here’s what Roberts said in NFIB about the rules governing severability:

The question remains whether today’s holding affects other provisions of the Affordable Care Act. In considering that question, “[w]e seek to determine what Congress would have intended in light of the Court’s constitutional holding.” United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 246, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) (internal quotation marks omitted). Our “touchstone for any decision about remedy is legislative intent, for a court cannot use its remedial powers to circumvent the intent of the legislature.” Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New Eng., 546 U.S. 320, 330, 126 S.Ct. 961, 163 L.Ed.2d 812 (2006) (internal quotation marks omitted). The question here is whether Congress would have wanted the rest of the Act to stand, had it known that States would have a genuine choice whether to participate in the new Medicaid expansion. Unless it is “evident” that the answer is no, we must leave the rest of the Act intact. Champlin Refining Co. v. Corporation Comm’n of Okla., 286 U.S. 210, 234, 52 S.Ct. 559, 76 L.Ed. 1062 (1932). We are confident that Congress would have wanted to preserve the rest of the Act.

Applying that analysis here, there is simply no way that the Court would invalidate the whole statute if it held that states must, constitutionally, “have a genuine choice whether to participate” in establishing exchanges or not. There is not a straight-faced argument in the world that the 2010 Congress would have preferred to nuke Obamacare if it had known that exchange establishment would be optional for the states. I know that’s true because there is an extremely strong straight-faced argument that the 2010 Congress actually wanted exchange establishment to be optional for the states.

Of course, the fact that there’s a strong statutory argument for holding that subsidies are not in fact conditional on exchange establishment is why I think that this whole question is irrelevant. In a totally different part of NFIB, Roberts argued under the avoidance canon that “every reasonable construction [of a statute] must be resorted to, in order to save [the] statute from unconstitutionality.” And, in fact, he said that a construction must be resorted to even if that construction is not “the most natural interpretation.” Well, the IRS Rule is, at minimum, a reasonable construction, even if not the most natural interpretation, and it completely avoids this constitutional mess, including all of the questions about remedy.

Here’s the bottom line: Given that enjoining the conditionality of the subsidies is at least a plausible constitutional remedy under Roberts’s (winning) severability analysis in NFIB, there seems to me to be very little chance that the Court will invalidate the IRS Rule here and invite constitutional litigation. If it did that, there would be a very strong possibility, as the votes lined up during severability argument, that the Court would end up right back where it started, with the subsidies available nation-wide despite states’ exchange-establishment choices. But the justices would have insisted in dictating that outcome themselves through constitutional analysis rather than letting the political branches decide through statutory and policy analysis. No one on the Court wants that result. Better to avoid the whole mess.

P.S. Josh, just FYI, I’m hardly a fair-weather federalist.

Be Sociable, Share!

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Ed Schultz Hours Before Cop Ambush: What About Disarming Ferguson Police? ~ Michael Brown’s Mother: “F them two cops”


“What about just having them carry nightsticks and the authority to arrest?”

Just hours before the attack on Ferguson Police resulting in two officers suffering “serious injuries,” MSNBC host Ed Schultz suggested a new policy for the FPD: disarm them.

SCHULTZ: What about disarming the police? What about just having them carry nightsticks and the authority to arrest?

Schultz said the right-wing might think he’s crazy for it, and it would take guts to implement, but defended his idea by saying that some places don’t arm police and manage to maintain law and order:

SCHULTZ: I mean, it would take a brave person to do something like that, but if you really want — there really are places on the face of this earth that there are police officers that don’t carry firearms…
I know the right wing’s gonna think I’m crazy for thinking, but if you really want change, you have to institutionally show it to the people that you want to do this. That would be part of a big social engineering project if Ferguson’s going to turn around. That’s how I see it.

Two police officers were shot during a protest outside the Ferguson Police Department early Thursday morning, one officer reportedly shot in the face while the other was shot in the shoulder. According to witnesses, three shots were fired from a hill behind protestors. One officer was hit below the right eye, the bullet lodging near behind his ear. Despite both having sustained “serious injuries,” the two officers are expected to survive.

Video via TheDC. VIDEO: http://launch.newsinc.com/share.html?trackingGroup=69016&siteSection=dailycaller&videoId=28708185

Leslie Levon McFadden FB page

This pretty much says it all, as Michael Brown, Jr’s mother commented on her FB page about the cop shooting.

McSpadden has subsequently taken her page down, but here is the page sent to my team from persons monitoring the situation closely.

Holder: Ferguson shooter ‘disgusting,’ ‘punk’

While police still do not have a suspect in the shooting of two cops early Thursday morning in Ferguson, St. Louis County Police Chief Jon Belmar says a handgun was most likely the weapon used. VPC

20241 801 18 LINKEDIN 1124 COMMENTMORE

FERGUSON, Mo. — Missouri highway patrol and St. Louis County police were moving to take over security at any renewed protests Thursday night following the wounding of two officers hit by gunfire outside police headquarters in this city torn by racial unrest.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder sharply condemned the shootings of police Wednesday night as a “disgusting and cowardly attack.”

“What happened last night was a pure ambush,” Holder said. “This was not someone trying to bring healing to Ferguson. This was a damn punk, a punk, who was trying to sow discord.”

Mayor John Knowles was notified that the highway patrol and county would take over the security duties from the Ferguson police department “until further notice,” the county police department said in a statement.

Sgt, Brian Schellman, a spokesman for the St. Louis County police, said investigators interviewed several people regarding the shooting but made no arrests.

Just after 8 p.m., clergy gathered blocks from the Ferguson Police Department for a candlelight vigil. They prayed for the safety of the demonstrators and for the health of the two wounded police officers.

Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon was in St. Louis County to be briefed by local officials. He said the highway patrol and county police will be sending additional officers in anticipation of more protests Thursday night.

“I ask Missourians to join me in calling for calm in the wake of the cowardly and reprehensible ambush of two police officers who were acting to protect the public,” Nixon said. “I also thank all the brave law enforcement officers who selflessly risk their lives each day to keep communities safe.”

Police searched a home in Ferguson Thursday morning, following the shooting of two officers. According to neighbors, three people were taken away in handcuffs. A car was also towed from the home. VPC

Routine police service remains in the hands of the embattled Ferguson police department, whose chief resigned in the wake of scathing criticism of the force by the Justice Department for racially biased policing.

St. Louis County police chief Jon Belmar had called for a “measured response” to the shooting of the two officers around midnight Wednesday, but reserved the right to beef up security as warranted.

The two officers “took a very hard hit” and were seriously injured, but will not sustain long-term injuries, he said. They were released from the hospital Thursday morning.

“We were lucky by God’s grace that we didn’t lose two officers last night,” Belmar told reporters. “We could have buried two police officers over this. … It’s a miracle we haven’t had any instances similar to this in the summer and fall.”

Police recovered shell casings at the scene and fanned out across the city looking for the shooter.

A St. Louis County SWAT team stormed a home about four blocks from the police station Thursday morning, clambering on top off the roof, KSDK-TV reported.

Neighbors said three people were taken from the home in handcuffs. Police said they were taken in for questioning, but there were no immediate arrests.

The shootings occurred as demonstrators were winding up a protest following the resignation of the city’s police chief in the wake of a scathing Justice Department report alleging bias in the police department and court.

“This is really an ambush,” he said. “You can’t see it coming. You don’t understand that it’s going to happen and you’re basically defenseless from the fact that it is happening to you at the time. ”

Belmar said one of the officers, a 32-year-old, seven-year veteran from nearby Webster Groves, was shot below his right eye. The bullet lodged near his right ear, he said.

The second officer, a 41-year-old with 14 years on the St. Louis County force, was hit in the shoulder by a bullet that came out his back.

At the time of the shooting, Belmar said, the number of demonstrators had dwindled from around 150 to about 75 and the number of police at the scene had dropped to about 40.

He said the two wounded officers were standing in a line of 20 to 25 other officers when three or four shots were fired from about 125 feet away.

Two police officers are hospitalized after being shot outside the Ferguson Police Department. One officer was hit in the face, the other in the shoulder. Protesters gathered there after the police chief announced his resignation on Wednesday. VPC

“I feel very confident that whoever did this was there for the wrong reason, not the right reason, and came there for whatever nefarious reason it was,” Belmar said in a news conference. “But I do feel like there was an unfortunate association with that gathering.”

Jeff Roorda, who heads the St. Louis Police Officers Association, said the shooting sent a chill through the law enforcement community.

He called on state and county officials to restrict protests to daytime hours.

“This is a very volatile situation,” Roorda said. “You have outside agitators racing to be here. This isn’t safe for police, community or peaceful protesters.”

Roorda said he’s spoken to the police officer who was shot in the shoulder and that he was doing remarkably well considering the circumstances.

Police officers at the scene last night said were jolted by the timing of the incident. The protests were breaking up and only a few dozen demonstrators were left when the shots were fired.

“There’s been a recurring phenomenon throughout the protests where you see the flash-points, the bad things coming ,” he said. “But last night, as it was described to me by many of the cops that were here here, it wasn’t that way. The crowd was just mulling around. A lot of the protesters were starting to disperse. No one saw it coming.”

The shootings came hours after Ferguson officials announced that Police Chief Thomas Jackson, who will step down March 19.

Jackson, 57, became the third top city official to leave following the release of the Justice Department report. Judge Ronald Brockmeyer and City Manager John Shaw resigned earlier this week.

Lt. Col. Al Eickhoff is serving as acting chief until the city completes a nationwide search for a new police chief, the city said in a news release. Jackson will receive a severance payment of approximately $100,000 and health insurance for one year.

Belmar said he has called for a “measured response” to the shootings, but reserved the right to call upon the highway patrol for additional help if necessary.

He said police are planning to assess their security plans outside the Ferguson Police Department and talk to protesters and community leaders about how to move forward.

When asked about security in the area moving forward, Belmar said it is very difficult to sustain this kind of situation without injuries to the public or police officers.

“I think we need to re-evaluate that, and that’s one of the things I’ve been doing since my phone rang at midnight tonight,” said Belmar. “We’re going to be looking for different ways to approach this. Obviously my first priority is to the community, but that’s followed very very closely to my police officers and making sure that they’re able to do what they’re supposed to do out there in a safe manner.”

President Obama condemned the shootings on Thursday, saying in a tweet that “violence against police is unacceptable.” “Our prayers are with the officers in MO,” he wrote. “Path to justice is one all of us must travel together.”

St. Louis County Executive Steve Stenger said doesn’t believe the shooting will set back any gains made in the city.

“I don’t consider this incident a setback toward healing,” he said. “I don’t believe it’s going to affect any healing process that is going on in the community. I think the community at large is fully supportive of these police officers and probably wishes the very best for them.”

Knowles and the Ferguson City Council released a statement thanking law enforcement agencies that have helped the city in the past seven months and reaching out the community.

“While we respect the right to peacefully protest, we cannot continue to move forward under threats of violence and destruction to our community,” the statement said. “We ask our residents and clergy in this area to partner with us as we make our way through this process.”

The shootings came as a shock to the crowds gathered outside the police department. DeRay McKesson, 29, one of the most visible protesters in Ferguson, was sitting in his car and about to tweet that the crowd was thinning out when he heard about four gunshots to his right.

“It was like pow, pow, pow, pow — like four consistent shots,” he said. “I was looking straight up at the police department and I see an officer fall and I see officers surround him.”

McKesson said protesters, who had been gathered at the police department since 8 p.m. Wednesday, hit the ground as soon as the shots rang out and scattered trying to get to safety amid the chaos.

“Every single gun any officer had was drawn and they were all behind something,” he said, adding that officers ran and ducked behind cars and the department building.

St. Louis County Alderman posted a Vine showing people crawling on the ground after police reacted to the gunshots.

Heather De Mian, 44, of St. Charles, Mo., was live streaming the scene outside of the police department when the shots rang out.

“Those gunshots went right past my head,” said De Mian, who is in a wheelchair and tried to duck down. “I tried to go down low so my head wasn’t sticking out.”

She said soon after the shots a swarm of St. Louis County Police crime scene cars showed up and later, a group of officers marched up the hill on a side street in the direction of where the sound of gunshots had come from.

Meanwhile, De Mian is adamant that the shooters were not with demonstrators.

“The shots came from a block away from the protests,” she said. “It’s incredibly dangerous to try to link the protesters to this without evidence. It could be someone trying to frame the protesters or someone who was aiming at the protesters and was a bad shot. Whoever shot put everyone’s life in danger.”

An Aug. 9 shooting of unarmed African-American teen Michael Brown by white Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson set off weeks of unrest and violence in the St. Louis suburb.

Brown’s family issued a statement Thursday condemning the police shootings. “We reject any kind of violence directed toward members of law enforcement,” the statement said. They also denounced the actions of “stand-alone agitators” who might try to derail the a peaceful movement addressed at police brutalit

Wilson was not charged in Brown’s killing and the Justice Department found no reason to bring civil rights charges against him.

Contributing: William M. Welch in Los Angeles; Jimmy Bernhard, KSDK-TV, St. Louis; Associated Press

Two St. Louis County Police officers were shot outside the Ferguson Police Department early Thursday. St. Louis County Police Chief Jon Belmar said one officer was shot in the shoulder and one was shot in the face. Both officers were conscious.

 

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

“Journalistic” incest? YES! There is incest in what they laughingly call journalism!


“Journalistic” incest?

Wonder why our news sounds the same? Here’s the answer

Ah, journalistic incest

10898067_899512683426697_3296001466804767708_n.png?oh=bf4a51840e4784016a5e4e2c18f25d2b&oe=55427D43

IF YOU HAD A HUNCH THE NEWS SYSTEM WAS SOMEWHAT RIGGED AND YOU COULDN’T PUT YOUR FINGER ON IT, THIS MIGHT HELP YOU SOLVE THE PUZZLE.

ABC News executive producer Ian Cameron is married to Susan Rice, National Security Adviser.

CBS President David Rhodes is the brother of Ben Rhodes, Obama’s Deputy National Security Adviser for Strategic Communications.

ABC News correspondent Claire Shipman is married to former Whitehouse Press Secretary Jay Carney

ABC News and Univision reporter Matthew Jaffe is married to Katie Hogan, Obama’s Deputy Press Secretary

ABC President Ben Sherwood is the brother of Obama’s Special Adviser Elizabeth Sherwood

CNN President Virginia Moseley is married to former Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Secretary Tom Nides.

And now you know why it is no surprise the media usually goes very easy on Obama’s many errors.

Ya think there might be a little bias in the news?

Ya Think?

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

ISIS Was Created By Western Interests To Remove Syrian Government or Is ISIS Is The Product Of Islamic Heritage


MEMRI

Special Dispatch | 5994 | March 12, 2015

 
Canadian Imams In Anti-ISIS Fatwa: ISIS Was Created By Western Interests To Remove Syrian Government; Joining It Is A Mortal Sin

On March 11, 2015, the Islamic Supreme Council of Canada, a Calgary-based body headed by Imam Syed Soharwardy, issued a ‘historic fatwa’ against joining the Islamic State (ISIS). The fatwa states that ISIS is a ‘khawarij’ group, and that whoever joins it or encourages others to do so in any way is committing a grave sin that excludes him from the fold of Islam.

The fatwa, signed by several dozen imams from across Canada, explains that ISIS is actually a group of ‘strangers’ that was ‘created by the funding of Western countries to overthrow the Syrian regime,’ and that it was ‘planted in Muslim countries to serve anti-Islam interests by deceiving Muslims in the name of Islam.’ It adds that ‘ISIS and other terrorists are using the policies of the United States and other Western countries in the Middle East as an excuse to control Muslim sentiments and then use them for their own political and personal gain.’  

The authors of the fatwa clarify that they strongly condemn those policies of the Western countries, including Canada itself, which are ‘completely unjust, based upon Islamophobia, bias and intolerance towards Muslims.’ They also ‘condemn the highly destructive and hateful role of the media in intentionally promoting intolerance towards Islam and Muslims.’ However, they say, Muslims cannot counter anti-Islamic efforts by choosing the path of ISIS, Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, Boko Haram, and other organizations of their ilk. This is because, even while countering anti-Islamic aggression, Muslims are utterly forbidden to commit many of the deeds that ISIS has committed, such as beheading enemies, Muslim or non-Muslim, or driving them from their homes; murdering Muslims, including religious scholars, who disagree with them; and destroying mosques and tombs. The fatwa also stresses that only governments are authorized to declare a war, and that the Islamic State does not have the status of an actual state or government.

Turning to the issue of Canada’s security, the authors emphasize that Canadian Muslims have a religious duty to protect this country against anyone who wishes to harm it. They note that Canada is home to over one million Muslims who enjoy complete freedom of worship, with over 1,000 mosques and over 700 Islamic schools across the country. Hence, any attack on Canada is an attack on the freedom of Canadian Muslims. The fatwa therefore states that ‘any person who inspires people to cause harm to Canada and Canadians must immediately be reported to the Police.’

The following are excerpts from the fatwa:

“A Few Years Ago, ISIS/ISIL Was Created By The Funding Of Western Countries To Overthrow The Syrian Regime”

“[The] overwhelming majority of worldwide Islamic scholars have already individually declared ISIS/ISIL un-Islamic ‘outsiders’ (KHAWARIJ) group.  The attached Islamic edict (Fatwa) by the Canadian Muslim Imams and scholars is the first formal Fatwa in the world regarding ISIS/ISIL and its recruitment activities… This Fatwa has been issued in order to help Muslims especially youth to understand what Islamic laws and ethics stand for and how ISIS/ISIL is violating those laws and ethics. The consistent and constant misinterpretation and misuse of the verses of the Holy Qur’an and Hadith of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) by the ISIS/ISIL to control Muslim lands and people should be exposed and condemned.

“We hope this Fatwa will help Muslims and non-Muslims to understand what Islam requires from its followers. We also hope this Fatwa will help the Canadian government, Ministers and the Media not to link Islam, Muslims and Islamic terminologies e.g. Jihad with the violence and extremism caused by terrorists organizations like ISIS/ISIL.

We encourage other Muslim Imams and scholars to endorse this Fatwa OR issue their own fatwa in order to help Muslims not to be misguided by ISIS/ISIL…

“O ye who believe! If a wicked person comes to you with any news, ascertain the truth, lest ye harm people unwittingly, and afterwards become full of repentance for what ye have done. (49:6) When the Hypocrites come to thee, they say, ‘We bear witness that thou art indeed the Messenger of Allah.’ Yea, Allah knoweth that thou art indeed His Messenger, and Allah beareth witness that the Hypocrites are indeed liars. (63:1). There are several other verses in the holy Qur’an and there are several Hadith of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) clearly warning Muslims that there are and will be people apparently claiming to be Muslims but who, in fact, will be imposters who deceive Muslims in order to destroy them. Muslims must not trust such individuals or groups…

“No Muslim ever heard the name of ‘Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS)’ OR ‘Islamic State of Iraq and Levant (ISIL)’ OR ‘Da’esh’ (داعش) OR the names of its leaders until few years ago. The sudden appearance of hitherto completely unknown persons, trying to take over the Muslim lands and the leadership of the Muslims in the Middle East, is very doubtful and suspicious. A few years ago, ISIS/ISIL was created by the funding of Western countries to overthrow the Syrian regime. These strangers cannot be trusted. Their claim to establish a ‘Caliphate’ (Khilafah Al-Islamiyah) is very suspicious, and cannot be trusted. The reasons are discussed later in this Fatwa…”

Read The Full Report

Tweet this report | Post this report on Facebook | MEMRI Apps available for:
Unsubscribe | Forward to a Friend | Sign Up for More | Donate | Visit Our Site
For assistance, please contact MEMRI at memri@memri.org.
P.O. Box 27837, Washington, DC 20038-7837
Phone: (202) 955-9070 | Fax: (202) 955-9077The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) is an independent, non-profit organization that translates and analyzes the media of the Middle East. Copies of articles and documents cited, as well as background information, are available on request.

MEMRI holds copyrights on all translations. Materials may only be used with proper attribution.

OR

MEMRI The Middle East Media Research Institute
Kuwaiti Researcher Abdulazziz Al-Qattan: ISIS Is The Product Of Islamic Heritage
The following report is from MEMRI’s Counter-Radicalization Initiative.In a recent TV show, Kuwaiti researcher Abdulazziz Al-Qattan said that the ISIS ideology existed long before the emergence of ISIS and Al-Qaeda, and that it was a product of Islamic heritage. “All the books of Islamic heritage, without exception… have enough ISIS ideology to turn your hair white,” said Al-Qattan, speaking on Al-Mayadeen TV on March 3, 2015.

Following are excerpts:

Click here to view this clip on MEMRI TV

4821MTV A.jpg

Abdulaziz Al-Qattan: “ISIS did not come out of nowhere. It’s not an aberration. By no means. ISIS adopts the Salafi-Wahhabi ideology of Al-Qaeda. If you look at Durur Al-Saniyah by Muhammad Ibn Abd Al-Wahhab, you will see that ISIS is implementing the ideas of that book to the letter. They are doing it step by step, word by word.

[…]

4821MTV B.jpg

“The problem of us Arabs is that we are not being honest with ourselves. We do not acknowledge our mistakes. We refuse to break away from that heritage. Our Islamic heritage is a minefield of these deviant ideas. Unfortunately, even some contemporary muftis, sheiks, and Islamic scholars subscribe to this reactionary ideology and to this backwardness. To this day, some of them consider photography to be prohibited polytheism, and view statuses as idols that are worshipped instead of Allah.

4821MTV C.jpg

“Even in the days of the Islamic conquests, ‘Amr Ibn Al-‘As did not destroy the Sphinx and did not shatter statues in Egypt. I cannot imagine Islam, or any civilization, without art. I cannot imagine the beauty of Islam without art. Art is sublime. Art means progress. Art means civilization. Can you possibly imagine humanity without art? Inconceivable! Inconceivable!

[…]

4821MTV D.jpg

“The ISIS [ideology] existed even before ISIS and Al-Qaeda emerged, but we turned a blind eye, and some Arab governments still prefer not to face the plain truth. All the books of Islamic heritage, without exception – from all Islamic sects and denominations – have enough ISIS ideology to turn your hair white. Therefore, what we need to do is sift through Islamic heritage. We must go back to the book of Allah, for it gives guidance to humanity. Islam does not, under any circumstances, run counter to human nature. Allah created Man free and gave him freedom of thought, but the problem is that the Muslims have begun to worship people. We have begun to worship our heritage. We have begun to worship books.

[…]

“I say “Islamic heritage,” but that is not what it is. It is the heritage of the jurisprudents, not of the Prophet Muhammad. The books of Islamic heritage – Al-Bukhari and Muslim hadith collections, and the other canonical hadith books, as well as the Kitab Al-Kafi and all the other books of the Shiites… All these books need to be sifted through by real institutions. “These stories should be sifted through in order to filter out all their blemishes. Politics played a role in the evolvement of this heritage. The Islamic scholars of the Sultan’s court played a role in this. The hadith narrators were not infallible. Some of them were liars, cheats, and so on.”

[…]

View The Clip

Tweet this report | Post this report on Facebook | MEMRI Apps available for: Available on the iPhone App Store  Available on the Android App Store
Unsubscribe | Forward to a Friend | Sign Up for More | Donate | Visit Our Site  
For assistance, please contact MEMRI at memri@memri.org.
P.O. Box 27837, Washington, DC 20038-7837
Phone: (202) 955-9070 | Fax: (202) 955-9077The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) is an independent, non-profit organization that translates and analyzes the media of the Middle East. Copies of articles and documents cited, as well as background information, are available on request.

MEMRI holds copyrights on all translations. Materials may only be used with proper attribution.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Ferguson Protestor Taunts Cops After Shooting


Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Clinton Emails May Reveal Shady Donations


Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

‘American Sniper’ Now Highest Grossing Film of 2014 ~ WH: Obama Emailed with Hillary’s Private Account


TR DAILY March 10, 2015

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Must See: “The America You Believe You Live In… Is Not A Reality”


We want to believe we live in the land of the free, but as you’ll see in the micro-documentary from Future Money Trends below, that America no longer exists.

The rule of law has been supplanted. Those who govern do so with an iron fist. They serve themselves at the expense of the people who elected them.

What they teach our children at school and what they disseminate to the general public via the mainstream airwaves is an illusion.

The America you want to believe in… The America you may even believe you live in… is not a reality.
The America you have read and learned about is a foreign nation. The America you want to know is in the past… it died long ago.
Its current population has been hard wired to believe in something that is nothing more than an illusion…

We’ve been told so many fairy tales that the average American is now living in a delusional state. He has been taught that he is free when he is not free. Americans today are forced to buy services from private companies, forced to surrender part of their wages… they even need a permission slip to travel abroad… The average American commits three arguable felonies a day…

The State has become a complete burden on the people and is a vicious master that seems to get away with anything it wants. Some Americans are now being forced to even pay the debts of their dead parents.

Watch: Life, Liberty, and the Sociopaths that Rule Us

Source http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/must-see-the-america-you-believe-you-live-in-is-not-a-reality_03062015

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Al Sharpton Activist: Detroit Water Almost as Bad as Gas Chamber for Jews


2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

TR DAILY March 5, 2015

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

MEMRI: Pakistani Urdu Weekly Promotes Holocaust Denial: ‘Jews Have Been Taking Full Advantages By Howling About The Holocaust'; Egyptian TV Host Gaber Al-Karmoty: The Jews Are Using The Holocaust To Suck The Blood Of The Germans


The Middle East Media Research Institute

MEMRI Daily: March 5, 2015

 

Special Dispatch No. 5985

Pakistani Urdu Weekly Promotes Holocaust Denial: ‘Jews Have Been Taking Full Advantages By Howling About The Holocaust’

03052015_sasp.jpg

Screenshot of the original article

Following are excerpts from an article in Zarb-e-Momin (Strike of the Faithful Muslim), an Urdu-language jihadist weekly openly sold across Pakistan. Zarb-e-Momin, which began publishing in the early 1990s, has been linked to the Al-Rashid Trust, a banned charity connected to Al-Qaeda and other jihadist organizations in Pakistan.

The article, titled “Who is tolerant?” written by Waqar Ahmed (who is possibly based in Australia), questions the Holocaust and accuses Jews of promoting it for their advantage. The beginning the article, which is not included below, features a fictional scenario in which a visiting Muslim is told by a local not to talk about the Holocaust.

Following are excerpts from the article, as translated from Urdu:

“On The One Hand, Jews Beat The Drum Of Freedom Of Expression, But On The Other Hand, They Do Not Let Any Occasion Pass To Strangle Truth With Their Iron Hands”

“[…] on this topic [of the Holocaust], research aside, even talking about it is a crime here [presumably in Australia]. Anyone who investigates it is either pushed to obscurity or suffers the fate of imprisonment. An Australian history teacher was given three years’ imprisonment. The convicted professor… had, after investigating, refused to accept the veracity of Holocaust…”

“On the one hand, Jews beat the drum of freedom of expression, but on the other hand, they do not let any occasion pass to strangle truth with their iron hands. How is it possible to stamp a seal on someone’s tongue in the current era and imprison his thoughts? I will definitely work on this subject, will expose to the whole world what is reality and what is fiction…”

View The Report

 

MEMRI TV Clip No. 4805

Egyptian TV Host Gaber Al-Karmoty: The Jews Are Using The Holocaust To Suck The Blood Of The Germans

In a January 15 address on the Egyptian ON TV channel, TV host Gaber Al-Karmoty complained that the Holocaust was “off limits,” while drawing cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad was not. “I’m talking about what people call the Nazi Holocaust, for which they are still sucking the blood of the Germans. Who? The Jews!” said Al-Karmoty.

Click here to view this clip on MEMRI TV

Capture03051.JPG

Gaber Al-Karmoty: “According to the principles of free speech, the Holocaust is off limits. Have you heard about the Holocaust of Germany and the Jews? I’m talking about what people call the Nazi Holocaust, for which they are still sucking the blood of the Germans. Who? The Jews! Israel goes on and on about this every year. They weep and cry about the Holocaust, the blood, and the pain, and they cry: We were tormented, we want reparations, whatever… But when along came a French intellectual like Roger Garaudy, and said: ‘The Holocaust was just a show. It doesn’t make sense’… What did they do to the man Garaudy? They humiliated him.

Capture03023.JPG

[…]

“Garaudy published the book The Founding Myths of Modern Israel. Consequently, he was tried in France for doubting the Holocaust of the Jews. God Almighty! There is no god but Allah! Doesn’t this fall under freedom of thought? He believed that the Jewish Holocaust was nothing but a show. A film. After all, you allowed people to curse the Prophet Muhammad. Did anyone do anything about these people? No. Did anyone tell them they were doing something wrong? No. They depicted our Prophet Muhammad as a terrorist, God have mercy. Nobody asked them: ‘What do you think you are doing?’ Did they send to the cartoonist to prison? No, they said this is freedom of speech.”

View The Clip

Tweet this report | Post this report on Facebook | MEMRI Apps available for: Available on the iPhone App Store  Available on the Android App Store
Unsubscribe | Forward to a Friend | Sign Up for More | Donate | Visit Our Site
For assistance, please contact MEMRI at memri@memri.org.
P.O. Box 27837, Washington, DC 20038-7837
Phone: (202) 955-9070 | Fax: (202) 955-9077

The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) is an independent, non-profit organization that translates and analyzes the media of the Middle East. Copies of articles and documents cited, as well as background information, are available on request.

MEMRI holds copyrights on all translations. Materials may only be used with proper attribution.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

First Transit Approve Prayer Breaks for Muslim Drivers


First Transit operates bus services across the USA.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Transit

First Transit is owned by First Group, UK.
http://www.firsttransit.com/about-us/history

Part of the USA First Transit network is a contract they have based in Houston, at George Bush Intercontinental Airport, where they transport United Airline’s employees, to and from the employee parking lot, to and from the terminal.

One full time employee, a Pakistani Muslim, has been given permission by First Transit’s Cincinnati corporate office to take prayer breaks during his shift.

http://www.firsttransit.com/about-us

This discriminates against other employees as the other, non-Muslim, employees have to call on their radio, to their supervisor, requesting a break. If it fits with the rotation/flow at that time then they are given permission to take a break. Also, only one driver at a time can take a break. However, the Muslim employee merely calls the supervisor and tells her/him that he is taking his break. There is no consideration given to whether another driver is on break or whether passengers are waiting. He has been known to drive past passengers so that he can get to his break and pray. Apparently, he has to pray at specific times of the day. This has been approved by the corporate human resources department.

Drivers are usually allowed two bathroom breaks, over and above their usual meal break, during their shift. However, the Muslim driver has been known to take up to 6 breaks in one shift; not all prayer breaks obviously. He has had breaks of up to 20 minutes on occasions also.

Several drivers have raised the matter with their supervisor/local management due to discrimination against non-Muslims. Their concerns have been ridden over by the fact that the corporate office has allowed this. So, local management have no control over it at all.

These are facts, witnessed first hand.
Kind regards, Belly

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Bill Whittle: The Leader of the Free World isn’t Obama


TR DAILY March 6, 2015

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

ISLAMIC TRIBUNAL CONFIRMED IN TEXAS; ATTORNEY CLAIMS ‘IT’S VOLUNTARY’


Texas has had SHaria courts since at least the last 15 years…Daniel Pipes reported on it long ago!

Islamic Tribunal - DallasIslamic Tribunal Website

by BOB PRICE27 Jan 20151882

An Islamic Tribunal using Sharia law in Texas has been confirmed by Breitbart Texas. The tribunal is operating as a non-profit organization in Dallas. One of the attorneys for the tribunal said participation and acceptance of the tribunal’s decisions are “voluntary.”

Breitbart Texas spoke with one of the “judges,” Dr. Taher El-badawi. He said the tribunal operates under Sharia law as a form of “non-binding dispute resolution.” El-badawi said their organization is “a tribunal, not arbitration.” A tribunal is defined by Meriam-Webster’s Dictionary as “a court or forum of justice.” The four Islamic attorneys call themselves “judges” not “arbitrators.”

El-badawi said the tribunal follows Sharia law to resolve civil disputes in family and business matters. He said they also resolve workplace disputes.

In matters of divorce, El-badawi said that “while participation in the tribunal is voluntary, a married couple cannot be considered divorced by the Islamic community unless it is granted by the tribunal.” He compared their divorce, known as “Talaq,” as something similar to the Catholic practice of annulment in that the church does not recognize civil divorce proceedings as ending a marriage.

He also said there is a difference between how a man and a woman can request a divorce under their system. “The husband can request the divorce directly from the tribunal,” El-badawi stated. “The wife must go to an Imam who will request the divorce for her.” He called it “two paths to the same result.” The practice of Khula is the process where a wife can initiate a divorce proceeding and where the husband can agree to the divorce in exchange for a financial compensation. It appears the wife must agree to give up any claim to the “dower” that was not already paid or to return it if it has already been paid. Once the financial issues are resolved the husband can then proclaim the Talaq (divorce).

READ MORE: http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2015/01/27/hold-islamic-tribunal-confirmed-in-texas-its-voluntary-says-attorney/

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Connecticut Citizen speaks out on Sandy Hook hoax at State committee hearing


The State of Connecticut’s Public Safety and Security Committee (PSSC) is a joint standing committee of the Connecticut General Assembly and contains members of the Senate and the House. In the Connecticut Legislature, there are no separate chamber committees.
PSSC is charged with matters relating to homeland security, the Department of Public Safety, including state police, state organized task force on crime, municipal police training, fire marshals, the fire safety code and the state building code, civil preparedness and legalized gambling, and military and veterans’ affairs, except veterans’ pensions.
The Public Safety and Security Committee of 2015 has 15 Democratic members and 10 Republican members. The Chair of the committee is Sen. Timothy Larson, Democrat, who is also the General Assembly’s Majority Whip. For the names of the other 24 committee members, go here.
Connecticut Public Safety & Security Committee
On March 3, 2015, at a public hearing of the Public Safety and Security Committee on SB 1011: An Act Concerning the Training of Security Personnel, a private citizen named Maureen Crowley boldly spoke out on the Sandy Hook fraud.
Maureen Crowley

Maureen Crowley

Below is the transcript I took of Crowley’s testimony:

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

See Video and Read More: http://www.dcclothesline.com/2015/03/06/connecticut-citizen-speaks-out-on-sandy-hook-hoax-at-state-committee-hearing/

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

MEMRI: Director Of Al-Arabiya’s English Website: Obama Is The Only One Who Fails To Realize The Iranian Danger; Former Egypt IAEA Delegate: Arab Nuclear Weapons Are Crucial To Creating Strategic Balance In Region


The Middle East Media Research Institute

MEMRI The Middle East Media Research Institute

MEMRI Daily: March 4, 2015

 

Special Dispatch No. 5983

Director Of Al-Arabiya’s English Website: Obama Is The Only One Who Fails To Realize The Iranian Danger

In a March 3, 2015 article on Al-Arabiya’s English-language website, the website’s editor, Faisal J. ‘Abbas, wrote that Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is right to warn Obama against an agreement with Iran. He remarked that, while it was rare for any reasonable person to agree with Netanyahu on anything, the Israeli PM had “hit the nail on the head” when he said that Middle Eastern countries were collapsing and that terror organizations, mostly backed by Iran, were filling in the vacuum. The problem with Iran, he explained, is not just its nuclear ambitions but also its expansionist aspirations, for the sake of which it backs various Shi’ite militias as well as Sunni ones, including Al-Qaeda. Moreover, he said, while in the past Iran carried out its terrorist activities in secret, today it carries them out in the open. For instance, it does not bother to hide the presence of Qods Force commander Qassem Soleimani in Syria.

‘Abbas noted that, paradoxically, while fear of Iran is the only thing that Arabs and Israelis agree on, the only one who fails to realize the danger is U.S. President Obama, “who is now infamous for being the latest pen-pal of the Supreme Leader of the World’s biggest terrorist regime,” ‘Ali Khamenei.

The following are excerpts from his article, lightly edited for clarity.

5983A.jpg
Faisal J. ‘Abbas (image: English.alarabiya.net)

“In Just A Few Words, Mr. Netanyahu Managed To Accurately Summarize A Clear And Present Danger”

“It is extremely rare for any reasonable person to ever agree with anything Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says or does. However, one must admit, Bibi did get it right, at least when it came to dealing with Iran. The Israeli PM managed to hit the nail right on the head when he said that Middle Eastern countries are collapsing and that ‘terror organizations, mostly backed by Iran, are filling in the vacuum’ during a recent ceremony held in Tel Aviv…

“In just a few words, Mr. Netanyahu managed to accurately summarize a clear and present danger, not just to Israel (which obviously is his concern), but to other U.S. allies in the region. What is absurd, however, is that despite this being perhaps the only thing that brings together Arabs and Israelis (as it threatens them all), the only stakeholder that seems not to realize the danger of the situation is President Obama, who is now infamous for being the latest pen-pal of the Supreme Leader of the World’s biggest terrorist regime: Ayottallah Ali Khamenei (Although, the latter never seems to write back!)”

Read The Full Report

 

Special Dispatch No. 5982

Former Egypt IAEA Delegate: Arab Nuclear Weapons Are Crucial To Creating Strategic Balance In Region

In a November 18, 2014 article in the London-based Arab daily Al-Hayat, Egyptian former MP Dr. Mustafa Al-Fiqi, who was the chairman of the Egyptian parliament’s Foreign Relations Committee during the Mubarak era and also served as Egypt’s delegate to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in the late 90s, called on Arab countries to launch a major nuclear program in order to restore strategic balance to the region. According to him, Arabs cannot remain besieged by Israeli and Iranian nuclear might, which are like a sword at their necks. Al-Fiqi stressed that in the current age, force is the best way to achieve deterrence, restore rights, and achieve justice, and therefore Arab nuclear power was an inevitable necessity. He added that the U.S., the West, and Israel are attempting to thwart any Arab attempt to develop nuclear weapons, hinting that they were behind the assassination of Arab nuclear scientists in recent years.

It should be mentioned that already in 2002, Al-Fiqi published a series of articles calling on Arabs to attain nuclear weapons to create a strategic balance vis-à-vis Israel.

The following are excerpts from the article:

Force Is The Path To Justice; Nuclear Weapons Will Give The Arab Nation Value And Status

“In recent decades there have been stories and studies regarding the Arabs’ nuclear capabilities and their future chances in light of the current regional and international situation. I am among those who believe that nuclear capabilities are not just a deterrent but also an expression of patriotism and of the homeland’s international prestige…

5982A.jpg
Dr. Mustafa Al-Fiqi

“First, the might of nations and peoples is measured by their ability to defend themselves and preserve their national security and supreme interests. All this is not possible without recognized and known military capabilities, since we live in a world where justice and rights are only attained by the logic of force, whether by using it or by threatening to use it. There are so many just causes where the aggrieved side cannot find redress because the other side usurps, rampages, occupies land, and tramples holy sites in the full sight of the entire world, while ignoring [international] legitimacy, simply because it can and because it is far from deterrence and safe from punishment. I am certainly not calling to transform countries into weapons depots… but [only] warning against foregoing rights or underestimating [the importance] of obtaining force, since this is the way to attain rights and realize justice.

“Therefore, I am not surprised by the repeated claims by Arab writer Jihad Al-Khazen [former editor and current columnist for Al-Hayat] that it is important for some Arab countries to launch a large-scale nuclear program, because it is time to do so in light of the Israeli nuclear arsenal, which includes over 200 nuclear warheads… We [repeatedly] raise this issue because we believe that nuclear weapons – regardless of the risks, cost, and difficulties they entail – will give the [Arab] nation value and status at a time when it is facing unprecedented foreign and domestic threats.

“Second, use of peaceful nuclear energy – from producing electricity, to desalinating sea water, as well as dozens of [other] vital activities that are crucial to modern societies – has become a need that cannot be ignored… The difference between peaceful nuclear energy and the manufacture of nuclear weapons is no longer great. Nuclear technology is within almost everyone’s reach and is no longer a secret reserved solely for members of the nuclear club. During my work over the years as Egypt’s delegate to the IAEA, I discovered that technological applications derived from this energy are infinitely more numerous than strategic or military ones. Therefore, the Western ban on nuclear programs is nothing but a ban on progress and development, and on the opening of promising new horizons for the future in very many countries that suffer from energy shortages…”

The Purpose Of Iran’s Nuclear Program Is Military; Arab Nuclear Weapons Will Be A Nightmare For The West And Israel

“We have all followed the developments in Iran’s nuclear dossier and their transition to the stage of uranium enrichment and nuclear fuel production. I am among those who believe that Iran’s goal is first and foremost military-strategic, and it is hard to forbid Iran from pursuing it when the West has enabled the existence of a nuclear arsenal in ‘Israel.’ The Arabs cannot be like beggars at the table of nasty skinflints, besieged by two nuclear programs that constitute a deterrent, even in terms of morale, and which are like a sword held to the neck of the [Arabs’] future.”

Read The Full Report

Tweet this report | Post this report on Facebook | MEMRI Apps available for: Available on the iPhone App Store  Available on the Android App Store
Unsubscribe | Forward to a Friend | Sign Up for More | Donate | Visit Our Site
For assistance, please contact MEMRI at memri@memri.org.
P.O. Box 27837, Washington, DC 20038-7837
Phone: (202) 955-9070 | Fax: (202) 955-9077

The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) is an independent, non-profit organization that translates and analyzes the media of the Middle East. Copies of articles and documents cited, as well as background information, are available on request.

MEMRI holds copyrights on all translations. Materials may only be used with proper attribution.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

MEMRI: Hamas Leader Mahmoud Al-Zahhar Defends Relations With Iran: We Maintain Ties With Countries That Believe In Our Ideology


The Middle East Media Research Institute

MEMRI The Middle East Media Research Institute

Like Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter YouTube

Hamas Leader Mahmoud Al-Zahhar Defends Relations With Iran: We Maintain Ties With Countries That Believe In Our Ideology
In a recent TV interview, Hamas Leader Mahmoud Al-Zahhar said: “We have maintained that countries that believe in our ideology and can help us – countries like Iran that believe we are capable of liberating Palestine… These are the countries with which we must develop relations.” The interview aired on the Lebanese Palestine Today TV channel on February 18, 2015.

Click here to view this clip on MEMRI TV

4810MTV A.jpg

Mahmoud Al-Zahhar: “We did not join the PLO when it acted against Jordan in 1970, and we did not join its wars in Beirut and against Hafez Al-Assad. We did not join the PLO when it supported one Arab country that occupied another Arab country. To this day, we have never intervened in the internal Arab conflicts, even in countries where we lived, like Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, or elsewhere. We have kept our force directed at the Israeli enemy. We have maintained that countries that believe in our ideology and can help us – countries like Iran that believe we are capable of liberating Palestine… These are countries with which we must develop relations. We must take advantage of these relations in order to strike a balance with the opposing (Zionist) enterprise. Therefore, our vision has many layers. With regard to our position towards Europe, when we talk with the Europeans, the first thing we ask them is: What is the name of the land you call ‘Israel’ for thousands of years until 1948? We ask them: What is the difference between a freedom fighter and a terrorist? Who is a terrorist? What is the international definition of terrorism? We say to them that if this definition applies to us, should it not be applied to the US, to Europe, and to the Israeli entity, first and foremost? We cannot sell out our principles to Europe in exchange for (European support) for our daily livelihood.”

4810MTV B.jpg

View The Clip

Tweet this report | Post this report on Facebook | MEMRI Apps available for: Available on the iPhone App Store  Available on the Android App Store
Unsubscribe | Forward to a Friend | Sign Up for More | Donate | Visit Our Site
For assistance, please contact MEMRI at memri@memri.org.
P.O. Box 27837, Washington, DC 20038-7837
Phone: (202) 955-9070 | Fax: (202) 955-9077

The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) is an independent, non-profit organization that translates and analyzes the media of the Middle East. Copies of articles and documents cited, as well as background information, are available on request.

MEMRI holds copyrights on all translations. Materials may only be used with proper attribution.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Interesting Stats off the Vietnam Memorial Wall


Interesting Stats off the Vietnam Memorial Wall

Veterans

A Social Network for Navy Veterans of the United States of America

INTERESTING STATISTICS OFF THE VIETNAM MEMORIAL WALL

The Wall

A little history most people will never know.
Interesting Veterans Statistics off the Vietnam Memorial Wall
There are 58,267 names now listed on that polished black wall, including those added in 2010.
The names are arranged in the order in which they were taken from us by date and within each date the names are alphabetized. It is hard to believe it is 36 years since the last casualties.
The first known casualty was Richard B. Fitzgibbon, of North Weymouth,  Mass. Listed by the U.S. Department of Defense as having been killed on June 8, 1956. His name is listed on the Wall with that of his son, Marine Corps Lance Cpl. Richard B. Fitzgibbon III, who was killed on Sept. 7, 1965.
There are three sets of fathers and sons on the Wall.
39,996 on the Wall were just 22 or younger.
8,283 were just 19 years old.
The largest age group: 33,103 were 18 years old.
12 soldiers on the Wall were 17 years old.
5 soldiers on the Wall were 16 years old.
One soldier, PFC Dan Bullock was 15 years old.
997 soldiers were killed on their first day in Vietnam ..
1,448 soldiers were killed on their last day in Vietnam ..
31 sets of brothers are on the Wall.
Thirty one sets of parents lost two of their sons.
54 soldiers attended Thomas Edison High School in Philadelphia .
8 Women are on the Wall. Nursing the wounded.
244 soldiers were awarded the Medal of Honor during the Vietnam War; 153 of them are on the Wall.
Beallsville, Ohio with a population of 475 lost 6 of her sons.
West Virginia had the highest casualty rate per capita in the nation. There are 711 West Virginians on the Wall.
The Marines of Morenci – They led some of the scrappiest high school football and basketball teams that the little Arizona copper town of Morenci (pop. 5,058) had ever known and cheered. They enjoyed roaring beer busts. In quieter moments, they rode horses along the Coronado Trail, stalked deer in the Apache National Forest. And in the patriotic camaraderie typical of Morenci’s mining families, the nine graduates of Morenci High enlisted as a group in the Marine Corps. Their service began on Independence Day, 1966. Only 3 returned home.
The Buddies of Midvale – LeRoy Tafoya, Jimmy Martinez, Tom Gonzales were all boyhood friends and lived on three consecutive streets in Midvale, Utah on Fifth, Sixth and Seventh avenues. They lived only a few yards apart. They played ball at the adjacent sandlot ball field. And they all went to Vietnam. In a span of 16 dark days in late 1967, all three would be killed. LeRoy was killed on Wednesday, Nov. 22, the fourth anniversary of John F. Kennedy’s assassination. Jimmy died less than 24 hours later on Thanksgiving Day. Tom was shot dead assaulting the enemy on Dec. 7, Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day.
The most casualty deaths for a single day was January 31, 1968 ~ 245 deaths.
The most casualty deaths for a single month was May 1968 – 2,415 casualties were incurred.
For most Americans who read this they will only see the numbers that the Vietnam War created. To those of us who survived the war, and to the families of those who did not, we see the faces, we feel the pain that these numbers created. We are, until we too pass away, haunted with these numbers, because they were our friends, fathers, husbands, wives, sons and daughters. There are no noble wars, just noble warriors.
Copyright © 2015 Carl Paladino, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this from Carl Paladino.

Our mailing address is:

Carl Paladino

295 Main Street

Buffalo, NY 14203

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Lithium in American Tap Water


Uploaded on Dec 18, 2009

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXue4VOZJ_Q

Lithium in the Public Water Supply, fluoride in drinking water not enough, forced mass medication.

In this video from MY FOX HEALTH, Georgiou does not explicitly call for adding the mood stabilizing drug to the water system, as suggested by Japanese researchers, but she does not denounce the proposed practice. Instead, she says the draconian proposal is a very interesting concept.

Japanese researchers, according to Georgiou, are investigating whether trace amounts of lithium can just change the mood in a community enough in a really positive way without having the bad effects of lithium to really affect the mood and decrease the suicide rate.

Remarkably, Georgiou does not address the moral issue of forcibly drugging a population into submission, which has happend for decades through drinking water fluoridation.

Lithium in water ‘curbs suicide':
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8025454.stm

Sign up to the newsletter of this site to be updated on fluoride in your drinking water:
http://www.fluoridealert.org/

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Lithium in American water


Originally posted on a12iggymom's Blog:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DV0gTbGWSg&feature=youtu.be

Uploaded on Dec 18, 2009
Lithium in the Public Water Supply, fluoride in drinking water not enough, forced mass medication.

In this video from MY FOX HEALTH, Georgiou does not explicitly call for adding the mood stabilizing drug to the water system, as suggested by Japanese researchers, but she does not denounce the proposed practice. Instead, she says the draconian proposal is a very interesting concept.

Japanese researchers, according to Georgiou, are investigating whether trace amounts of lithium can just change the mood in a community enough in a really positive way without having the bad effects of lithium to really affect the mood and decrease the suicide rate.

Remarkably, Georgiou does not address the moral issue of forcibly drugging a population into submission, which has happend for decades through drinking water fluoridation.

Lithium in water ‘curbs suicide':
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8025454.stm

Sign up to the newsletter of this site to be…

View original 74 more words

Posted in Uncategorized

Lithium in American water


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DV0gTbGWSg&feature=youtu.be

Uploaded on Dec 18, 2009
Lithium in the Public Water Supply, fluoride in drinking water not enough, forced mass medication.

In this video from MY FOX HEALTH, Georgiou does not explicitly call for adding the mood stabilizing drug to the water system, as suggested by Japanese researchers, but she does not denounce the proposed practice. Instead, she says the draconian proposal is a very interesting concept.

Japanese researchers, according to Georgiou, are investigating whether trace amounts of lithium can just change the mood in a community enough in a really positive way without having the bad effects of lithium to really affect the mood and decrease the suicide rate.

Remarkably, Georgiou does not address the moral issue of forcibly drugging a population into submission, which has happend for decades through drinking water fluoridation.

Lithium in water ‘curbs suicide':
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8025454.stm

Sign up to the newsletter of this site to be updated on fluoride in your drinking water:
http://www.fluoridealert.org/

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Lithium in the drinking water for ‘mental health’


Lithium in the drinking water for ‘mental health’

http://www.myfoxtwincities.com/dpp/buzz/georgiou-health-december-16-2009 Dr. Georgiou: Health Care Innovations 2009
[http://youtu.be/NqRqC5Z6sGs]

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

Posted in Uncategorized

Canadians Sued The Bank Of Canada & Won. Mainstream Media & Government Blacks Out Story


Canadians Sued The Bank Of Canada & Won. Mainstream Media & Government Blacks Out Story
February 2015 by Joe Martino.

bank_of_canada

Recently, constitutional lawyer Rocco Galati won yet another round of appeals set forth by the Bank of Canada in a case involving two Canadians who filed an action in federal court to restore The Bank of Canada to its original purpose and operations. This is a very significant story but you probably haven’t heard of it. Why? The mainstream media and government have blacked out the story for reasons that appear to stem from fear of how the public will react to realizing they’ve been systematically enslaved for decades.

Significant Legal Action

The initial federal court filing took place on December 12th, 2011 by Canadian constitutional lawyer, Rocco Galati, on behalf of Canadians William Krehm, Ann Emmett, and COMER (Committee for Monetary and Economic Reform). The filing is intended to “restore the use of the Bank of Canada to its original purpose, by exercising its public statutory duty and responsibility. That purpose includes making interest free loans to the municipal/provincial/federal governments for “human capital” expenditures (education health, other social services) and / or infrastructure expenditures.”
According to WestCoastNativeNews: (Note: Website may temporarily be down)
The Plaintiffs state that since 1974 there has been a gradual but sure slide into the reality that the Bank of Canada and Canada’s monetary and financial policy are dictated by private foreign banks and financial interests contrary to the Bank of Canada Act.
The plaintiffs state that the defendants (officials) are unwittingly and/or wittingly, in varying degrees, knowledge and intent engaged in a conspiracy, along with the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), Financial Stability Forum (FSF), International Monetary Fund (IMF) to render impotent the Bank of Canada Act as well as Canadian sovereignty over financial, monetary, and socio-economic policy, and bypass the sovereign rule of Canada through its parliament by means of the banking and financial systems. http://www.pacificfreepress.com/news/1/10573-confronting-global-finance-in-canadas-courts.html

The truth is, The Bank of Canada used to issue debt free loans to the government, which meant that the nation would go into debt to private banking institutions. When that changed, private bankers/corporations essentially gained control and ownership of the country.

Media Black Out

As stated by constitutional lawyer Rocco Galati in the video below, sources have indicated to him that the government will often instruct the mainstream media, when it comes to certain stories, as to whether or not they can cover the story or how they should go about covering it. This means that government can effectively control the media and hide information from the public whenever it likes, unless it trickles through alternative news sources like what you are reading right now.

Why This Is Important

Although not the ultimate solution to the world’s challenges, this is significant because it shows how serious the public is getting about wanting to change the way our current system operates. It also indicates a clear shift in public knowledge about how our system and infrastructures work. The more the people know, the more they seem to be demanding change.
This begs the questions: why is this information being kept quiet? How has it been hidden for such a long time? Why would our governments be making decisions about things that greatly affect the average person without them having any vote, knowledge, or choice in the matter?
In my view, it goes back to the fact that there are leaders in our world, beyond government, who are systematically manipulating various systems and structures in across the globe to control the population. Once viewed as wild conspiracy theories, this understanding is becoming not only self-evident, but publicly accepted knowledge as well. This latest case helps to illustrate how these ‘elite leaders’ are intentionally making moves that are not beneficial for the people whatsoever.
The bottom line is, we are seeing a positive shift in awareness and consciousness as people begin thinking about and seeing our world differently. This is fuelling action that I believe will lead towards a freer and better world.

Latest Update

Check out the video below for the latest update on recent appeals that are now heading to the supreme court for further ruling.

Where justice is denied, where poverty is enforced, where ignorance prevails, and where any one class is made to feel that society is an organized conspiracy to oppress, rob and degrade them, neither persons nor property will be safe
2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

How Modern Americans Get Information In the 21st Century


Constitutional Sound Bites
thumbnail www­.shestokas.com – How Modern Americans Get Information In the 21st Century, we’ve become used to getting information in small doses of media sound bites, short blog posts and 140 character Tweets. Modern leaders, understanding mass media, beginning with Franklin Roosevelt, (“A date which will live in infamy…”), through Barack Obama (“I don’t want to pit Red America against Blue America…”) have turned this into an art form.

America’s Revolutionary Leaders Had a Different Medium The leaders of Revolutionary America understood the communications of their day.

After the proposed Constitution was completed on September 17, 1787 the battle for ratification began. Much of it took place in the mass media of the 18th Century: newspapers. Long essays appeared around the country.

See more at: http://www.shestokas.com/constitutional-sound-bites/#sthash.UydCZdj3.dpuf

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

TRUTH REVOLT DAILY March 3, 2015


Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

MEMRI: ISIS Member To Jordanians: We Yearn To Drink Your Blood, Cut Off Your Heads; Jordanian MP Against Anti-ISIS Coalition: U.S. Just Wants A Foothold; Iraqi Shi’ite Militia Leader: Give Me A Month, I Will Make ISIS Wear Women’s Clothing


The Middle East Media Research Institute

 
MEMRI The Middle East Media Research Institute

MEMRI Daily: March 3, 2015

 

 

MEMRI TV Clip No. 4803

ISIS Member To Jordanians: We Yearn To Drink Your Blood, Cut Off Your Heads

In a video-clip posted on the Internet on February 26, 2015, an ISIS member says to the Jordanian king and his army: “By Allah, we yearn to meet you in battle, to cut off your heads, and to disperse you.”

Following are excerpts:

Click here to view this clip on MEMRI TV

4803MTV A.JPG

ISIS member: “For how much longer will you support this tyrant, and send your sons to his army and security services? For how long will your sons continue to be cannon fodder in battles which you have nothing to do with? The war is between Crusader America and us, so why are you sending your sons to the front line of this Crusader campaign?”

View The Clip

 

MEMRI TV Clip No. 4804

Jordanian MP Hind Al-Fayez Against Anti-ISIS Coalition: The U.S. Just Wants A Foothold

In a Mayadeen TV interview, Jordanian MP Hind Al-Fayez said: “I want to uproot these terrorist organizations, but not under American auspices.” The Americans, Al-Fayez said, were “trying to shatter the Arab countries into mini-states.” The interview aired on February 11, 2015.

Click here to view this clip on MEMRI TV

4804MTV A.JPG

View The Clip

 

MEMRI TV Clip No. 4808

Iraqi Shi’ite Militia Leader Watheq Al-Battat: Give Me A Month, And I Will Make ISIS Terrorists Wear Women’s Clothing

In an Iraqi TV interview, Watheq Al-Battat, leader of the Iraqi “Al-Mukhtar Army” Shi’ite militia, said: “Give us the chance, and we will destroy them… I will make them rue the day they ever called themselves ISIS. By Hussein, I will make them wear their women’s clothing.” The interview aired on Hona Baghdad TV on February 13, 2015.

Following are excerpts:

Click here to view this clip on MEMRI TV

4808MTV A.jpg

Interviewer: “What was the message that you delivered to Al-Maliki [when he was still prime minister]?”

Watheq Al-Battat: “The message was that he needed to prepare for a confrontation with ISIS, because ISIS would enter the country within a year or a year and a half. That was the message I conveyed to him. The entire Iraqi people understood this, except the prime minister.

[…]

“ISIS is the enemy, and if it beats us, it can do whatever it likes with us…but as the saying goes: ‘If you want to build a state, you must load ten bullets in your gun – nine for your friends and one for your foe.'” 

View The Clip

 

MEMRI TV Clip No. 4789

Syrian Commentator Taleb Ibrahim: If We Had Nuclear Bombs, We Would Drop Them On The Terrorists

In a recent TV interview, Syrian commentator Taleb Ibrahim, who frequently represents the Syrian regime in the media, said: “If only the regime had a nuclear weapon which it could use and rid us of these…” He further said of the proposed six-week ceasefire in Aleppo brokered by U.N. envoy Staffan de Mistura: “This is not a truce. This is a prelude to the unconditional surrender [of the terrorists].” The interview aired on February 18, 2015 on the new Qatari Al-Araby TV channel, broadcasting from London.

Following are excerpts:

Click here to view this clip on MEMRI TV

4789MTV A.jpg

Interviewer: “Why does the Syrian regime offer, through de Mistura, only 6 weeks of [ceasefire in Aleppo]?”

Taleb Ibrahim: “This is not the issue. Six weeks is only a test period. So that Mr. de Mistura can start negotiating with the leaders of the armed groups in Aleppo, in an attempt to reach a final settlement. We will not sign a full ceasefire, so long as the armed groups keep their weapons, and continue to control various areas…”

View The Clip

Tweet this report | Post this report on Facebook | MEMRI Apps available for: Available on the iPhone App Store  Available on the Android App Store
 Forward to a Friend | Sign Up for More | Donate | Visit Our Site
For assistance, please contact MEMRI at memri@memri.org.
P.O. Box 27837, Washington, DC 20038-7837
Phone: (202) 955-9070 | Fax: (202) 955-9077The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) is an independent, non-profit organization that translates and analyzes the media of the Middle East. Copies of articles and documents cited, as well as background information, are available on request.

MEMRI holds copyrights on all translations. Materials may only be used with proper attribution.

 

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.” 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

THINGS I TRUST MORE THAN BARACK OBAMA


Originally posted on tomfernandez28's Blog:

Screen Shot 2015-02-18 at 3.40.58 PM

View original

Posted in Uncategorized

If Not Now … When? Will the GOP Majority Ever Stand for Anything?


It is never the right time to do the right thing in Washington, D.C.

The phrase I heard most often from Republican leadership while serving in the House and Senate was, “This is not the right time to have this fight.”

Whether the issue was balancing the budget, school choice, patient-driven healthcare, eliminating earmarks, raising the debt limit, ending big, crony handouts like the Export-Import Bank or any stand against the continued growth, favoritism and intrusion of big government, conservatives were always told to wait. Wait until conservatives have the majority. Wait until we have the White House. Wait until we are reelected.

We’re seeing that “wait” attitude in practice today as the House votes on a “clean” Department of Homeland Security funding bill. Despite the fact that Republicans have majorities in both the House and the Senate that were elected on a pledge to fight against President Obama’s executive amnesty, and despite forcing through a big spending bill at the end of 2014 with the promise they would fight later on Homeland Security appropriations, they are now punting the issue entirely.

READ MORE: http://dailysignal.com/2015/03/03/not-now-will-gop-majority-ever-stand-anything/

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

The Official White House Terror Identification Chart


2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

Image | Posted on by

Obama ~ I am not….I am….


 

iam

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

Image | Posted on by | 4 Comments

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Address to Joint Meeting of Congress


http://www.c-span.org/video/?324609-2/israeli-prime-minister-benjamin-netanyahu-address-congress

 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Address to Joint Meeting of Congress

Video | Posted on by

12 year old makes “Obama doesn’t love America” video, then this happens to his Facebook page


The 12 year old boy (more of a man than Obama will ever be though) who made an incredibly viral video about how Obama doesn’t love America is learning first hand how conservatives are silenced in the media
Screen Shot 2015-02-23 at 9.14.59 AM.png
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUtirCf-RfU

The video has amassed 1.2 million views in 9 days.

See Video and Read more at http://www.youngcons.com/12-year-old-makes-obama-doesnt-love-america-video-happens-facebook-page/#Fm5FoZt9XKlfPwRO.99

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

The Benghazi Cover Up a CFR MSM/CIA Covert Op Hiding CFR Sponsorship Of A Psycho Political Operation Gone Bad


On March 15, 2013 the New York times published an article titled Worldly at 35, and Shaping Obama’s Voice. The article is about Benjamin J. Rhodes, President Obama’s deputy national security advisor. Missing from the article are Rhodes’ Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) membership connections.

Prior to joining Obama, Rhodes worked for five years as Special Assistant to CFR member Lee Hamilton. At the time former Indiana congressman was Director of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C. In 2004 Rhodes help draft recommendations of the 9/11 Commission. CFR member Hamilton was Vice Chairman of the Commission. In 2006 Rhodes drafted the report of the Iraq Study Group. Seven of the ten Iraq Study Group members belonged to the Council on Foreign Relations. The Iraq Study group members were :

READ MORE: https://tomjefferson1976.wordpress.com/2014/05/03/the-benghazi-cover-up-a-cfr-msmcia-covert-op-hiding-cfr-sponsorship-of-a-psycho-political-operation-gone-gone-bad/

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

FCC, You can NOT see the 332 pages of regulations on the internet


B_EAstGW8AIdq8W.jpg

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

DHS: THE PEOPLE ARE “THE ENEMY”


B_JP3UyXEAADoiX.jpg

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Trying to Avert War – Netanyahu, Churchill and Congress…There are striking similarities between the objectives of Churchill’s speech nearly 75 years ago


…There are striking similarities between the objectives of Churchill’s speech nearly 75 years ago and Netanyahu’s today; both with no less purpose than to avert global conflagration. And, like Churchill’s in the 1930s, Netanyahu’s is the lone voice among world leaders today. There is no doubt abut Iran’s intent. It has been described as a nuclear Auschwitz. Israel is not the only target of Iranian violence. Iran has long been making good on its promises to mobilize Islamic forces against the US, as well as the UK and other American allies. Attacks directed and supported by Iran have killed an estimated 1,100 American troops in Iraq in recent years. Iran provided direct support to Al Qaeda in the 9/11 attacks….It is not yet too late to prevent Iran from arming itself with nuclear weapons. In his 1941 speech to Congress, Churchill reminded the American people that five or six years previously it would have been easy to prevent Germany from rearming without bloodshed. But by then it was too late.

Trying%2Bto%2BAvert%2BWar%2B-%2BNetanyahu%2C%2BChurchill%2Band%2BCongress.jpg
Richard Kemp..
Gatestone Institute..
01 March ’15..

In a few days, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will address the US Congress for the third time. The only other foreign leader to have had that privilege was Winston Churchill. Like Churchill when he first spoke to Congress in December 1941, Netanyahu is taking a risk.

For Churchill the risk was to his life — he had to make a hazardous transatlantic voyage aboard the battleship HMS Duke of York through stormy, U-boat infested waters. For Netanyahu the risk is to his own political life and to his country’s relationship with the United States, given the intense presidential opposition to his speech.

But like Churchill was, Netanyahu is a fighting soldier and, like Churchill, a tough political leader, unafraid to shoulder such risks when so much is at stake. And in both cases, the stakes could not be higher, greater than their own lives, political fortunes or rivalries and affecting not just their own countries and the United States, but the whole of the world.

There are striking similarities between the objectives of Churchill’s speech nearly 75 years ago and Netanyahu’s today: both with no less a purpose than to avert global conflagration.

Speaking days after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Churchill summarized the course of the war thus far but then concluded with a dramatic appeal to the American people for Anglo-American unity to prevent conflict in the future, reminding them that “twice in a single generation, the catastrophe of world war has fallen upon us.”

“Do we not owe it to ourselves, to our children, and to mankind,” he asked, “to make sure that these catastrophes do not engulf us for the third time?”

No less profound, and no less far-reaching, will be Netanyahu’s appeal for American-Israeli unity in the face of a new danger. A danger perhaps even greater than Churchill was able to comprehend in pre-nuclear 1941. Whereas Churchill spoke of a future, as yet unknown peril, Netanyahu will focus on the clear and present threat to world peace if Iran is allowed to produce nuclear weapons.

And like Churchill in the 1930s, Netanyahu’s is a lone voice among world leaders today.

In pursuit of both uranium and plutonium tracks to a bomb, as well as the development of long-range ballistic missiles, there is no doubt about Iran’s intent. It has been described as a nuclear Auschwitz.

It is Netanyahu’s duty to sound the alarm against such a prospect. It is Israel’s survival that is at stake. It is Israel that will have to conduct military intervention if the US will not. And it is Israelis who will die in any subsequent regional conflagration.

But this is not only an existential threat to Israel — it is a danger to other states in the Middle East and to us all. Doubtful of Western resolve, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Turkey are already investigating the development of their own nuclear capabilities.

An agreement that leaves Iran with the potential to achieve nuclear breakout will trigger a Middle East arms race that will exponentially increase the risks of global nuclear war, a risk multiplied by the vulnerability of regional governments to overthrow by extremists.

Iran’s ballistic missile program, inexplicably outside the scope of current P5+1 negotiations, brings Europe into Iran’s range, and future development will extend Tehran’s nuclear reach to the US. The world’s number one sponsor of terrorism, the regime of the ayatollahs would have no qualms about supplying their terrorist proxies with nuclear weapons.

This is the greatest threat the world faces today. Yet all the signals suggest that the P5+1, driven by President Obama’s apparent desperation for détente with Tehran, is already set on a path towards 1930s-style appeasement that will end with Iran’s acquisition of nuclear weapons.

The view that Cold War style containment and mutual deterrence could prevent this apocalyptic, fanatical regime from using its nuclear weapons is dangerously naïve. Yet the Western leaders who seem to be on the verge of reaching an agreement are not naïve. Lacking the moral strength to face down Iran, they see deception and appeasement as the only way out of their dilemma.

To gauge their intentions, we do not need to rely just on frequent Iranian threats, such as those of General Hossein Salami, who said recently, with negotiations still under way: “As long as the US continue to use the Islamic world as the scene for their regional policies, all the forces of the Islamic world will undoubtedly be mobilized against them.” In the same interview, he threatened Israel too: “The very existence of the Zionist entity and its collapse are of crucial importance.”

Iran’s determination to bring about the violent collapse of the “Zionist entity” is continuously manifested in its directing and funding of armed attacks against Israeli soldiers and civilians at home and overseas, by proxies including Hizballah, Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. The Gaza conflict last summer, for example, owed much to Iranian funding and weaponry.

Just a few weeks ago, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps General Mohammad Allahadi was operating with senior Hizballah commanders to set up a new front on Syrian territory in the Golan, from which to launch attacks against Israel. He was killed by an Israeli air strike while visiting his planned area of operations.

Israel is not the only target of Iranian violence. Iran has long been making good on its promises to mobilize Islamic forces against the US, as well as the UK and other American allies. Attacks directed and supplied from Tehran killed an estimated 1,100 American troops in Iraq in recent years. Strikes have been facilitated in Afghanistan, killing US, British and other Coalition soldiers.

Iran provided direct support to Al Qaeda in the 9/11 attacks and continues to harbor Al Qaeda terrorists. Between 2010 and 2013, Tehran either ordered or allowed at least three major terrorist plots against the US and Europe to be planned from its soil. Fortunately, all were foiled. Direction, support and facilitation to both Sunni and Shia terrorist groups in planning attacks against the US and its allies continues today.

This vengeful and volatile regime must not in any circumstances be allowed to gain a nuclear weapons capability, whatever the P5+1 states might consider the short-term economic, political or strategic benefits to themselves of a deal with Tehran.

Even before the world’s first experience of nuclear bombing in August 1945, Churchill and Roosevelt both understood the dangers of allowing their enemies and potential enemies to acquire such capability. When Allied intelligence identified a Nazi uranium production plant in Oranienburg in eastern Germany, 612 bombers destroyed it in a single raid in March 1945 with 1,506 tons of high explosives and 178 tons of incendiary bombs, to prevent it falling into the hands of advancing Russian troops.

Only a strong stand by the West, and rejection of an agreement that allows development of nuclear weapons, will ensure that such action does not in the future become necessary against Iran. In his 1941 speech to Congress, Churchill reminded the American people that five or six years previously it would have been easy to prevent Germany from rearming without bloodshed. But by then it was too late, and the world was engulfed in unprecedented violence.

It is not yet too late to prevent Iran from arming itself with nuclear weapons. The American people, the American government and the West as a whole must heed Netanyahu’s clear warning not to reach a deal that will allow the mendacious and malevolent Iranian regime to acquire nuclear weapons. Instead, sanctions that stand a chance of compelling Tehran to abandon its world-threatening ambitions must be maintained, and if necessary, increased.

Link:

Colonel Richard Kemp spent most his 30-year career in the British Army commanding front-line troops in fighting terrorism and insurgency in hotspots including Iraq, the Balkans, South Asia and Northern Ireland. He was Commander of British Forces in Afghanistan in 2003. From 2002 – 2006 he heading the international terrorism team at the Joint Intelligence Committee of the British Prime Minister’s Office.

Updates throughout the day at http://calevbenyefuneh.blogspot.com. If you enjoy “Love of the Land“, please be a subscriber. Just put your email address in the “Subscribe” box on the upper right-hand corner of the page.Twitter updates at LoveoftheLand as well as our Love of the Land page at Facebook which has additional pieces of interest besides that which is posted on the blog. Also check-out This Ongoing War by Frimet and Arnold Roth. An excellent blog, very important work as well as a big vote to follow our good friend Kay Wilson on Twitter,

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment