Salon Shocker: ‘The Left Has Islam All Wrong’


Steven Crowder: Of COURSE We Should Draw Muhammad

5.10.2015
News
Caleb Howe

SNL: Game Show Contestants Balk at Drawing Muhammad

5.10.2015
News
Mark Tapson

BREAKING: Two Police Officers Shot And Killed In Mississippi, Manhunt Underway

5.9.2015
News
Caleb Howe

Salon Shocker: ‘The Left Has Islam All Wrong’

5.10.2015
News
Mark Tapson

Obama’s ‘Avian Genocide’

5.10.2015
News
Mark Tapson

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Former NYPD Commish Blames Eric Holder for ‘War on Police’


Moderate Mainstream Muslim Newspaper Publisher Says Pamela Geller Is ‘Worse Than ISIS’

5.11.2015
News
Caleb Howe

Former Democratic Aide Avoids Jail Time for Rapes

5.10.2015
News
Mark Tapson

Bobby Jindal: Hillary Might Support “Re-Education Camps”

5.11.2015
News
Sara Dogan

Boston U Prof: ‘White Masculinity is THE Problem for America’s Colleges’

5.11.2015
News
Bradford Thomas

Halperin Interrogates Ted Cruz About His Cuban Heritage

5.11.2015
News
Sara Dogan

Michelle Unloads on Struggles of Being Black in America

5.11.2015
News
Bradford Thomas

Letterman: Kimmel, Fallon Viral Vids Drove Me Off TV

5.11.2015
News
Sarah Fisher

Turning Point USA Mobilizing Young Conservatives

5.11.2015
News
Bradford Thomas

Former NYPD Commish Blames Eric Holder for ‘War on Police’

5.11.2015
News
Sarah Fisher

Investigative Journalist Shreds Official WH Story on Bin Laden Raid

5.11.2015
News
Trey Sanchez

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Allen West “We Have Played Games of Political Correctness With Jihadists” And Not Spotlighting THIS


Featured Story

11256451_10204294890637279_1414872585_n
Allen West “We Have Played Games of Political Correctness With Jihadists” And Not Spotlighting THIS
Read this article…

Top Stories

Is A Lone Wolf terrorist attack underway? Allen West Had THIS To Say!

Read this article …

DHS Confirms: IBM Sale Has Created SERIOUS Security Issue For US Navy

Read this article …

ISIS threatens America with cyber attack today

Read this article …

FCC Rejects Petition To Delay Net Neutrality And That’s Not All!

Read this article …

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

EXCLUSIVE: ‘Draw Muhammad’ Contest Winner Defends Event


EXCLUSIVE: ‘Draw Muhammad’ Contest Winner Defends Event

5.8.2015
News
Bradford Thomas

Tim Tebow Opens Hospital In Country Where Mother Refused Abortion

5.7.2015
News
Paul Bois

MSNBC’s Chris Hayes Nails It On Freedom of Speech And Drawing Muhammad

5.7.2015
News
Caleb Howe

Hillary Has Only Taken 8 Questions from Media Since Announcing

5.8.2015
News
Bradford Thomas

Hillary Raises $3M in One-Day Visit to Los Angeles

5.8.2015
News
Sarah Fisher

FBI Director: ‘Maybe Thousands’ Recruited by ISIS in US

5.8.2015
News
Bradford Thomas

BBQ Restaurant to Hold ‘White Appreciation Day’

5.8.2015
News
Sarah Fisher

Lynch to Investigate Constitutional Violations of Baltimore PD

5.8.2015
News
Trey Sanchez

Williams: Geller Like a Pyromaniac

5.8.2015
News
Brian Lilley

Bill O’Reilly on Garland: ‘Jesus Would Not Have Sponsored That Event’

5.8.2015
News
Sara Dogan

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Gohmert Talks to Beck on Elections, Terrorism & Religious Freedom


Rep. Louie Gohmert (TX-01) talked to Glenn Beck in studio about terrorism in the United States and abroad. He also weighed in on religious freedom and Hillary Clinton.

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Angry White Bag-gage


http://comicallyincorrect.com/2015/05/07/angry-white-men/

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Imam Anjem Choudary Tells Hannity That Pamela Geller Should Die


Marc Lamont Hill: Islam Doesn’t Get Special Treatment

5.7.2015
News
Brian Lilley

FBI Gave Police Three Hour Warning Before Garland Attack

5.7.2015
News
Trey Sanchez

Michael Brown Friend Dorian Johnson Arrested

5.7.2015
News
Sarah Fisher

FBI, Homeland Security Not Protecting Pamela Geller Against Fatwa

5.7.2015
News
Trey Sanchez

Imam Anjem Choudary Tells Hannity That Pamela Geller Should Die

5.7.2015
News
Caleb Howe

COULTER: Smart Policing: Lock Up Liberals

5.6.2015
Commentary
Ann Coulter

CVS to Rebuild Burned-Down, Looted Baltimore Stores

5.7.2015
News
Sarah Fisher

Feminists Accuse University of Failing to Respond to Cyber Threats

5.7.2015
News
Bradford Thomas

Rick Santorum to Announce Presidential Run May 27

5.7.2015
News
Sarah Fisher

Michelle Obama: Minorities Don’t Feel Welcome in Museums

5.7.2015
News
Sara Dogan

Natalie Portman: I Don’t Want to Use My Platform to ‘Sh*t on Israel,’ But…

5.7.2015
News
Bradford Thomas

The Press Love Freedom of Speech, Right?

5.7.2015
News
Caleb Howe

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

JADE HELM 15 is REAL & Here’s the Proof


The news of JADE HELM 15 has caught the internet on fire. Now, coming out of the woodwork are the nay sayers, propagandists, and straight out liars. Yes, I am calling them exactly what they are, liars. Political Correctness stops here. The truth may hurt, but it is the truth. If you don’t like that, then either go to a different site or change your behavior.

There have been individuals from “trolls” to others that “claim” they are ex-Special Operations Command stating “this is not a real drill,” Or that “the documents have been modified.” These statements are not true, and are only being used in another “PSYOP” upon the American People. I will prove to you beyond the shadow of a doubt this operation is, in fact, true, and call these people out for what they are, liars! Anyone who tells you this is not a planned drill is lying to you either blatantly or by complete ignorance, neither of which is acceptable.

JADE HELM 15 is a (SOC) Special Operations Command (RMT) Realistic Military Training planned drill for the South Western United States covering seven states which broke in alternative media almost a week ago. Freedom Outpost’s Joe McMaster covered this on March 20, 2015. I will not sit idly by and allow our alternative media to be portrayed as “conspiracy theorists” by those that are ignorant or liars. I stand in defense of all the alternative media that have reported and helped to expose this very real “exercise/drill,” JADE HELM 15, to the American Public. I challenge the propagandists, liars, and PSYOP’s to debunk this! You have been caught with your pants down and now you are trying to do “damage control.” It’s not going to work.

On OFFICIAL: February 10, 2015 the Brazos County Commissioners Court held a meeting about “JADE HELM 15″. Ref: #4

OFFICIAL: Thomas Mead the JADE HELM Operations Planner/MSEL addressing Brazos County Commissioners on February 10, 2015. Including them planning “surgical strikes”, while the county commissioner makes a joke of it.

Listen below:

Audio Player And Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/03/jade-helm-15-is-real-heres-the-proof/#Jqiu4i5tJZULzTzr.99

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

The Obama Double Standard on Civilian Casualties


The Obama Double Standard on Civilian Casualties

Posted: 06 May 2015 11:57 AM PDT

…I don’t expect anything of people who think U.S. drone strikes are no less evil than Israel’s actions in Gaza. But the Obama Administration routinely defends its own civilian casualties as honest mistakes that occurred despite the strictest precautions. And to do that while simultaneously insisting that Israel’s can’t possibly be the same is the height of hypocrisy.

The%2BObama%2BDouble%2BStandard%2Bon%2BCivilian%2BCasualties.JPG
Evelyn Gordon..
Commentary Magazine..
06 May ’15..

I know it’s been a busy two weeks, but I’m still waiting for that apology. I’ve been waiting for it ever since the U.S. admitted on April 23 to accidentally killing two Western hostages in Pakistan, and doubly so after a U.S. airstrike allegedly killed 52 civilians in Syria last Friday. Clearly, I don’t expect an apology for the fact that American forces are composed of men rather than angels, and therefore sometimes makes mistakes. But I certainly do expect an apology for the Obama Administration’s refusal to acknowledge that so are Israel’s forces. In the administration’s view, Israel never makes honest mistakes. If Israel inadvertently kills civilians in wartime, then it wasn’t trying hard enough not to do so.

We don’t yet know what happened in Syria, but the drone strike on an al-Qaeda compound in Pakistan is instructive. Administration officials told the New York Times that the CIA had “no idea that the hostages were being held there despite hundreds of hours of surveillance.” Yet they apparently can’t conceive of Israel — in the midst of a shooting war where decisions on whether to return fire must be made instantly, rather than with the benefit of hundreds of hours of surveillance — being similarly unaware that civilians were present at various sites it targeted during last summer’s war with Hamas in Gaza.

Needless to say, American military professionals don’t share the administration’s view. The day after the White House announced the hostages’ deaths; Michael Schmitt and John Merriam published a summary of their detailed investigation into Israel’s targeting practices during that war. Schmitt, a professor of international law, heads the Stockton Center for the Study of International Law at the U.S. Naval War College and is considered a leading expert on the laws of armed conflict (LOAC). Merriam is a U.S. Army Judge Advocate and associate director of the Stockton Center. They were given unusual access to information, like targeting procedures that the Israel Defense Forces usually keeps secret; they were also allowed to observe IDF targeting cells at work and examine combat footage that hasn’t been publicly released. And here’s their conclusion:

Broadly speaking, we concluded that IDF positions on targeting law largely track those of the United States military. Moreover, even when they differ, the Israeli approach remains within the ambit of generally acceptable State practice … we found that their approach to targeting is consistent with the law and, in many cases, worthy of emulation.

They also pointed out that “the nuances of the Israeli approach … can only be understood in the context of the specific operational and strategic environment in which the IDF must fight.” And the complexities of that environment, which Israel’s critics largely ignore, go beyond such simple facts as Hamas’s penchant for launching rockets from civilian homes.

For instance, one key principle of LOAC is proportionality, meaning that an attack is illegal if the anticipated harm to civilians is disproportionate to the anticipated military benefit. But for a country that routinely trades hundreds of terrorists – who then resume killing Israelis – for a single captured soldier, the anticipated military benefit of preventing a soldier from being captured may be much higher than it would be for countries that don’t routinely make such trades, Schmitt and Merriam noted.

Yet the professionals’ view – also voiced by Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey last November – never mattered to their civilian superiors. Even a Pentagon spokesman joined the administration pile-on accusing Israel of callous disregard for civilian life, declaring in a news briefing last July that “the Israelis need to do more to live up to their very high standards … for protecting civilian life.”

I don’t expect anything of people who think U.S. drone strikes are no less evil than Israel’s actions in Gaza. But the Obama Administration routinely defends its own civilian casualties as honest mistakes that occurred despite the strictest precautions. And to do that while simultaneously insisting that Israel’s can’t possibly be the same is the height of hypocrisy.

Link: https://www.commentarymagazine.com/2015/05/06/obamas-double-standard-on-civilian-casualties-gaza-drones/

.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Allen West: UNCONSCIONABLE! Radical Imam Tells Pam Geller She Should Be Slaughtered (VIDEO)


Featured Story

Iman
VIDEO: Radical Imam Anjem Choudary Tells Pam Geller She Should Be Slaughtered
Read this article…

Top Stories

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

FDR Repudiated the Welfare State: ‘a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit’


a12iggymom:

Amazing quote….I would not believe it dripped from his lips.

Originally posted on Enjoyment and Contemplation:

FDRI had no idea that FDR had ever said anything like this.  He sounds like Mark Steyn himself, who first persuaded me that forced redistribution is not only bad for the “makers”, but also for the “takers”—that is, the welfare state is not only bad economics, but more importantly, it also tends to infantilize its recipients; it is corrosive of the very human spirit.

Don’t take my word for it; read FDR’s words for yourself.  Here they are, in context:

View original 1,133 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Truth Report: Predictable: ‘Draw Muhammad’ Organizers Blamed for Attack


Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

This is what the media won’t show you: the winning cartoon:


Watch VIDEO: Winning Muhammad Cartoonist Bosch Fawstin Acceptance Speech and the Winning Cartoon – See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2015/05/bosch-fawstin-speech.html/#sthash.L11pigZq.dpuf

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might .11 Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. 13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. 14 Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; 15 And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; 16 Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. 17 And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God: 18 Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints; but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

James Rosen: The Pentagon has a message for Texas #JadeHelm15


Jade Helm 15

Published on May 5th, 2015 | by Allen West Republic

SHARE ON FACEBOOK
SHARE ON TWITTER

McClatchyDC by James Rosen:

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon has a message for Texas: chill.

Defense officials Monday dismissed as “wild speculation” an Internet-fueled claim that a massive summertime exercise called Jade Helm 15 for special operations commandos is a covert operation by President Barack Obama to take over Texas.

That claim was given legitimacy by Texas Gov. Gregg Abbott’s order last week for the Texas State Guard to monitor the exercises.

“Operation Jade Helm poses no threat to any American’s civil liberties,” Army Col. Steve Warren, a Pentagon spokesman, said Monday. “Operation Jade Helm is being conducted by Americans – by, specifically, American special forces personnel.”

Jade Helm 15 will be one of the biggest peacetime military exercises in six decades. Starting July 15 and lasting two months, thousands of Army Rangers, Green Berets, Navy SEALS and other special operations forces will simulate war missions in mainly remote areas of Arizona, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, Texas and Utah.

Jade Helm 15 will take place on tracts of both public and private land in the seven states.

CONTINUE READING ALL THE DETAILS HERE:
WASHINGTON: Pentagon: Texas has nothing to fear from upcoming military exercise | National Security & Defense | McClatchy DC

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might .11 Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. 13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. 14 Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; 15 And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; 16 Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. 17 And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God: 18 Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints; but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Harm On The Home Front – 13WHAM ABC Rochester NY – Featured


Shame on the VA and this administration for further harming our military and the veterans!!!

Updated: Tuesday, May 5 2015, 12:46 AM EDT

b2zZ44ndUPQt49nV_22350video: http://13wham.com/news/features/featured/stories/harm-home-front-5651.shtml

Rochester, N.Y. – David Goodsell dreams of being able to work fulltime. “I feel depressed sometimes because I want to go back to work fulltime,” said Goodsell in his Gates living room. “I’ve thought about and I’ve even made inquiries once or twice in the last year and then more so since they knocked me down. I mean right now I’m getting $500 from the VA when I was getting $1200 and that helped quite a bit.” Goodsell was a Corporal in the United States Army in 1983 when he injured his back during a training exercise in Germany before the first Gulf War. He’s had three back surgeries since, in 1986, 1991 and 1998. According to the V.A. Goodsell is 40-percent disabled. “Effective November 1st they knocked me back to 40-percent, from 60 to 40,” he explained and he shared the letter he received that goes on to say: “The most recent examination dated May 1, 2014 shows improvement in active range of motion testing which would warrant only a 20 percent evaluation. As you have been service connected at the 40 percent rate for more than 20 years this evaluation is protected by the law and cannot be reduced.” Goodsell believes a physical done at the V.A. on Westfall Road in Rochester caused this.

Read More at: http://13wham.com/news/features/featured/stories/harm-home-front-5651.shtml

Updated: Tuesday, May 5 2015, 12:46 AM EDT Rochester, N.Y. – David Goodsell dreams of being able to work fulltime. “I feel depressed sometimes because I want to go back to work fulltime,” said Goodsell in his Gates living room. “I’ve thought about and I’ve even made inquiries once or twice in the last year and then more so since they knocked me down. I mean right now I’m getting $500 from the VA when I was getting $1200 and that helped quite a bit.” Goodsell was a Corporal in the United States Army in 1983 when he injured his back during a training exercise in Germany before the first Gulf War. He’s had three back surgeries since, in 1986, 1991 and 1998. According to the V.A. Goodsell is 40-percent disabled. “Effective November 1st they knocked me back to 40-percent, from 60 to 40,” he explained and he shared the letter he received that goes on to say: “The most recent examination dated May 1, 2014 shows improvement in active range of motion testing which would warrant only a 20 percent evaluation. As you have been service connected at the 40 percent rate for more than 20 years this evaluation is protected by the law and cannot be reduced.” Goodsell believes a physical done at the V.A. on Westfall Road in Rochester caused this.

Read More at: http://13wham.com/news/features/featured/stories/harm-home-front-5651.shtml

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Mom has son arrested to scare him – 13WHAM ABC Rochester NY – Top Stories


Originally posted on a12iggymom's Blog:

(ABC News) – When a mother in Columbus, Georgia, learned her 10-year-old son Sean was misbehaving in class, she said she looked to the local police to help. Chiquita Hill said her son Sean’s fifth-grade teacher told her that Sean was “rude and disrespectful, not listening, talking back, not doing his school work.” On Tuesday, the teacher even came to Hill’s house to speak with Sean. But her words went “in one ear and out the other,” Hill said. “I knew I had to do something to shock him,” Hill, 33, told ABC News today.

Read More at: http://13wham.com/news/features/top-stories/stories/mom-has-son-arrested-scare-him-22498.shtml

God bless this Mom and these officers!!

MOMSONARRESTED_22498
(ABC News) – When a mother in Columbus, Georgia, learned her 10-year-old son Sean was misbehaving in class, she said she looked to the local police to help. Chiquita Hill said her son Sean’s fifth-grade teacher told her that Sean was “rude and disrespectful…

View original 55 more words

Posted in Uncategorized

Mom has son arrested to scare him – 13WHAM ABC Rochester NY – Top Stories


(ABC News) – When a mother in Columbus, Georgia, learned her 10-year-old son Sean was misbehaving in class, she said she looked to the local police to help. Chiquita Hill said her son Sean’s fifth-grade teacher told her that Sean was “rude and disrespectful, not listening, talking back, not doing his school work.” On Tuesday, the teacher even came to Hill’s house to speak with Sean. But her words went “in one ear and out the other,” Hill said. “I knew I had to do something to shock him,” Hill, 33, told ABC News today.

Read More at: http://13wham.com/news/features/top-stories/stories/mom-has-son-arrested-scare-him-22498.shtml

God bless this Mom and these officers!!

MOMSONARRESTED_22498
(ABC News) – When a mother in Columbus, Georgia, learned her 10-year-old son Sean was misbehaving in class, she said she looked to the local police to help. Chiquita Hill said her son Sean’s fifth-grade teacher told her that Sean was “rude and disrespectful, not listening, talking back, not doing his school work.” On Tuesday, the teacher even came to Hill’s house to speak with Sean. But her words went “in one ear and out the other,” Hill said. “I knew I had to do something to shock him,” Hill, 33, told ABC News today.

Read More at: http://13wham.com/news/features/top-stories/stories/mom-has-son-arrested-scare-him-22498.shtml

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

I am a __________ because, … awesome show clip


Hey guys!

Heard audio from a YouTube clip last night on the Exceptional Conservative Show that I felt deserved a response.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10721419/imalibcon.mp3 6 minutes

Please feel free to use or discard it as you wish–but I hope you’ll at least give it a listen. :D

Have a great one everybody!

Thank you, great show Aggedor!!

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”
10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might .11 Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. 13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. 14 Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; 15 And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; 16 Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. 17 And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God: 18 Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints; but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Brutal Honesty: This Is The Video About Racism They Don’t Want You To See


May 2, 2015 by Mac Slavo

Al-Sharpton-and-ObamaThough Americans were under the impression that race would improve after the election of a half-black man as President of the United States, the last eight years have witnessed a firestorm of assumptions, accusations, lies, division and violence.
Racism, it seems, is not only alive and well, but worse than it has ever been.
Or is it? Could it be that most Americans, regardless of the color of their skin, are perfectly fine having people of other races as their friends, neighbors and colleagues, and that certain people in positions of power are using their influence to manipulate the masses?
This short micro-documentary from Future Money Trends explores a hot button issue and one that is all too often voluntarily ignored by the broader media because it is simply too controversial to admit.
Watch: Real Racism Is Supported By Lies
MORE WITH VIDEO: http://www.dcclothesline.com/2015/05/02/brutal-honesty-this-is-the-video-about-racism-they-dont-want-you-to-see/

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”
10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might .11 Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. 13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. 14 Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; 15 And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; 16 Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. 17 And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God: 18 Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints; but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

The UNCONSTITUTIONAL SAFE Act: Missing The Mark?


text size SAFE Act: Missing The Mark?

Updated: Thursday, April 30 2015, 11:29 PM EDT

East Rochester, N.Y. – After the New York SAFE Act took effect on April 15, 2013, gun shops across state stopped selling gun magazines that hold more than ten rounds.

Beikirch’s in East Rochester cleared its shelves of these high-capacity magazines.

But at Beikirch’s Pennsylvania store, high-capacity magazines are both sold and bought.

Beikirch’s owner, Hans Farnung, says he does have New Yorkers come in looking to unload their now-illegal magazines.

“We see quite a bit on the rifle end…not as much on the handgun end,” Farnung said.

Selling high-capacity magazines out of state is one way people can comply with the SAFE Act, but when we checked with several Pennsylvania gun shops, all of them told 13WHAM the number of New Yorkers looking to sell is noticeably low.

“I think they’re putting them away and hoping the Safe Act will be overturned and things will go back the way it was,” Farnung said.

Another option for gun owners is to turn the magazines over to police.

Law enforcement agencies 13WHAM spoke with say that is not happening.

“My guess is there are probably a ton of magazines out there that would be considered non-compliant in New York State,” said Chemung County Sheriff Christopher Moss.

Proving that is nearly impossible because people could be selling their magazines online to people in other states.

They could also be modifying them, which is an option provided in the Safe Act.

“It should be a permanent fix to the magazine,” Moss said. “But I haven’t seen any permanently-modified magazines by Chemung County residents.”

Former State Senator Ted O’Brien, a Democrat, voted for the Safe Act.

He reacted to the possibility many New Yorkers who own high-capacity magazines are not listening to the law.

“My friends who are gun owners in almost every instance don’t have high-capacity magazines, but to the extent that people do have them if they’re not turning them, I think that’s a problem,” O’Brien said.

The New York State Police provided this statement:

“When SAFE Act was enacted, there were a number of ways that gun owners could lawfully dispose of these magazines including being sold out of state, sold online, modified, or destroyed. Keeping a high capacity magazine is a crime and the vast majority of gun owners are responsible and would not want to do anything to jeopardize their ability to own a gun.”

If caught with a high-capacity magazine, New Yorkers have 30 days to get rid of it or permanently modify it without consequence.

If they do neither, they could face a misdemeanor charge.

Also, the high-capacity magazines that became illegal in New York in 2013 were manufactured before 1994.

All high-capacity magazines made from 1994 on were illegal in New York prior to the Safe Act.

Read More at: http://13wham.com/news/features/featured/stories/safe-act-missing-mark-5641.shtml

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”
10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might .11 Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. 13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. 14 Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; 15 And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; 16 Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. 17 And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God: 18 Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints; but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

AGAIN: Snopes is a Disinformation Operation Website


http://worldtruth.tv/snopes-is-disinformation-operation/

cutmypic

Do you ever ask yourself one question.. why does Snopes say many of the alternative media articles are false and tries to discredit them? I mean who is ‘Snopes’? and why do people base their judgement on a website that is run by a woman and a man that uses Google search engine to discredit article, and what gives them the authority to say what article are true and what articles are not? Well this article will open your eyes and see who is behind the Snope website!

For those of you that put your trust in Snopes… you are about to wake up !!

Many of the emails that have been sent or forwarded that had any anti Obama in it were negated by Snopes. I thought that was odd. Check this out.

Snopes, Soros and the Supreme Court’s Kagan. We-l-l-l-l now, I guess the time has come to check out Snopes! You don’t suppose it might not be a good time to take a second look at some of the stuff that got kicked in the ditch by Snopes, do you?

We’ve known that it was owned by a lefty couple but hadn’t known it to be financed by Soros!

Snopes is heavily financed by George Soros, a big time supporter of Obama! In our Search for the truth department, we find what I have suspected on many occasions.

102210_1614_somuchforsn11

David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the website about 15 years ago.

I went to Snopes to check something about the dockets of the new Supreme Court Justice. Elena Kagan, who Obama appointed, and Snopes said the email was false and there were no such dockets. So I Googled the Supreme Court, typed in Obama-Kagan, and guess what? Yep, you got it; Snopes Lied! Everyone of those dockets are there.

So Here is what I wrote to Snopes:

Referencing the article about Elana Kagan and Barak Obama dockets:
The information you have posted stating that there were no such cases as claimed and the examples you gave are blatantly false. I went directly to the Supreme Courts website, typed in Obama Kagan and immediately came up with all of the dockets that the article made reference to. I have long suspected that you really slant things but this was really shocking. Thank You. I hope you will be much more truthful in the future, but I doubt it.

That being said, Ill bet you didn’t know this.

Kagan was representing Obama in all the petitions to prove his citizenship. Now she may help rule on them. Folks, this is really ugly.

Chicago Politics and the beat goes on and on and on. Once again the US Senate sold us out!

Unknown-1

Now we know why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court. Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama. She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship. He owed her big time. All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard. It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn’t it? The American people mean nothing any longer.It’s all about payback time for those who compromised themselves to elect someone who really has no true right to even be there.

Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket: You can look up some of these hearings and guess what?

Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!

scotus1

scotus2

scotus3

Check out these examples:

www.supremecourt.gov

www.supremecourt.gov

www.supremecourt.gov

sourced:

www.rense.com

asheepnomore.net

dailytwocents.com

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Whole Foods Criticized for Feeding Baltimore National Guard | Truth Revolt


 

After Whole Foods announced it was supporting law enforcement in Baltimore by providing sandwiches for the National Guard, online critics came out to criticize the store.

“We teamed up with Whole Foods Market Mt. Washington to make sandwiches for the men and women keeping Baltimore safe. We are so thankful to have them here and they’re pumped for Turkey & Cheese,” the company posted on Instagram.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Who Would’ve Thought? Obama Still Threatening Netanyahu


Who Would’ve Thought? Obama Still Threatening Netanyahu

Posted: 27 Apr 2015 11:45 PM PDT

…Sherman, who holds the title of Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs, is best known for her work on nuclear non-proliferation in both the Clinton and Obama administrations. But her real claim to fame is as the person who naively gave away the store to the North Koreans that helped them get closer to a bomb in the 1990s and learned nothing from that experience before repeating the exercise in the last few years with Iran. She defended the Iran nuclear deal she helped negotiate and assured the Reform leaders that the pact would make Israel and the world safer. But that highly debatable conclusion is less newsworthy than Sherman’s effort to fire yet another shot over Netanyahu’s bow as he completed negotiations to form his next government.

Who%2BWould've%2BThought%2B-%2BObama%2BStill%2BThreatening%2BNetanyahu.jpg
Jonathan S. Tobin..
Commentary Magazine..
27 April ’15..

What does the State Department’s Wendy Sherman do with her spare time when not negotiating weak nuclear deals with rogue regimes? The same as the rest of the Obama foreign-policy team: threaten Israel with diplomatic isolation at the United Nations. Sherman issued some thinly veiled threats yesterday in remarks to a gathering of Reform movement leaders in which she made clear that the administration expects the next Israeli government to do its bidding with respect to supporting a two-state solution with the Palestinians. While there’s nothing new about this insistence, Sherman’s language followed the same pattern as other remarks issued by U.S. officials since Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was reelected last month. But like all such warnings that have been aimed at Jerusalem from Washington, the most striking aspect of this effort is how divorced these American staffers are from the reality of a peace process that the Palestinians have no interest in pursuing.

Sherman, who holds the title of Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs, is best known for her work on nuclear non-proliferation in both the Clinton and Obama administrations. But her real claim to fame is as the person who naively gave away the store to the North Koreans that helped them get closer to a bomb in the 1990s and learned nothing from that experience before repeating the exercise in the last few years with Iran. She defended the Iran nuclear deal she helped negotiate and assured the Reform leaders that the pact would make Israel and the world safer. But that highly debatable conclusion is less newsworthy than Sherman’s effort to fire yet another shot over Netanyahu’s bow as he completed negotiations to form his next government.

According to the Times of Israel, Sherman warned that if the new government “is seen as stepping back from its commitment to a two-state solution,” that “makes our job in the international arena that much tougher.” She went on to note that the U.S. had “repeatedly stood up against efforts to delegitimize Israel or single Israel out unfairly” and that this “would continue to be the case.” But then she added that Netanyahu’s pre-election statements about the unlikelihood of a two-state solution happening had “raised questions” about the premise of U.S. support.

While Sherman’s remarks can be read in a sympathetic manner as being basically supportive of Israel—and there’s little doubt that her audience heard it that way—the message to Netanyahu was clear: any more wavering about his dedication to two-state negotiations and all bets are off in the United Nations.

But while Sherman is right when she says that most American Jews are as obsessed with willing a two-state solution into existence as the president and Secretary of State Kerry, Israelis take a different view of things.

Most of them would also like a two-state solution that would allow them to cease having responsibility for areas that are dominated by Palestinian Arabs. But unlike the Obama administration and its American Jewish cheering section on the left, the majority of Israeli voters have paid attention to events in the region in the last 20 years and know that they don’t have a viable Palestinian peace partner. It doesn’t matter whether most Israelis share the conviction that two states for two peoples is the best possible solution to the conflict. That happens to be the case, but Israelis also understood what Netanyahu was talking about the day before his stunning election victory when he said that creating a Palestinian state in the West Bank under current circumstances was an invitation to a new round of terrorist attacks on Israel.

Israelis remember what happened when their government withdrew every last soldier and settler from Gaza in 2005. Instead of trading land for peace as they hoped (and as they had vainly attempted to do with the Oslo Accords), they wound up trading land for terror. Indeed, for all the talk about the necessity of creating a Palestinian state, what Israelis understand is that the Hamas-run strip is for all intents and purposes an independent Palestinian state. The notion of repeating this experiment in the far larger and more strategic West Bank strikes most Israelis, whether they voted for Likud and its allies or Netanyahu’s main opponents, the Labor-led Zionist Union, as nuts. A two-state solution wasn’t in the cards no matter who had won the Israeli election and it won’t be brought any closer or pushed off any further into the future no matter what Netanyahu says about the idea.

That’s been the basic problem with Obama administration Middle East policy since 2009. The president came into office obsessed with the notion that more distance between Israel and the United States would tempt the Palestinians to negotiate seriously. He’s gotten the distance he wanted and then some, but the Palestinians have never budged. They’re still refusing to recognize the legitimacy of a Jewish state no matter where its borders are drawn. Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas has no real interest in being drawn into more talks where he’s faced with the choice of either saying no to peace (which he and his predecessor Yasir Arafat have repeatedly done even when a Palestinian state was offered the by the Israelis) or agreeing to something his people won’t accept. Hamas, backed up by an Iranian ally that has been empowered and embraced by Obama, exercises an effective veto on peace even if Abbas were willing or capable of signing a deal.

But that doesn’t stop the president from sending Sherman to intimate that if the Israelis don’t bow to his dictates the U.S. will no longer veto resolutions recognizing Palestinian independence without first forcing them to make peace with Israel. Clearly, that’s the direction toward which the lame duck administration is moving despite the recent talk of a Jewish charm offensive intended to disarm criticism of the president’s clear animus against the Israeli government. In the absence of significant pushback from a Democratic Party that is still in thrall to Obama, we may find out in the next 23 months whether Obama is bluffing.

Link: https://www.commentarymagazine.com/2015/04/27/obama-still-threatening-netanyahu/

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might .11 Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. 13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. 14 Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; 15 And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; 16 Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. 17 And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God: 18 Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints; but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Riots vs Baseball: Orioles game Wed. to be played privately


Updated: Tuesday, April 28 2015, 04:02 PM EDT

BALTIMORE (AP) — The Orioles will play the Chicago White Sox on Wednesday afternoon at Camden Yards in a rare Major League Baseball game closed to the public, a decision that followed rioting in Baltimore.

The announcement of the closed-doors game came after the Orioles postponed games against Chicago on Monday and Tuesday. The start of Wednesday’s game was moved up five hours to 2:05 p.m.

In addition, the Friday-to-Sunday series against Tampa Bay was shifted from Camden Yards to Tropicana Field in St. Petersburg, Florida, with Baltimore remaining the home team and batting last. Baltimore is off Thursday.

MLB said the postponed games against the White Sox will be made up with a doubleheader on May 28 at 4:05 p.m.

Public schools were shut on Tuesday in Baltimore, and the mayor imposed a 10 p.m.-to-5 a.m. curfew.

Read More at: http://13wham.com/news/features/top-stories/stories/orioles-game-wed-played-privately-22271.shtml

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Truth Report: Lawlessness and Baltimore


Mayor: Baltimore Being Destroyed by Thugs

4.28.2015
News
Brian Lilley

Maryland Governor Declares State of Emergency

4.28.2015
News
Sarah Fisher

Balto Police Commissioner to Parents: Control Your Kids

4.28.2015
News
Sarah Fisher

Maddow: The Baltimore Police Are ‘A Little Bit Out Of Control’

4.27.2015
News
Caleb Howe

Wolf Blitzer Highlights The Real Danger In Baltimore: Cops Driving Fast

4.27.2015
News
Caleb Howe

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

open.php?u=17c1e1f5483b30d67632292ac&id=0d5d6ada52&e=9fe82a295f

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

As Obama cuts Navy and Marine Officers, Iran Intercepts Cargo Ship, US Forces to Respond


2329792_G

Published on April 28th, 2015 | by Allen West Republic

0

UPDATE: The Iranian Navy has “reportedly” seized a US Cargo Ship

SHARE ON FACEBOOK
SHARE ON TWITTER

UPDATED FROM FOX NEWS:

 Capture

UPDATED: CNBC REPORTS

Conflicting reports that a U.S. cargo ship may or may not have been seized by the Iranian military in the Persian Gulf roiled markets on Tuesday morning.

The Pentagon later reported that the Maersk Tigris did not have any U.S. citizens aboard and was traveling through the Strait of Hormuz when the incident occurred.

Al Arabiya, the Saudi news network, initially reported that a U.S. vessel has been fired on and steered to the Bandar Abbas port by Iran. Iran’s Fars News Agency also reported that an “American trade vessel” had been confiscated.

Capture2

RT.COM REPORTS: 

The Iranian Navy has reportedly seized a US ship with 34 crew members on board, for violating Iran’s waters in the Persian Gulf. An Iranian warship is taking the vessel to the city of Bandar Abbas, Fars and Al Arabiya report.

According to Al Arabiya, the Iranian Navy opened fire in the direction of the ship before seizing it.

The nationalities of the crew members are unknown.

DETAILS TO FOLLOW

TELEGRAPH REPORTS:

An Iranian force has seized a US cargo ship with 34 crew on board and directed it to an Iranian port, the Saudi-owned broadcaster Al Arabiya has reported.

Source: Iran forces ‘seize US cargo ship’ – Telegraph

BBC REPORT:

The Iranian navy has seized a US cargo ship and escorted it to the Iranian port of Bandar Abbas, media reports say.

There has been no official confirmation of the incident from either Iranian or American officials.

Reports say the vessel had 34 crew aboard at the time.

Iran’s semi-official Fars news agency said the vessel had been detained “for trespassing on Iran’s territorial waters”.

SOURCE: BBC

Al Arabiya News Report:

Iran has fired at a U.S. cargo ship and has directed it to Bandar Abbas port on the southern coast of Iran, Al Arabiya News Channel has reported on Tuesday.

Up to 34 American sailors are believed to be onboard the ship, Al Arabiya reported.

(developing story)

TIMES OF ISRAEL REPORT:

US Navy called in after Iran fires at cargo ship in gulf

Pentagon says Iranian navy sent warning shots at Marshall Islands-flagged Maersk Tigris, denying reports Iranian navy took over US cargo ship and detained crew

Iranian patrol vessels fired warning shots across the bridge of a Marshall Islands-flagged cargo vessel that was traversing the Strait of Hormuz in Iranian territorial waters, a Pentagon official said Tuesday.

The comment came after a Saudi report claimed Tehran had captured a US ship and detained 34 soldiers aboard.

MORE HERE

2329792_G

635658173845802583-99-Turn-Burn-md Published on April 28th, 2015 | by Allen West Republic http://allenwestrepublic.com/2015/04/28/iran-intercepts-cargo-ship-us-forces-to-respond/

Iran Intercepts Cargo Ship, US Forces to Respond

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER The U.S. is responsible for security of Marshall Islands. The Straits of Hormuz are covered under freedom of the seas. This is a provocation! ~ PDC Washington (CNN) Iran seizes commercial ship, U.S. forces respond Iran Revolutionary Guard patrol boats fired shots at a commercial cargo ship and then intercepted the vessel, the M/V Maersk Tigris, which was crossing the Strait of Hormuz Tuesday morning, according to a senior U.S. military official. Despite reports in some media, there are no Americans on board, the official said. Pentagon spokesman Col. Steve Warren said it was “inappropriate” for the Iranians to fire the warning shot. The U.S. Navy has dispatched one maritime patrol and reconnaissance aircraft to observe and monitor the situation, Warren told reporters. The ship, a Marshall Islands-flagged vessel, was transiting the Strait into the Persian Gulf on an internationally recognized maritime route when the the Iranian military contacted the vessel and directed the ship master to “divert further into Iranian waters,” according to Warren. “The master was contacted and directed to proceed further into Iranian territorial waters. He declined and one of the IRGCN craft fired shots across the bridge of the Maersk Tigris,” said Warren, referring to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy. “The master complied with the Iranian demand and proceeded into Iranian waters in the vicinity of Larak Island.”

FINISH THE CNN REPORT AND VIDEO HERE

Source: Iran Intercepts Cargo Ship, US Moves to Respond After receiving a distress signal from the cargo ship, Naval Forces Central Command dispatched the destroyer Farragut to proceed at best speed to the location of the Maersk and has sent a single maritime patrol and reconnaissance aircraft to observe the situation, Warren said. He did not clarify what that aircraft was, but the Navy counts both the P-3 and P-8 under that designation. Warren said that it is “unlikely” Farragut would enter Iranian territory. He added that there were no American citizens onboard the vessel, which has a crew of about 30. Warren said that at first glance the situation “seems to be provocative” on the part of the Iranian ships, but noted that there are still gaps of information about the initial incident. “It is inappropriate” on the part of the Iranian forces, he added. The past week has seen a spike in tensions between the two countries after US Navy ships began shadowing a convoy of Iranian cargo ships that the Pentagon believed may be carrying weapons to aid militant forces in Yemen. That situation dispersed last week when the Iranian convoy turned away from Yemen, but no doubt remains fresh in the minds of both nations. Asked if the seizure of the Maersk was retaliation for last week’s standoff, Warren said there was “no way to know” at this time. Craig Allen, a professor at the University of Washington with an expertise in maritime law, called Iran’s actions “highly unusual.” “Iran often beats its chest about shutting down this strait as a countermeasure to Western aggression, but it’s all been talk up to this point,” Allen said. “Actually pulling a commercial vessel out and pulling it into an Iranian port, I’m shocked.” Allen explained that the Strait of Hormuz operates under the law of transit passage as laid out by a 1982 UN convention on the law of the sea. Although neither the US nor Iran signed that convention, the nations have treated the rules of navigation transit as legally binding. The rules of transit passage guarantees any vessel the right to use the strait with only “very limited” restrictions, Allen said. Those restrictions include if the ship is not proceeding without delay through the strait or is excessively polluting. Those rules seem to be broad enough that Iran could claim a violation —

CONTINUE READING HERE

635658173845802583-99-Turn-Burn-md I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

2 MILITARY COMMANDERS RELIEVED OF DUTY! Marine Corp CDR and US Navy CAPT


Collage

Published on April 28th, 2015 | by Allen West Republic

http://allenwestrepublic.com/2015/04/28/2-military-commanders-relieved-of-duty-marine-corp-cdr-and-us-navy-capt/

2 MILITARY COMMANDERS RELIEVED OF DUTY! Marine Corp CDR and US Navy CAPT

SHARE ON FACEBOOK
SHARE ON TWITTER

Marine Corp Times Report:

The commanding officer of Marine Corps Base Hawaii was relieved of his duties Monday following “a loss of trust and confidence in his ability to lead,” the service said.

Col. Eric Schaefer, who assumed command of the base in August, was removed from his post by Maj. Gen. Charles Hudson, the commanding general of Marine Corps Installations Pacific, according to a Marine Corps news release. Schaefer was reassigned to another position effective immediately.

“The Marine Corps holds all Marines, especially commanders, responsible for their actions, and is committed to upholding high standards of honor, courage and commitment within the ranks,” the release states.

No additional details about the relief or Schaefer’s new position were immediately available. Schaefer could not immediately be reached for comment.

Col. Christopher Snyder, the deputy commander of Marine Corps Installations Pacific, has been assigned as the interim commanding officer of Marine Corps Base Hawaii until a permanent replacement is named by Headquarters Marine Corps.

Schaefer, a career aviator with more than 2,000 flight hours, graduated from San Diego State University in 1991, according to his official Marine Corps biography. He served as the commanding officer of Marine Attack Squadron 214, which was named the Marine aviation attack squadron of the year in 2009 following a deployment to Afghanistan’s Helmand province.

FULL STORY HERE

REPORTED BY US NAVY:

From Commander, Naval Surface Force U.S. Pacific Fleet Public Affairs

SAN DIEGO (NNS) — The commanding officer of USS Lake Erie (CG 70) was relieved of his duties April 27, due to loss of confidence in his ability to command.

Capt. John Banigan was relieved by Rear Adm. Dee Mewbourne, commander of Carrier Strike Group 11. The decision was based on the findings of an investigation into poor command climate aboard Lake Erie, a guided-missile cruiser homeported in San Diego.
Banigan assumed command of the ship in May 2013. He has been temporarily assigned to the staff of Commander, Naval Surface Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet.
Capt. Douglas Kunzman, deputy commander of Destroyer Squadron 9, will temporarily assume command of Lake Erie pending assignment of a permanent relief.

FULL REPORT HERE

Collage

2 MILITARY COMMANDERS RELIEVED OF DUTY!

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Satan and Children’s Cartoons….


“Where’s the crux of the problem? It’s in the fact that the parents are so programmed themselves, they just don’t want to hear about it. Most prefer to remain comfortable watching their own favored propaganda, while telling themselves that people like yours truly are just grasping at straws. Meanwhile their children are being indoctrinated to service pedophiles.”
April 27, 2015
S3e8_Power_shriek.png
(Left, Cartoon Network’s Adventure Time )
A Texas mother’s shocking discovery: Children’s
cartoons are being used to degrade her children
and indoctrinate them on issues like gender.
by LS
(henrymakow.com)

Hello Henry. I’ve been following your site for quite some time now and I’ve learned a lot from your writings. One of the best things I’ve learned from you is that mainstream entertainment is satanic and made to corrupt the masses.

Well, I’ve been noticing that many of the children’s television programs are getting worse and worse as time goes on. These shows are just getting nasty, and they are blatant with the filth they are putting out. I watch these shows with my kids and the filth that I see is shocking. Here are a few examples of the trash that these shows put out for the masses. Remember that these shows are geared towards CHILDREN!

First there is the Nickelodeon television show Nicky, Ricky, Dicky and Dawn. One of the episodes is titled “Poo Dunnit”, a wordplay on the phrase “Who Dunnit”. That entire episode is about the kids and their parents trying to find out which one of them took a sh!t in one of the house toilets and didn’t flush. Yes, the entire episode revolved around a clump of sh!t in a toilet. The foul-mouthed potty humor and the talks about sh!t in this episode were so disgusting.

The word “poop” was even used three times in one sentence by one of the child characters. At one point in the episode, the children were actually examining the piece of sh!t in the toilet and one of them stated it looked like a flamingo. In your past writings you stated that the illuminati entertainment has an obsession with feces and bodily functions like sh!tting. Well, this entire episode was one big tribute to that sick obsession.

Then there is the Cartoon Network show Adventure Time. This show is already full of questionable material, but here I’ll only focus on two bits that I’ve noticed.

The first is a quote from one of characters. In one of the more recent episodes titled “Friends Forever”, a character stated that, “Well, one isn’t purely defined by their sex or gender. I’ve yet to find out who I really am…”

This is exactly the same propaganda that is spouted by illuminati feminist and homosexual groups to encourage gender confusion and the destruction of male and female. Then there is yet another quote from a character in a different episode titled “All the Little People”.

The character, who is a crafty magician, says “Do what thou swill be the whole piece of law”.

This is a blatant reference to the notable quote of Satanist Aleister Crowley: “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law”. I’m sure I don’t need to explain any further why this is horribly wrong.

These are just the things that I’ve picked up on while watching these children’s shows with my kids, I’m sure there’s a lot more out there. Mainstream entertainment is sick and corrupt. I’m glad I’ve found your site so that I can see what is really happening to the world. Thanks.

Related: (Thanks Justin)
The President of Hollywood According to Tom and Jerry
Simpsons: http://simpsons.wikia.com/wiki/We_Do_(The_Stonecutters%27_Song)
Donald duck eye chart says “ask about illuminati”
also
Scary documentary from the Ukraine on American cartoons. It starts out with subtitles but a few minutes in there is an English narrator.

First Comment by Anonymous:

I just watched 5 minutes of the show in question, R.N.D.D., for the first time ever. Here’s what I saw: The kids are in school, building a white volcano for science class. The volcano inadvertently erupts gobs and gobs of white foam all over the kids, who make a game of it, throwing and smearing it on one another. In the background throughout the scene, there are ‘butterflies’ hanging on the wall. Their teacher, while reprimanding the kids, makes a veiled ‘sign of Baphomet’ with one hand, and the girl (Dawn), is wearing a t-shirt with a picture of a ‘cat’ that’s got some
kind of device over the top of its head that’s covered in a two-tone masonic print. If you’re unfamiliar with these motifs, explanations can be found online easily enough. More jarring than anything was the way these kids act like the “adults” I remember from sitcoms. Their manner is utterly unnatural.

On a side note, I can only guess that the reference in the “Poo” episode to it looking like a flamingo is a reference to the John Waters film ‘Pink Flamingoes’ – a barage of filth that culminates with a character named “Divine” actually consuming fecal matter in the process of filming.

Big ups to the mother who has the good sense to be aware of what’s happening in her child’s life. Here’s my point: It doesn’t matter what you watch; you will find PROGRAMING, in almost, EVERY SHOT. For what its worth, I recommend listening to what Alan Watt, (not alan Watt[s]), has to say on the matter. His broadcasts are on youtube. In one, he mentions how a friend, who’d worked for one of those 3-letter organizations, once advised him: NEVER WATCH THE TELEVISION.

Where’s the crux of the problem? It’s in the fact that the parents are so programmed themselves, they just don’t want to hear about it. Most prefer to remain comfortable watching their own favored propaganda, while telling themselves that people like yours truly are just grasping at straws. Meanwhile their children are being indoctrinated to service pedophiles. – See more at: http://henrymakow.com/2015/04/Mother-Shocked-to-See-Satanic-Messages.html#sthash.5gDgLaka.dpuf

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Surprised? Israel simply isn’t one of the Arab world’s major problems anymore


Surprised? Israel simply isn’t one of the Arab world’s major problems anymore

Posted: 25 Apr 2015 01:03 PM PDT

…What the poll shows, in a nutshell, is that young Arabs have reached the same conclusion Arab leaders made glaringly evident at the last year’s inaugural session of the Abu Dhabi Strategic Debate: Israel simply isn’t one of the Arab world’s major problems anymore, if it ever was. Now all Israel needs is for the West to finally come to the same realization.

Surprised%2B-%2BIsrael%2Bsimply%2Bisn%E2%80%99t%2Bone%2Bof%2Bthe%2BArab%2Bworld%E2%80%99s%2Bmajor%2Bproblems%2Banymore.jpg
Evelyn Gordon..
Commentary Magazine..
24 April ’15..

One of the most positive strategic developments for Israel of the past few years has been its marked improvement in relations with significant parts of the Arab world. Three years ago, for instance, the most cockeyed optimist wouldn’t have predicted a letter like Israel received this week from a senior official of the Free Syrian Army, who congratulated it on its 67th anniversary and voiced hope that next year, Israel’s Independence Day would be celebrated at an Israeli embassy in Damascus.

Yet many analysts have cautioned that even if Arab leaders were quietly cooperating with Israel for reasons of realpolitik, anti-Israel hostility in the “Arab street” hadn’t abated. So a new poll showing that this, too, is changing came as a lovely Independence Day gift.

The ASDA’A Burson-Marsteller Arab Youth Survey, which has been conducted annually for the last seven years, polls 3,500 Arabs aged 18 to 24 from 16 Arab countries in face-to-face interviews. One of the standard questions is “What do you believe is the biggest obstacle facing the Middle East?”

This year, defying a long tradition of blaming all the Arab world’s problems on Israel, only 23 percent of respondents cited the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as the region’s main obstacle. In fact, the conflict came in fourth, trailing ISIS (37 percent), terrorism (32 percent) and unemployment (29 percent). Given that respondents were evidently allowed to choose more than one of the 15 options (the total adds up to 235 percent rather than 100), it’s even more noteworthy that only 23 percent thought the conflict worth mentioning.

A comparison to previous surveys shows that this figure has been declining slowly but steadily for the past few years: In 2012, for instance, it was 27 percent, a statistically significant difference given the poll’s margin of error (1.65 percent). But the 2015 decline is particularly remarkable because last summer’s war in Gaza made the past year the conflict’s bloodiest in decades for Palestinians. Hence one would have expected Arab concern about the conflict to increase. Instead, it dropped.

The poll also highlights another encouraging fact: The issues young Arabs do see as their top concerns–ISIS, terrorism, and unemployment–are all issues on which cooperation with Israel could be beneficial, and in some cases, it’s already taking place. For instance, Israeli-Egyptian cooperation on counterterrorism is closer than it’s been in years–not only against Hamas, but also against the ISIS branch in Sinai, Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis. Israel and Jordan cooperate closely on counterterrorism as well, and it’s a safe bet that quiet cooperation is also occurring with certain other Arab states that officially have no relations with Israel.

Egypt and Israel have also ramped up economic cooperation, even manning a joint booth at a major trade fair earlier this year.

In short, the issues currently of greatest concern to young Arabs are precisely the issues most conducive to a further thawing of Israeli-Arab relations.

What the poll shows, in a nutshell, is that young Arabs have reached the same conclusion Arab leaders made glaringly evident at the last year’s inaugural session of the Abu Dhabi Strategic Debate: Israel simply isn’t one of the Arab world’s major problems anymore, if it ever was. Now all Israel needs is for the West to finally come to the same realization.

Link: https://www.commentarymagazine.com/2015/04/24/young-arabs-agree-israel-isnt-arab-worlds-major-problem/

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

“2015 New AARP Commercial Announces Martial Law Declared!”


https://youtu.be/5VdPyusbbCA

mqdefault.jpg
2015 New AARP Commercial Announces Martial Law Declared!
by Icelandic Watchman
Wow subliminals and background staging and voices always tell you what is coming wow,,,

gen_204

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Outside Baltimore Protesters Arrive – Confused, Perplexed – “Man this is weird”….


Originally posted on The Last Refuge:

The beacon signal was activated: National Action Network (NAN), National Association For The Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), Nation of Islam (NoI), New Black Panther Party (NBPP), AME Church Network and all their leadership responded.  Buses were brought in from around the region to supply hundreds of foot soldiers for the marches and protests.

baltimore 7

Then comes the Ferguson Protesters, Madison groups and professional grievance advocates from around the country arriving en masse.

View original 161 more words

Posted in Uncategorized

National Intrusion and Permission to TAKE everything and ANYTHING they want: National Defense Resources Preparedness


The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release
March 16, 2012

Executive Order — National Defense Resources Preparedness

EXECUTIVE ORDER

NATIONAL DEFENSE RESOURCES PREPAREDNESS

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2061 et seq.), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, and as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows:
PART I  –  PURPOSE, POLICY, AND IMPLEMENTATION
Section 101Purpose.  This order delegates authorities and addresses national defense resource policies and programs under the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (the “Act”).
Sec. 102Policy.  The United States must have an industrial and technological base capable of meeting national defense requirements and capable of contributing to the technological superiority of its national defense equipment in peacetime and in times of national emergency.  The domestic industrial and technological base is the foundation for national defense preparedness.  The authorities provided in the Act shall be used to strengthen this base and to ensure it is capable of responding to the national defense needs of the United States.
Sec. 103General Functions.  Executive departments and agencies (agencies) responsible for plans and programs relating to national defense (as defined in section 801(j) of this order), or for resources and services needed to support such plans and programs, shall:
(a)  identify requirements for the full spectrum of emergencies, including essential military and civilian demand;
(b)  assess on an ongoing basis the capability of the domestic industrial and technological base to satisfy requirements in peacetime and times of national emergency, specifically evaluating the availability of the most critical resource and production sources, including subcontractors and suppliers, materials, skilled labor, and professional and technical personnel;
(c)  be prepared, in the event of a potential threat to the security of the United States, to take actions necessary to ensure the availability of adequate resources and production capability, including services and critical technology, for national defense requirements;
(d)  improve the efficiency and responsiveness of the domestic industrial base to support national defense requirements; and
(e)  foster cooperation between the defense and commercial sectors for research and development and for acquisition of materials, services, components, and equipment to enhance industrial base efficiency and responsiveness.
Sec. 104Implementation.  (a)  The National Security Council and Homeland Security Council, in conjunction with the National Economic Council, shall serve as the integrated policymaking forum for consideration and formulation of national defense resource preparedness policy and shall make recommendations to the President on the use of authorities under the Act.

(b)  The Secretary of Homeland Security shall:

(1)  advise the President on issues of national defense resource preparedness and on the use of the authorities and functions delegated by this order;

(2)  provide for the central coordination of the plans and programs incident to authorities and functions delegated under this order, and provide guidance to agencies assigned functions under this order, developed in consultation with such agencies; and

(3)  report to the President periodically concerning all program activities conducted pursuant to this order.

(c)  The Defense Production Act Committee, described in section 701 of this order, shall:

(1)  in a manner consistent with section 2(b) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2062(b), advise the President through the Assistant to the President and National Security Advisor, the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, and the Assistant to the President for Economic Policy on the effective use of the authorities under the Act; and

(2)  prepare and coordinate an annual report to the Congress pursuant to section 722(d) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2171(d).

(d)  The Secretary of Commerce, in cooperation with the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and other agencies, shall:

(1)  analyze potential effects of national emergencies on actual production capability, taking into account the entire production system, including shortages of resources, and develop recommended preparedness measures to strengthen capabilities for production increases in national emergencies; and

(2)  perform industry analyses to assess capabilities of the industrial base to support the national defense, and develop policy recommendations to improve the international competitiveness of specific domestic industries and their abilities to meet national defense program needs.

PART II  –  PRIORITIES AND ALLOCATIONS
Sec. 201Priorities and Allocations Authorities.  (a)  The authority of the President conferred by section 101 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071, to require acceptance and priority performance of contracts or orders (other than contracts of employment) to promote the national defense over performance of any other contracts or orders, and to allocate materials, services, and facilities as deemed necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense, is delegated to the following agency heads:

(1)  the Secretary of Agriculture with respect to food resources, food resource facilities, livestock resources, veterinary resources, plant health resources, and the domestic distribution of farm equipment and commercial fertilizer;

(2)  the Secretary of Energy with respect to all forms of energy;

(3)  the Secretary of Health and Human Services with respect to health resources;

(4)  the Secretary of Transportation with respect to all forms of civil transportation;

(5)  the Secretary of Defense with respect to water resources; and

(6)  the Secretary of Commerce with respect to all other materials, services, and facilities, including construction materials.

(b)  The Secretary of each agency delegated authority under subsection (a) of this section (resource departments) shall plan for and issue regulations to prioritize and allocate resources and establish standards and procedures by which the authority shall be used to promote the national defense, under both emergency and non-emergency conditions.  Each Secretary shall authorize the heads of other agencies, as appropriate, to place priority ratings on contracts and orders for materials, services, and facilities needed in support of programs approved under section 202 of this order.
(c)  Each resource department shall act, as necessary and appropriate, upon requests for special priorities assistance, as defined by section 801(l) of this order, in a time frame consistent with the urgency of the need at hand.  In situations where there are competing program requirements for limited resources, the resource department shall consult with the Secretary who made the required determination under section 202 of this order.  Such Secretary shall coordinate with and identify for the resource department which program requirements to prioritize on the basis of operational urgency.  In situations involving more than one Secretary making such a required determination under section 202 of this order, the Secretaries shall coordinate with and identify for the resource department which program requirements should receive priority on the basis of operational urgency.
(d)  If agreement cannot be reached between two such Secretaries, then the issue shall be referred to the President through the Assistant to the President and National Security Advisor and the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism.
(e)  The Secretary of each resource department, when necessary, shall make the finding required under section 101(b) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071(b).  This finding shall be submitted for the President’s approval through the Assistant to the President and National Security Advisor and the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism.  Upon such approval, the Secretary of the resource department that made the finding may use the authority of section 101(a) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071(a), to control the general distribution of any material (including applicable services) in the civilian market.
Sec. 202Determinations.  Except as provided in section 201(e) of this order, the authority delegated by section 201 of this order may be used only to support programs that have been determined in writing as necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense:

(a)  by the Secretary of Defense with respect to military production and construction, military assistance to foreign nations, military use of civil transportation, stockpiles managed by the Department of Defense, space, and directly related activities;

(b)  by the Secretary of Energy with respect to energy production and construction, distribution and use, and directly related activities; and

(c)  by the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to all other national defense programs, including civil defense and continuity of Government.

Sec. 203Maximizing Domestic Energy Supplies.  The authorities of the President under section 101(c)(1) (2) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071(c)(1) (2), are delegated to the Secretary of Commerce, with the exception that the authority to make findings that materials (including equipment), services, and facilities are critical and essential, as described in section 101(c)(2)(A) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071(c)(2)(A), is delegated to the Secretary of Energy.
Sec. 204Chemical and Biological Warfare.  The authority of the President conferred by section 104(b) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2074(b), is delegated to the Secretary of Defense.  This authority may not be further delegated by the Secretary.
PART III  –  EXPANSION OF PRODUCTIVE CAPACITY AND SUPPLY
Sec. 301Loan Guarantees.  (a)  To reduce current or projected shortfalls of resources, critical technology items, or materials essential for the national defense, the head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense, as defined in section 801(h) of this order, is authorized pursuant to section 301 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2091, to guarantee loans by private institutions. [like 401K and pension/retirement accounts]

(b)  Each guaranteeing agency is designated and authorized to:  (1) act as fiscal agent in the making of its own guarantee contracts and in otherwise carrying out the purposes of section 301 of the Act; and (2) contract with any Federal Reserve Bank to assist the agency in serving as fiscal agent.
(c)  Terms and conditions of guarantees under this authority shall be determined in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).  The guaranteeing agency is authorized, following such consultation, to prescribe:  (1) either specifically or by maximum limits or otherwise, rates of interest, guarantee and commitment fees, and other charges which may be made in connection with such guarantee contracts; and (2) regulations governing the forms and procedures (which shall be uniform to the extent practicable) to be utilized in connection therewith.
Sec. 302Loans.  To reduce current or projected shortfalls of resources, critical technology items, or materials essential for the national defense, the head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense is delegated the authority of the President under section 302 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2092, to make loans thereunder.  Terms and conditions of loans under this authority shall be determined in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Director of OMB.
Sec. 303 Additional Authorities.  (a)  To create, maintain, protect, expand, or restore domestic industrial base capabilities essential for the national defense, the head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense is delegated the authority of the President under section 303 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2093, to make provision for purchases of, or commitments to purchase, an industrial resource or a critical technology item for Government use or resale, and to make provision for the development of production capabilities, and for the increased use of emerging technologies in security program applications, and to enable rapid transition of emerging technologies.
(b)  Materials acquired under section 303 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2093, that exceed the needs of the programs under the Act may be transferred to the National Defense Stockpile, if, in the judgment of the Secretary of Defense as the National Defense Stockpile Manager, such transfers are in the public interest.
Sec. 304Subsidy Payments.  To ensure the supply of raw or nonprocessed materials from high cost sources, or to ensure maximum production or supply in any area at stable prices of any materials in light of a temporary increase in transportation cost, the head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense is delegated the authority of the President under section 303(c) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2093(c), to make subsidy payments, after consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Director of OMB.
Sec. 305Determinations and Findings.  (a)  Pursuant to budget authority provided by an appropriations act in advance for credit assistance under section 301 or 302 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2091, 2092, and consistent with the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990, as amended (FCRA), 2 U.S.C. 661 et seq., the head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense is delegated the authority to make the determinations set forth in sections 301(a)(2) and 302(b)(2) of the Act, in consultation with the Secretary making the required determination under section 202 of this order; provided, that such determinations shall be made after due consideration of the provisions of OMB Circular A 129 and the credit subsidy score for the relevant loan or loan guarantee as approved by OMB pursuant to FCRA.
(b)  Other than any determination by the President under section 303(a)(7)(b) of the Act, the head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense is delegated the authority to make the required determinations, judgments, certifications, findings, and notifications defined under section 303 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2093, in consultation with the Secretary making the required determination under section 202 of this order.
Sec. 306Strategic and Critical Materials.  The Secretary of Defense, and the Secretary of the Interior in consultation with the Secretary of Defense as the National Defense Stockpile Manager, are each delegated the authority of the President under section 303(a)(1)(B) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2093(a)(1)(B), to encourage the exploration, development, and mining of strategic and critical materials and other materials.
Sec. 307Substitutes.  The head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense is delegated the authority of the President under section 303(g) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2093(g), to make provision for the development of substitutes for strategic and critical materials, critical components, critical technology items, and other resources to aid the national defense.
Sec. 308Government-Owned Equipment.  The head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense is delegated the authority of the President under section 303(e) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2093(e), to:
(a)  procure and install additional equipment, facilities, processes, or improvements to plants, factories, and other industrial facilities owned by the Federal Government and to procure and install Government owned equipment in plants, factories, or other industrial facilities owned by private persons;
(b)  provide for the modification or expansion of privately owned facilities, including the modification or improvement of production processes, when taking actions under sections 301, 302, or 303 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2091, 2092, 2093; and
(c)  sell or otherwise transfer equipment owned by the Federal Government and installed under section 303(e) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2093(e), to the owners of such plants, factories, or other industrial facilities.
Sec. 309Defense Production Act Fund.  The Secretary of Defense is designated the Defense Production Act Fund Manager, in accordance with section 304(f) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2094(f), and shall carry out the duties specified in section 304 of the Act, in consultation with the agency heads having approved, and appropriated funds for, projects under title III of the Act.
Sec. 310Critical Items.  The head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense is delegated the authority of the President under section 107(b)(1) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2077(b)(1), to take appropriate action to ensure that critical components, critical technology items, essential materials, and industrial resources are available from reliable sources when needed to meet defense requirements during peacetime, graduated mobilization, and national emergency.  Appropriate action may include restricting contract solicitations to reliable sources, restricting contract solicitations to domestic sources (pursuant to statutory authority), stockpiling critical components, and developing substitutes for critical components or critical technology items.
Sec. 311Strengthening Domestic Capability.  The head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense is delegated the authority of the President under section 107(a) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2077(a), to utilize the authority of title III of the Act or any other provision of law to provide appropriate incentives to develop, maintain, modernize, restore, and expand the productive capacities of domestic sources for critical components, critical technology items, materials, and industrial resources essential for the execution of the national security strategy of the United States.
Sec. 312Modernization of Equipment.  The head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense, in accordance with section 108(b) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2078(b), may utilize the authority of title III of the Act to guarantee the purchase or lease of advance manufacturing equipment, and any related services with respect to any such equipment for purposes of the Act.  In considering title III projects, the head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense shall provide a strong preference for proposals submitted by a small business supplier or subcontractor in accordance with section 108(b)(2) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2078(b)(2).
PART IV  –  VOLUNTARY AGREEMENTS AND ADVISORY COMMITTEES
Sec. 401Delegations.  The authority of the President under sections 708(c) and (d) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2158(c), (d), is delegated to the heads of agencies otherwise delegated authority under this order.  The status of the use of such delegations shall be furnished to the Secretary of Homeland Security.
Sec. 402Advisory Committees.  The authority of the President under section 708(d) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2158(d), and delegated in section 401 of this order (relating to establishment of advisory committees) shall be exercised only after consultation with, and in accordance with, guidelines and procedures established by the Administrator of General Services.
Sec. 403Regulations.  The Secretary of Homeland Security, after approval of the Attorney General, and after consultation by the Attorney General with the Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission, shall promulgate [ to make (as a doctrine) known by open declaration :  proclaim a :  to make known or  public the terms of (a proposed law) b :  to put (a law) into action or force]

rules pursuant to section 708(e) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2158(e), incorporating standards and procedures by which voluntary agreements and plans of action may be developed and carried out.  Such rules may be adopted by other agencies to fulfill the rulemaking requirement of section 708(e) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2158(e).

PART V  –  EMPLOYMENT OF PERSONNEL
Sec. 501National Defense Executive Reserve.  (a) In accordance with section 710(e) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2160(e), there is established in the executive branch a National Defense Executive Reserve (NDER) composed of persons of recognized expertise from various segments of the private sector and from Government (except full time Federal employees) for training for employment in executive positions in the Federal Government in the event of a national defense emergency.
(b)  The Secretary of Homeland Security shall issue necessary guidance for the NDER program, including appropriate guidance for establishment, recruitment, training, monitoring, and activation of NDER units and shall be responsible for the overall coordination of the NDER program.  The authority of the President under section 710(e) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2160(e), to determine periods of national defense emergency is delegated to the Secretary of Homeland Security.
(c)  The head of any agency may implement section 501(a) of this order with respect to NDER operations in such agency.
(d)  The head of each agency with an NDER unit may exercise the authority under section 703 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2153, to employ civilian personnel when activating all or a part of its NDER unit.  The exercise of this authority shall be subject to the provisions of sections 501(e) and (f) of this order and shall not be redelegated.
(e)  The head of an agency may activate an NDER unit, in whole or in part, upon the written determination of the Secretary of Homeland Security that an emergency affecting the national defense exists and that the activation of the unit is necessary to carry out the emergency program functions of the agency.
(f)  Prior to activating the NDER unit, the head of the agency shall notify, in writing, the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism of the impending activation.
Sec. 502Consultants.  The head of each agency otherwise delegated functions under this order is delegated the authority of the President under sections 710(b) and (c) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2160(b), (c), to employ persons of outstanding experience and ability without compensation and to employ experts, consultants, or organizations.  The authority delegated by this section may not be redelegated.
PART VI  –  LABOR REQUIREMENTS
Sec. 601Secretary of Labor.  (a)  The Secretary of Labor, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and the heads of other agencies, as deemed appropriate by the Secretary of Labor, shall:

(1)  collect and maintain data necessary to make a continuing appraisal of the Nation’s workforce needs for purposes of national defense;

(2)  upon request by the Director of Selective Service, and in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, assist the Director of Selective Service in development of policies regulating the induction and deferment of persons for duty in the armed services;

(3)  upon request from the head of an agency with authority under this order, consult with that agency with respect to:  (i) the effect of contemplated actions on labor demand and utilization; (ii) the relation of labor demand to materials and facilities requirements; and (iii) such other matters as will assist in making the exercise of priority and allocations functions consistent with effective utilization and distribution of labor;

(4)  upon request from the head of an agency with authority under this order:  (i) formulate plans, programs, and policies for meeting the labor requirements of actions to be taken for national defense purposes; and (ii) estimate training needs to help address national defense requirements and promote necessary and appropriate training programs; and

(5)  develop and implement an effective labor management relations policy to support the activities and programs under this order, with the cooperation of other agencies as deemed appropriate by the Secretary of Labor, [effectively taking over these civilian boards] including the National Labor Relations Board, the Federal Labor Relations Authority, the National Mediation Board, and the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.

(b)  All agencies shall cooperate with the Secretary of Labor, upon request, for the purposes of this section, to the extent permitted by law.
PART VII  –  DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT COMMITTEE
Sec. 701The Defense Production Act Committee.  (a)  The Defense Production Act Committee (Committee) shall be composed of the following members, in accordance with section 722(b) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2171(b):

(1)   The Secretary of State;

(2)   The Secretary of the Treasury;

(3)   The Secretary of Defense;

(4)   The Attorney General;

(5)   The Secretary of the Interior;

(6)   The Secretary of Agriculture;

(7)   The Secretary of Commerce;

(8)   The Secretary of Labor;

(9)   The Secretary of Health and Human Services;

(10)  The Secretary of Transportation;

(11)  The Secretary of Energy;

(12)  The Secretary of Homeland Security;

(13)  The Director of National Intelligence;

(14)  The Director of the Central Intelligence Agency;

(15)  The Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers;

(16)  The Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; and

(17)  The Administrator of General Services.

(b)  The Director of OMB and the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall be invited to participate in all Committee meetings and activities in an advisory role.  The Chairperson, as designated by the President pursuant to section 722 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2171, may invite the heads of other agencies or offices to participate in Committee meetings and activities in an advisory role, as appropriate.
Sec. 702Offsets.  The Secretary of Commerce shall prepare and submit to the Congress the annual report required by section 723 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2172, in consultation with the Secretaries of State, the Treasury, Defense, and Labor, the United States Trade Representative, the Director of National Intelligence, and the heads of other agencies as appropriate.  The heads of agencies shall provide the Secretary of Commerce with such information as may be necessary for the effective performance of this function.
PART VIII  –  GENERAL PROVISIONS
Sec. 801Definitions.  In addition to the definitions in section 702 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2152, the following definitions apply throughout this order:
(a)  “Civil transportation” includes movement of persons and property by all modes of transportation in interstate, intrastate, or foreign commerce within the United States, its territories and possessions, and the District of Columbia, and related public storage and warehousing, ports, services, equipment and facilities, such as transportation carrier shop and repair facilities.  “Civil transportation” also shall include direction, control, and coordination of civil transportation capacity regardless of ownership.  “Civil transportation” shall not include transportation owned or controlled by the Department of Defense, use of petroleum and gas pipelines, and coal slurry pipelines used only to supply energy production facilities directly.
(b)  “Energy” means all forms of energy including petroleum, gas (both natural and manufactured), electricity, solid fuels (including all forms of coal, coke, coal chemicals, coal liquification, and coal gasification), solar, wind, other types of renewable energy, atomic energy, and the production, conservation, use, control, and distribution (including pipelines) of all of these forms of energy.
(c)  “Farm equipment” means equipment, machinery, and repair parts manufactured for use on farms in connection with the production or preparation for market use of food resources.
(d)  “Fertilizer” means any product or combination of products that contain one or more of the elements nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium for use as a plant nutrient.
(e)  “Food resources” means all commodities and products, (simple, mixed, or compound), or complements to such commodities or products, that are capable of being ingested by either human beings or animals, irrespective of other uses to which such commodities or products may be put, at all stages of processing from the raw commodity to the products thereof in vendible form for human or animal consumption.  “Food resources” also means potable water packaged in commercially marketable containers, all starches, sugars, vegetable and animal or marine fats and oils, seed, cotton, hemp, and flax fiber, but does not mean any such material after it loses its identity as an agricultural commodity or agricultural product.
(f)  “Food resource facilities” means plants, machinery, vehicles (including on farm), and other facilities required for the production, processing, distribution, and storage (including cold storage) of food resources, and for the domestic distribution of farm equipment and fertilizer (excluding transportation thereof).
(g)  “Functions” include powers, duties, authority, responsibilities, and discretion.
(h)  “Head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense” means the heads of the Departments of State, Justice, the Interior, and Homeland Security, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the General Services Administration, and all other agencies with authority delegated under section 201 of this order.
(i)  “Health resources” means drugs, biological products, medical devices, materials, facilities, health supplies, services and equipment required to diagnose, mitigate or prevent the impairment of, improve, treat, cure, or restore the physical or mental health conditions of the population.
(j)  “National defense” means programs for military and energy production or construction, military or critical infrastructure assistance to any foreign nation, homeland security, stockpiling, space, and any directly related activity.  Such term includes emergency preparedness activities conducted pursuant to title VI of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5195 et seq., and critical infrastructure protection and restoration.
(k)  “Offsets” means compensation practices required as a condition of purchase in either government to government or commercial sales of defense articles and/or defense services as defined by the Arms Export Control Act, 22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq., and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, 22 C.F.R. 120.1 130.17.
[so the elite get their $700.00 steaks, imported beers and wines ect…] (l)  “Special priorities assistance” means action by resource departments to assist with expediting deliveries, placing rated orders, locating suppliers, resolving production or delivery conflicts between various rated orders, addressing problems that arise in the fulfillment of a rated order or other action authorized by a delegated agency, and determining the validity of rated orders.
(m)  “Strategic and critical materials” means materials (including energy) that (1) would be needed to supply the military, industrial, and essential civilian needs of the United States during a national emergency, and (2) are not found or produced in the United States in sufficient quantities to meet such need and are vulnerable to the termination or reduction of the availability of the material.
(n)  “Water resources” means all usable water, from all sources, within the jurisdiction of the United States, that can be managed, controlled, and allocated to meet emergency requirements, except “water resources” does not include usable water that qualifies as “food resources.”
Sec. 802General.  (a)  Except as otherwise provided in section 802(c) of this order, the authorities vested in the President by title VII of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2151 et seq., are delegated to the head of each agency in carrying out the delegated authorities under the Act and this order, by the Secretary of Labor in carrying out part VI of this order, and by the Secretary of the Treasury in exercising the functions assigned in Executive Order 11858, as amended.
(b)  The authorities that may be exercised and performed pursuant to section 802(a) of this order shall include:

(1)  the power to redelegate authorities, and to authorize the successive redelegation of authorities to agencies, officers, and employees of the Government; and

(2)  the power of subpoena under section 705 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2155, with respect to (i) authorities delegated in parts II, III, and section 702 of this order, and (ii) the functions assigned to the Secretary of the Treasury in Executive Order 11858, as amended, provided that the subpoena power referenced in subsections (i) and (ii) shall be utilized only after the scope and purpose of the investigation, inspection, or inquiry to which the subpoena relates have been defined either by the appropriate officer identified in section 802(a) of this order or by such other person or persons as the officer shall designate.

(c)  Excluded from the authorities delegated by section 802(a) of this order are authorities delegated by parts IV and V of this order, authorities in section 721 and 722 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2170 2171, and the authority with respect to fixing compensation under section 703 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2153.
Sec. 803Authority.  (a)  Executive Order 12919 of June 3, 1994, and sections 401(3) (4) of Executive Order 12656 of November 18, 1988, are revoked.  All other previously issued orders, regulations, rulings, certificates, directives, and other actions relating to any function affected by this order shall remain in effect except as they are inconsistent with this order or are subsequently amended or revoked under proper authority.  Nothing in this order shall affect the validity or force of anything done under previous delegations or other assignment of authority under the Act.
(b)  Nothing in this order shall affect the authorities assigned under Executive Order 11858 of May 7, 1975, as amended, except as provided in section 802 of this order.
(c)  Nothing in this order shall affect the authorities assigned under Executive Order 12472 of April 3, 1984, as amended.
Sec. 804General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect functions of the Director of OMB relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

BARACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE,
March 16, 2012

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The Wandafay Daily is out! Homeland Security Working Overtime to Add ‘New Americans’ by 2016 Election


The Wandafay Daily
Published by
Wandafay
25 April 2015
thumbnail

pjmedia­.com – President Obama’s amnesty by edict has always been about adding new Democrats to the voter rolls, and recent action by the Department of Homeland Security provides further proof. Sources at the Dep…

MORE: http://pjmedia.com/jchristianadams/2015/04/23/homeland-security-working-overtime-to-add-new-americans-by-2016-election/

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

Read paper →
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The new government’s greatest tasks by Caroline Glick


The new government’s greatest tasks by Caroline Glick

Posted: 24 Apr 2015 02:42 AM PDT

…The world has changed since 2009. America has changed. The Middle East has changed. Israel faces an array of challenges and threats it has never faced before. The next government must understand the dynamics of the situation and quickly forge policies based on the world as it is, not as it was or as we would like for it to be.

The%2Bnew%2Bgovernment%E2%80%99s%2Bgreatest%2Btasks%2Bby%2BCaroline%2BGlick.jpg
Caroline Glick..
CarolineGlick.com..
24 April ’15..

In testimony last week before the House committee in charge of State Department funding, US Ambassador to the UN Samantha Power acknowledged that the Obama administration intends to abandon the US’s 50 year policy of supporting Israel at the United Nations.

After going through the tired motions of pledging support for Israel, “when it matters,” Power refused to rule out the possibility that the US would support anti-Israel resolutions in the UN Security Council to limit Israeli sovereignty and control to the lands within the 1949 armistice lines – lines that are indefensible.

Such a move will be taken, she indicated, in order to midwife the establishment of a terrorist-supporting Palestinian state whose supposedly moderate leadership does not recognize Israel’s right to exist, calls daily for its destruction, and uses the UN to delegitimize the Jewish state.

In other words, the Obama administration intends to pin Israel into indefensible borders while establishing a state committed to its destruction.

In about a week, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s new government will be sworn in. The new government will have no grace period before it will be called upon to forge and implement policies to lead Israel through perhaps the most trying time in its history.

Clearly, developing the means to cope with our deteriorating relations with the US is one of the most urgent issues on the agenda. But it is not the only issue requiring the attention of our leaders.

Israel must quickly determine clear strategies for contending with the consequence of US’s strategic shift away from its allies: Iran’s nuclear project. It must also determine the principles that will guide its moves in contending with the regional instability engulfing or threatening to engulf our Arab neighbors.

As tempting as it may be to believe that all we need to do is wait out Obama, the fact is that we have no way of knowing how the US will behave once he has left office.

The Democratic Party has become far more radical under Obama’s leadership than it was before he came into office. Hillary Clinton may very well become the next president, particularly if Jeb Bush is the Republican nominee. And she has evinced no significant interest in moving the party back to the center.

As secretary of state during Obama’s first term in office, Clinton was a full partner in his foreign policy. Although she appears less ideologically driven than Obama, there are many indications that her basic world view is the same as his.

Moreover, the world has changed since 2009. The Middle East is far more volatile and lethal. The US military is far less capable than it was before Obama slashed its budgets, removed its most successful commanders and subjected its troops to morale-destroying mantras of diversity and apologetics for Islamic terrorism.

In light of these changed circumstances, there are in essence two major principles that should guide our leaders today. First, we need to reduce our strategic dependence on the US. Second, we need to expand our policy of openly and unapologetically making the case for our positions to the American public.

On the first score, the need to limit our dependence on US security guarantees became painfully obvious during Operation Protective Edge last summer.

Obama’s interference in military-to-military cooperation between the Defense Ministry and the Pentagon, and his decision to implement an unofficial arms embargo on Israel in the middle of a war, was a shocking rebuke to the powerful voices inside the IDF General Staff and in policy circles that Israel can and must continue to trust the US to back it up in crises.

Our need to limit our dependence on the US to the greatest practicable degree will have consequences on everything from our domestic military production and development industries to intelligence and operational cooperation with the US and other governments.

It is imperative as well that we develop a plan to wean ourselves off of US military aid within the next three-five years.

Netanyahu’s critics continue to attack him for his decision to abandon the longstanding policy of settling disputes with the US administration through quiet diplomacy. They blame Netanyahu’s decision to publicly air Israel’s opposition to Obama’s nuclear diplomacy for the crisis in relations. But they are confusing cause and effect. Netanyahu had no choice.

Obama has made clear through both word and deed that he is completely committed to a policy of reaching a détente with Iran by enabling Iran to join the nuclear club. He will not voluntarily abandon this policy, which his closest aides have acknowledged is the signature policy of his second term.

Under these circumstances, it has long been clear that quiet diplomacy gets Israel nowhere. Open confrontation with the administration is the only way that Israel can hope to limit the damage the administration’s policies can cause. By publicly laying out its positions on issues in dispute, Israel can provide administration critics with legitimacy and maneuver room in their own critiques of Obama’s policies.

The public debate in the US regarding Obama’s policy of appeasing Iran was transformed by Netanyahu’s speech before the joint houses of Congress last month. Before he came to town, most of the voices in the US warning against Obama’s nuclear diplomacy were dismissed as alarmist. Netanyahu’s speech changed the discourse in the US in a fundamental way. Today, Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran is highly controversial and unpopular.

And this brings us to the second burning issue the next government will need to contend with immediately upon entering office: Iran.

Since word of Iran’s nuclear weapons program got out more than a decade ago, Israel has operated under the assumption that a sufficient number of members of the policy community in Washington were committed to a policy of preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons to make the abandonment of that policy politically impossible. Netanyahu’s strategy for dealing with Iran’s nuclear program has centered on convincing those policy-makers to take action, whether through sanctions on Iran or through other means that would make it impossible for Obama to conclude a deal with Iran that would give the nuclear program an American seal of approval.

In recent weeks, we have seen the collapse of that assumption. The Senate’s feckless handling of Obama’s nuclear accommodation of the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism exposed Israel’s operating assumption as overly optimistic. So the policy must be updated.

An updated policy must be based on two understandings. First, the US will not stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

Second, due to Obama’s commitment to nuclear accommodation of Iran, at this point unless Iran’s nuclear installations are destroyed through military force, it will become a nuclear power. Israel’s survival will be compromised and a nuclear arms race throughout the region will ensue.

Given this reality, Israel’s public diplomacy should no longer be viewed as a means to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power. Rather, Israel should view it as a means to empower American lawmakers and others to stand with Israel in the event that it carries out military strikes against Iran’s nuclear weapons.

Open support for Israel by the US public and by politicians and media organs will make it more difficult for the administration to harm Israel in retribution for such action.

As for the strike itself, both the operational and diplomatic aspects of a military action must be calculated to make the most of the changing regional dynamics.

Last summer, in fighting Hamas in Gaza, Israel found itself acting in alliance with Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and the United Arab Emirates against Hamas, Qatar, Turkey and the US. The Arab states served as Israel’s blocking backs. They enabled Israel to withstand massive pressure from the administration that sought to coerce Israel into ending the fighting on Hamas’s terms.

In recent weeks, the media in Egypt and Saudi Arabia have expressed support for an Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear installations. This support will be helpful in the aftermath of any such strike as well, and will again make it difficult for Obama to take revenge on Israel. Moreover, Israel must capitalize on these states’ opposition to Iran’s nuclear weapons program in order to convince them to provide operational support for Israeli forces attacking Iran.

This of course brings us to the third major issue on the next government’s agenda: formulating principles to govern our relations with the Arab world.

One thing is obvious. The goal that informed all previous governments in the past – that Israel’s top goal should be to sign peace deals with our neighbors – is irrelevant.
Our neighbors are all engulfed in wars or crises spurred by domestic opponents. These opponents have embraced al-Qaida and Islamic State and consequently, their domestic disputes with their leaders have been transformed into existential struggles between Islamic totalitarianism and regular authoritarianism.

Israel’s policy to date for handling these affairs has been to support the Egyptian military government and the Jordanians and to prevent Iranian proxies in Syria from directly attacking Israel. This policy is correct and should remain in place. But Israel also needs to adopt policies that will enable it to protect itself in the absence of friendly regimes in Amman and Cairo.

To this end, Israel must stabilize the situation with the Palestinians in Judea and Samaria. Israel must ensure that it has complete military control over these areas to prevent a spillover from Syria and to withstand the effect of a potential rise of jihadist forces in Jordan. As for Gaza, Israel must stop viewing Gaza, which behaves as a separate body politic from Judea and Samaria, as related to Judea and Samaria.

Gaza is a base for the global jihad and is a threat to Israel and Egypt alike. It has to be understood and treated as such.

In short, under the current circumstances, just as the notion of sitting down and signing a peace deal with Syria or Saudi Arabia is absurd, so the notion of reaching a peace deal with the Palestinians is a throwback to an entirely different time. Today the only way to keep the Palestinians of Judea and Samaria separated from the chaos and jihad in neighboring states is to make them part of Israel. As a preparatory step toward that goal, the next government must act to more fully integrate Arab Israelis into Israeli society.

To this end, Netanyahu would do well to appoint a Muslim Arab minister to his government charged with integrating the Arabs more fully into Israeli society.

The world has changed since 2009. America has changed. The Middle East has changed. Israel faces an array of challenges and threats it has never faced before. The next government must understand the dynamics of the situation and quickly forge policies based on the world as it is, not as it was or as we would like for it to be.

Link: http://carolineglick.com/the-new-governments-greatest-tasks/

Originally published in The Jerusalem Post.
Updates throughout the day at http://calevbenyefuneh.blogspot.com.

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The Jewish State, Independence and Self-Defense


The Jewish State, Independence and Self-Defense

Posted: 23 Apr 2015 11:24 PM PDT

http://thisongoingwar.blogspot.co.il/

…No, we arent a protectorate. Not yet. But to paraphrase Benjamin Franklin, the founders of the State of Israel gave us independence if we can keep it.
The%2BJewish%2BState%2C%2BIndependence%2Band%2BSelf-Defense.jpg
Vic Rosenthal..
Abu Yehuda..
24 April ’15..
http://abuyehuda.com/2015/04/independence-and-self-defense/

Today (Thursday) is יום העצמאות, Independence Day, and Im reading lots of articles about the significance of an independent Jewish state. The meaning of independence in my view is, first of all, the ability to defend yourself, said PM Netanyahu. On the other hand, left-wing journalist Nehemia Shtrasler doesnt think that Israel is independent at all. We are no more than an American protectorate, he argues, because the US could stop selling us weapons and take steps to wreck our economy.

Shtrasler is wrong, because the fact that the US could destroy any country in the world if it cared to doesnt mean that there are no independent countries. But he is correct that we are far too dependent on the US, something which is being made clear today as we face an unfriendly arguably, even antisemitic administration in Washington.

Netanyahu is right that independence requires the capability of self-defense, but of course that is only a necessary condition, not a sufficient one. It is also necessary to have the will to use your capabilities, which in turn depends on the conviction that you are morally justified in doing what is necessary to defend yourself.

This is precisely what is being attacked when Israel is delegitimized and demonized by anti-Zionist groups, NGOs and media. They say that Israel stole its land from the rightful Palestinian owners, and that it has neither the legal or moral right to possess it. We are told that Israels birth was facilitated by the commission of crimes against humanity, that Israel has continued to commit war crimes in its wars, which are portrayed as offensive and genocidal instead of defensive. Recently, even the pretense that it is only Israels presence in the territories that is illegitimate is being abandoned. Every inch of our country is contested.

The so-called Palestinian narrative is an example of the Big Lie technique, in which facts and history are inverted and the inversions repeated so often that they become conventional wisdom. Inversion is a good word, because it really does turn the truth upside down. In fact, it was Arabs who perpetrated ethnic cleansing and massacres during Israels war of Independence, and it is the Jewish people who are truly indigenous to the land of Israel. It is the Palestinians who wish to establish an apartheid state, and it is they who target noncombatants and particularly children.

Unfortunately these big lies are effective, even especially in Israel, where one would expect that the truth would be more likely to prevail. The myths have become deeply ingrained, even in some of our politicians, even if they dont realize that they are touched by them.

Self-defense sometimes means deterrence, but sometimes it means war. A political leader or officer in time of war must be able to justify extraordinary actions, actions that he knows will kill people. Some of them will be innocent noncombatants, no matter how careful an army is and how restrictive the rules of engagement and Israel is very, very careful. Some of them will be our own children, husbands or fathers. Can someone who doesnt truly believe that his cause is just take such actions?

Confidence in ones moral and legal position is also required in less lethal pursuits, like diplomacy. Consider the negotiations with the PLO. As I think Ive written before, the idea of land swaps for settlement blocs implies that the land across the Green Line belongs to the Arabs. But anyone who knows the history knows that the Palestine Mandate was intended to provide a national home for the Jewish people, and that the Green Line was agreed by both sides to be nothing more than an armistice line with no political significance. So how did we get the idea that it separates Israel from Arab land?

One of the things that distinguishes a protectorate or satellite from an independent nation is that an independent nation has an independent foreign policy and doesnt simply parrot the party line of its patron. I think this is a good starting point for improving relations with the US: we should try to educate the administration, to the extent that it is possible, about the true legal and historical facts about the State of Israel.

In effect, we need to make a diplomatic declaration of independence from the US. Such a declaration would be an important step in reducing our overall dependence on it and also in improving our ability to defend ourselves. Of course, in order to do this we will need to educate ourselves first, to extirpate the crippling guilt complex that our enemies have succeeded in creating.

One concrete step would be to officially adopt the Levy Commission Report of 2012. The commission, headed by retired Supreme Court Justice Edmond Levy, examined the legal status of the Israeli presence in the territories and concluded that according to international law, Israel is not an occupying power, and the 4th Geneva Convention the usual basis for the argument that settlements are illegal does not apply. The government took no action on the report. It should.

PM Netanyahus statement that there would be no two-state solution in the near future was a breath of fresh air, despite the fact that Obama seized upon it as an excuse to distance the US from Israel. The interminable pointless negotiations with the PLO/PA only served to provide leverage to extract concessions from Israel without any promise of reaching an agreement. As for Obamas reaction, if Netanyahu hadnt said it, he would have found another excuse to do what he was determined to do.

There are other things that we can do to increase our independence and improve our ability to defend ourselves. We should try as much as possible to develop our own weapons systems and to integrate systems from other suppliers than the US, so that it would be harder for an unfriendly US administration to cut us off without recourse. We should develop trade with India and the Far East to help offset the damage that a European boycott could cause. But most important, we should remind ourselves of who and what we are, while rejecting the invidious descriptions provided by our enemies.

No, we arent a protectorate. Not yet. But to paraphrase Benjamin Franklin, the founders of the State of Israel gave us independence if we can keep it.

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

OMINOUS FLASHBACK: Remember When Bill Ayers Said THIS?


After seeing what is going on right now in the world, do you believe the “master plan” is coming together?

Bill Ayers Portraits

Published on April 24th, 2015 | by Allen West Republic

As Reported in 2012 By The Blaze:

Bill Ayers spoke at the University of Oregon last week on the subject of teaching and organizing for “social justice.” His speech was not free of the radical sentiments he is well-known for espousing (especially in the company of America’s youth). Case in point: he spoke of the end of America, a new world, and what our role ought to be in all of it.

Almost as interesting as Ayers’ speech itself, perhaps, was how the leftist radical was introduced by the university students. One girl, who described herself as a doctoral student at the university, spoke of the privilege they would have with their honored guest, in an “evening [of] radical imagination.”

Two others, an associate professor at the university and a graduate student, remarked: “Most of us have in one way or another acknowledged the sovereign authority of the U.S. government– or the state of Oregon– in order to be here tonight, either admission to the university, applying for a job, or just paying the parking meter. We have not, however, asked permission of the [Native Americans] whose ancestral home this is, and to fail to acknowledge that this remains disputed territory would in effect be taking sides, [and] reinforce the erasure of indigenous history and indigenous peoples.”

When Ayers spoke, it was largely of how the “American Empire” is over, and what this means for her citizens (though there was a fair amount of “the wasteful American” theme throughout as well):

The great challenge for our generation [is] to find a way not just to live differently as individuals, but to find a way to think differently about what work means, to think differently about citizenship means, to think differently about what it means to be a ‘citizen of the world.’  One of the great dangers that we live in right now, is I don’t think there’s any question, and I don’t think any of you would question, that the American Empire is in decline–that economically, and politically, and in  some ways culturally, that we are in decline.  And yet, the United States remains the most powerful, weaponized military system the Earth has ever known.

That’s a treacherous combination.  A declining economic power, and an expanding military power.  And we are going to have to find ways to re-imagine what it means to live in this country–in this world.  And here we are 4% of the world’s population, 4.5% of the world’s population, consuming vast amounts of natural resources, consuming vast amounts of finished goods, and no politician will say that the empire is declining and that the game is over. 

COMPLETE THE ENTIRE ARTICLE FROM 2012 HERE: http://allenwestrepublic.com/2015/04/24/ominous-flashback-remember-when-bill-ayers-said-this/

Bill Ayers to University Students: America’s ‘Game Is Over’ and ‘Another World’ Is Coming | Video | TheBlaze.com.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

BOOM! Allen West Goes After Muslim Student Association Cancelling American Sniper



West addresses the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington

 

by Allen West

It is the highest grossing war movie in U.S. history but — as we’ve reported previously — it is in the target sights of Muslim students. Once again, a showing of “American Sniper” has been cancelled, this time at the University of Maryland, College Park.

As reported by Foxnews.com, “The University of Maryland announced it will postpone indefinitely an upcoming screening of “American Sniper” after Muslim students protested – calling the film Islamophobic, racist and nationalistic.

“American Sniper only perpetuates the spread of Islamophobia and is offensive to many Muslims around the world for good reason,” read a petition launched by the university’s Muslim Students Association. “This movie dehumanizes Muslim individuals, promotes the idea of senseless mass murder, and portrays negative and inaccurate stereotypes.”

“The critically-acclaimed film about the life of Navy SEAL Chris Kyle was supposed to be screened May 6 and 7. It was “postponed” on April 22 by the university’s Student Entertainment Events (SEE). While SEE did not mention the Muslim Students Association’s petition, they referenced a meeting with “concerned student organizations” about the film. “SEE is choosing to explore the proactive measures of working with others during the coming months to possibly create an event where students can engage in constructive and moderated dialogues about the controversial topics proposed in the film,” read a statement from SEE posted on the university’s website. The Muslim Students Association posted a Facebook message praising the university’s capitulation to their demands.”

CONTINUE THE FULL STORY HERE BY ALLEN WEST: http://allenwestrepublic.com/2015/04/24/boom-allen-west-goes-after-muslim-student-association-cancelling-american-sniper/

INCOMING: Here’s my message to the Muslim Students Association canceling American Sniper – Allen B. West – AllenBWest.com.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal


Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid

Russian Uranium Deal

By JO BECKER and MIKE McINTIREAPRIL 23, 2015

A Uranium One sign that points to a 35,000-acre ranch owned by John Christensen, near the town of Gillette, Wyo. Uranium One has the mining rights to Mr. Christensen’s property.
Credit Matthew Staver for The New York Times

The headline on the website Pravda trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup, its nationalistic fervor recalling an era when its precursor served as the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin: “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.”

The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Frank Giustra, right, a mining financier, has donated $31.3 million to the foundation run by former President Bill Clinton, left. Credit Joaquin Sarmiento/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

At the time, both Rosatom and the United States government made promises intended to ease concerns about ceding control of the company’s assets to the Russians. Those promises have been repeatedly broken, records show.

The New York Times’s examination of the Uranium One deal is based on dozens of interviews, as well as a review of public records and securities filings in Canada, Russia and the United States. Some of the connections between Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation were unearthed by Peter Schweizer, a former fellow at the right-leaning Hoover Institution and author of the forthcoming book “Clinton Cash.” Mr. Schweizer provided a preview of material in the book to The Times, which scrutinized his information and built upon it with its own reporting.

Whether the donations played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown. But the episode underscores the special ethical challenges presented by the Clinton Foundation, headed by a former president who relied heavily on foreign cash to accumulate $250 million in assets even as his wife helped steer American foreign policy as secretary of state, presiding over decisions with the potential to benefit the foundation’s donors.

In a statement, Brian Fallon, a spokesman for Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign, said no one “has ever produced a shred of evidence supporting the theory that Hillary Clinton ever took action as secretary of state to support the interests of donors to the Clinton Foundation.” He emphasized that multiple United States agencies, as well as the Canadian government, had signed off on the deal and that, in general, such matters were handled at a level below the secretary. “To suggest the State Department, under then-Secretary Clinton, exerted undue influence in the U.S. government’s review of the sale of Uranium One is utterly baseless,” he added.

American political campaigns are barred from accepting foreign donations. But foreigners may give to foundations in the United States. In the days since Mrs. Clinton announced her candidacy for president, the Clinton Foundation has announced changes meant to quell longstanding concerns about potential conflicts of interest in such donations; it has limited donations from foreign governments, with many, like Russia’s, barred from giving to all but its health care initiatives. That policy stops short of Mrs. Clinton’s agreement with the Obama administration, which prohibited all foreign government donations while she served as the nation’s top diplomat.

Donations to the Clinton Foundation, and a Russian Uranium Takeover

Uranium investors gave millions to the Clinton Foundation while Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s office was involved in approving a Russian bid for mining assets in Kazakhstan and the United States.

clinton-foundation-donations-uranium-investors-1429749669022-master495-v3.png

Either way, the Uranium One deal highlights the limits of such prohibitions. The foundation will continue to accept contributions from foreign sources whose interests, like Uranium One’s, may overlap with those of foreign governments, some of which may be at odds with the United States.

When the Uranium One deal was approved, the geopolitical backdrop was far different from today’s. The Obama administration was seeking to “reset” strained relations with Russia. The deal was strategically important to Mr. Putin, who shortly after the Americans gave their blessing sat down for a staged interview with Rosatom’s chief executive, Sergei Kiriyenko. “Few could have imagined in the past that we would own 20 percent of U.S. reserves,” Mr. Kiriyenko told Mr. Putin.

Now, after Russia’s annexation of Crimea and aggression in Ukraine, the Moscow-Washington relationship is devolving toward Cold War levels, a point several experts made in evaluating a deal so beneficial to Mr. Putin, a man known to use energy resources to project power around the world.

“Should we be concerned? Absolutely,” said Michael McFaul, who served under Mrs. Clinton as the American ambassador to Russia but said he had been unaware of the Uranium One deal until asked about it. “Do we want Putin to have a monopoly on this? Of course we don’t. We don’t want to be dependent on Putin for anything in this climate.”

A Seat at the Table

The path to a Russian acquisition of American uranium deposits began in 2005 in Kazakhstan, where the Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra orchestrated his first big uranium deal, with Mr. Clinton at his side.

The two men had flown aboard Mr. Giustra’s private jet to Almaty, Kazakhstan, where they dined with the authoritarian president, Nursultan A. Nazarbayev. Mr. Clinton handed the Kazakh president a propaganda coup when he expressed support for Mr. Nazarbayev’s bid to head an international elections monitoring group, undercutting American foreign policy and criticism of Kazakhstan’s poor human rights record by, among others, his wife, then a senator.

Within days of the visit, Mr. Giustra’s fledgling company, UrAsia Energy Ltd., signed a preliminary deal giving it stakes in three uranium mines controlled by the state-run uranium agency Kazatomprom.

Photo

Ian Telfer was chairman of Uranium One and made large donations to the Clinton Foundation. Credit Galit Rodan/Bloomberg, via Getty Images

If the Kazakh deal was a major victory, UrAsia did not wait long before resuming the hunt. In 2007, it merged with Uranium One, a South African company with assets in Africa and Australia, in what was described as a $3.5 billion transaction. The new company, which kept the Uranium One name, was controlled by UrAsia investors including Ian Telfer, a Canadian who became chairman. Through a spokeswoman, Mr. Giustra, whose personal stake in the deal was estimated at about $45 million, said he sold his stake in 2007.

Soon, Uranium One began to snap up companies with assets in the United States. In April 2007, it announced the purchase of a uranium mill in Utah and more than 38,000 acres of uranium exploration properties in four Western states, followed quickly by the acquisition of the Energy Metals Corporation and its uranium holdings in Wyoming, Texas and Utah. That deal made clear that Uranium One was intent on becoming “a powerhouse in the United States uranium sector with the potential to become the domestic supplier of choice for U.S. utilities,” the company declared.

Still, the company’s story was hardly front-page news in the United States — until early 2008, in the midst of Mrs. Clinton’s failed presidential campaign, when The Times published an article revealing the 2005 trip’s link to Mr. Giustra’s Kazakhstan mining deal. It also reported that several months later, Mr. Giustra had donated $31.3 million to Mr. Clinton’s foundation.

(In a statement issued after this article appeared online, Mr. Giustra said he was “extremely proud” of his charitable work with Mr. Clinton, and he urged the media to focus on poverty, health care and “the real challenges of the world.”)

Though the 2008 article quoted the former head of Kazatomprom, Moukhtar Dzhakishev, as saying that the deal required government approval and was discussed at a dinner with the president, Mr. Giustra insisted that it was a private transaction, with no need for Mr. Clinton’s influence with Kazakh officials. He described his relationship with Mr. Clinton as motivated solely by a shared interest in philanthropy.

As if to underscore the point, five months later Mr. Giustra held a fund-raiser for the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative, a project aimed at fostering progressive environmental and labor practices in the natural resources industry, to which he had pledged $100 million. The star-studded gala, at a conference center in Toronto, featured performances by Elton John and Shakira and celebrities like Tom Cruise, John Travolta and Robin Williams encouraging contributions from the many so-called F.O.F.s — Friends of Frank — in attendance, among them Mr. Telfer. In all, the evening generated $16 million in pledges, according to an article in The Globe and Mail.

“None of this would have been possible if Frank Giustra didn’t have a remarkable combination of caring and modesty, of vision and energy and iron determination,” Mr. Clinton told those gathered, adding: “I love this guy, and you should, too.”

But what had been a string of successes was about to hit a speed bump.

Bill Clinton met with Vladimir V. Putin in Moscow in 2010. Credit Mikhail Metzel/Associated Press

Arrest and Progress

By June 2009, a little over a year after the star-studded evening in Toronto, Uranium One’s stock was in free-fall, down 40 percent. Mr. Dzhakishev, the head of Kazatomprom, had just been arrested on charges that he illegally sold uranium deposits to foreign companies, including at least some of those won by Mr. Giustra’s UrAsia and now owned by Uranium One.

Publicly, the company tried to reassure shareholders. Its chief executive, Jean Nortier, issued a confident statement calling the situation a “complete misunderstanding.” He also contradicted Mr. Giustra’s contention that the uranium deal had not required government blessing. “When you do a transaction in Kazakhstan, you need the government’s approval,” he said, adding that UrAsia had indeed received that approval.

But privately, Uranium One officials were worried they could lose their joint mining ventures. American diplomatic cables made public by WikiLeaks also reflect concerns that Mr. Dzhakishev’s arrest was part of a Russian power play for control of Kazakh uranium assets.

At the time, Russia was already eying a stake in Uranium One, Rosatom company documents show. Rosatom officials say they were seeking to acquire mines around the world because Russia lacks sufficient domestic reserves to meet its own industry needs.

It was against this backdrop that the Vancouver-based Uranium One pressed the American Embassy in Kazakhstan, as well as Canadian diplomats, to take up its cause with Kazakh officials, according to the American cables.

“We want more than a statement to the press,” Paul Clarke, a Uranium One executive vice president, told the embassy’s energy officer on June 10, the officer reported in a cable. “That is simply chitchat.” What the company needed, Mr. Clarke said, was official written confirmation that the licenses were valid.

The American Embassy ultimately reported to the secretary of state, Mrs. Clinton. Though the Clarke cable was copied to her, it was given wide circulation, and it is unclear if she would have read it; the Clinton campaign did not address questions about the cable.

What is clear is that the embassy acted, with the cables showing that the energy officer met with Kazakh officials to discuss the issue on June 10 and 11.

Three days later, a wholly owned subsidiary of Rosatom completed a deal for 17 percent of Uranium One. And within a year, the Russian government substantially upped the ante, with a generous offer to shareholders that would give it a 51 percent controlling stake. But first, Uranium One had to get the American government to sign off on the deal.

The Power to Say No

When a company controlled by the Chinese government sought a 51 percent stake in a tiny Nevada gold mining operation in 2009, it set off a secretive review process in Washington, where officials raised concerns primarily about the mine’s proximity to a military installation, but also about the potential for minerals at the site, including uranium, to come under Chinese control. The officials killed the deal.

Such is the power of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. The committee comprises some of the most powerful members of the cabinet, including the attorney general, the secretaries of the Treasury, Defense, Homeland Security, Commerce and Energy, and the secretary of state. They are charged with reviewing any deal that could result in foreign control of an American business or asset deemed important to national security.

The national security issue at stake in the Uranium One deal was not primarily about nuclear weapons proliferation; the United States and Russia had for years cooperated on that front, with Russia sending enriched fuel from decommissioned warheads to be used in American nuclear power plants in return for raw uranium.

Instead, it concerned American dependence on foreign uranium sources. While the United States gets one-fifth of its electrical power from nuclear plants, it produces only around 20 percent of the uranium it needs, and most plants have only 18 to 36 months of reserves, according to Marin Katusa, author of “The Colder War: How the Global Energy Trade Slipped From America’s Grasp.”

“The Russians are easily winning the uranium war, and nobody’s talking about it,” said Mr. Katusa, who explores the implications of the Uranium One deal in his book. “It’s not just a domestic issue but a foreign policy issue, too.”

President Putin during a meeting with Rosatom’s chief executive, Sergei Kiriyenko, in December 2007. Credit Dmitry Astakhov/Ria Novosti, via Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

When ARMZ, an arm of Rosatom, took its first 17 percent stake in Uranium One in 2009, the two parties signed an agreement, found in securities filings, to seek the foreign investment committee’s review. But it was the 2010 deal, giving the Russians a controlling 51 percent stake, that set off alarm bells. Four members of the House of Representatives signed a letter expressing concern. Two more began pushing legislation to kill the deal.

Senator John Barrasso, a Republican from Wyoming, where Uranium One’s largest American operation was, wrote to President Obama, saying the deal “would give the Russian government control over a sizable portion of America’s uranium production capacity.”

“Equally alarming,” Mr. Barrasso added, “this sale gives ARMZ a significant stake in uranium mines in Kazakhstan.”

Uranium One’s shareholders were also alarmed, and were “afraid of Rosatom as a Russian state giant,” Sergei Novikov, a company spokesman, recalled in an interview. He said Rosatom’s chief, Mr. Kiriyenko, sought to reassure Uranium One investors, promising that Rosatom would not break up the company and would keep the same management, including Mr. Telfer, the chairman. Another Rosatom official said publicly that it did not intend to increase its investment beyond 51 percent, and that it envisioned keeping Uranium One a public company

American nuclear officials, too, seemed eager to assuage fears. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission wrote to Mr. Barrasso assuring him that American uranium would be preserved for domestic use, regardless of who owned it.

“In order to export uranium from the United States, Uranium One Inc. or ARMZ would need to apply for and obtain a specific NRC license authorizing the export of uranium for use as reactor fuel,” the letter said.

Still, the ultimate authority to approve or reject the Russian acquisition rested with the cabinet officials on the foreign investment committee, including Mrs. Clinton — whose husband was collecting millions in donations from people associated with Uranium One.

Undisclosed Donations

Photo

Uranium One’s Russian takeover was approved by the United States while Hillary Rodham Clinton was secretary of state. Credit Doug Mills/The New York Times

Before Mrs. Clinton could assume her post as secretary of state, the White House demanded that she sign a memorandum of understanding placing limits on the activities of her husband’s foundation. To avoid the perception of conflicts of interest, beyond the ban on foreign government donations, the foundation was required to publicly disclose all contributors.

To judge from those disclosures — which list the contributions in ranges rather than precise amounts — the only Uranium One official to give to the Clinton Foundation was Mr. Telfer, the chairman, and the amount was relatively small: no more than $250,000, and that was in 2007, before talk of a Rosatom deal began percolating.

But a review of tax records in Canada, where Mr. Telfer has a family charity called the Fernwood Foundation, shows that he donated millions of dollars more, during and after the critical time when the foreign investment committee was reviewing his deal with the Russians. With the Russians offering a special dividend, shareholders like Mr. Telfer stood to profit.

His donations through the Fernwood Foundation included $1 million reported in 2009, the year his company appealed to the American Embassy to help it keep its mines in Kazakhstan; $250,000 in 2010, the year the Russians sought majority control; as well as $600,000 in 2011 and $500,000 in 2012. Mr. Telfer said that his donations had nothing to do with his business dealings, and that he had never discussed Uranium One with Mr. or Mrs. Clinton. He said he had given the money because he wanted to support Mr. Giustra’s charitable endeavors with Mr. Clinton. “Frank and I have been friends and business partners for almost 20 years,” he said.

The Clinton campaign left it to the foundation to reply to questions about the Fernwood donations; the foundation did not provide a response.

Mr. Telfer’s undisclosed donations came in addition to between $1.3 million and $5.6 million in contributions, which were reported, from a constellation of people with ties to Uranium One or UrAsia, the company that originally acquired Uranium One’s most valuable asset: the Kazakh mines. Without those assets, the Russians would have had no interest in the deal: “It wasn’t the goal to buy the Wyoming mines. The goal was to acquire the Kazakh assets, which are very good,” Mr. Novikov, the Rosatom spokesman, said in an interview.

Amid this influx of Uranium One-connected money, Mr. Clinton was invited to speak in Moscow in June 2010, the same month Rosatom struck its deal for a majority stake in Uranium One.

The $500,000 fee — among Mr. Clinton’s highest — was paid by Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin that has invited world leaders, including Tony Blair, the former British prime minister, to speak at its investor conferences.

Photo

John Christensen sold the mining rights on his ranch in Wyoming to Uranium One. Credit Matthew Staver for The New York Times

Renaissance Capital analysts talked up Uranium One’s stock, assigning it a “buy” rating and saying in a July 2010 research report that it was “the best play” in the uranium markets. In addition, Renaissance Capital turned up that same year as a major donor, along with Mr. Giustra and several companies linked to Uranium One or UrAsia, to a small medical charity in Colorado run by a friend of Mr. Giustra’s. In a newsletter to supporters, the friend credited Mr. Giustra with helping get donations from “businesses around the world.”

Renaissance Capital would not comment on the genesis of Mr. Clinton’s speech to an audience that included leading Russian officials, or on whether it was connected to the Rosatom deal. According to a Russian government news service, Mr. Putin personally thanked Mr. Clinton for speaking.

A person with knowledge of the Clinton Foundation’s fund-raising operation, who requested anonymity to speak candidly about it, said that for many people, the hope is that money will in fact buy influence: “Why do you think they are doing it — because they love them?” But whether it actually does is another question. And in this case, there were broader geopolitical pressures that likely came into play as the United States considered whether to approve the Rosatom-Uranium One deal.

Diplomatic Considerations

If doing business with Rosatom was good for those in the Uranium One deal, engaging with Russia was also a priority of the incoming Obama administration, which was hoping for a new era of cooperation as Mr. Putin relinquished the presidency — if only for a term — to Dmitri A. Medvedev.

“The assumption was we could engage Russia to further core U.S. national security interests,” said Mr. McFaul, the former ambassador.

It started out well. The two countries made progress on nuclear proliferation issues, and expanded use of Russian territory to resupply American forces in Afghanistan. Keeping Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon was among the United States’ top priorities, and in June 2010 Russia signed off on a United Nations resolution imposing tough new sanctions on that country.

Two months later, the deal giving ARMZ a controlling stake in Uranium One was submitted to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States for review. Because of the secrecy surrounding the process, it is hard to know whether the participants weighed the desire to improve bilateral relations against the potential risks of allowing the Russian government control over the biggest uranium producer in the United States. The deal was ultimately approved in October, following what two people involved in securing the approval said had been a relatively smooth process.

Photo

Moukhtar Dzhakishev was arrested in 2009 while the chief of Kazatomprom. Credit Daniel Acker/Bloomberg, via Getty Images

Not all of the committee’s decisions are personally debated by the agency heads themselves; in less controversial cases, deputy or assistant secretaries may sign off. But experts and former committee members say Russia’s interest in Uranium One and its American uranium reserves seemed to warrant attention at the highest levels.

“This deal had generated press, it had captured the attention of Congress and it was strategically important,” said Richard Russell, who served on the committee during the George W. Bush administration. “When I was there invariably any one of those conditions would cause this to get pushed way up the chain, and here you had all three.”

And Mrs. Clinton brought a reputation for hawkishness to the process; as a senator, she was a vocal critic of the committee’s approval of a deal that would have transferred the management of major American seaports to a company based in the United Arab Emirates, and as a presidential candidate she had advocated legislation to strengthen the process.

The Clinton campaign spokesman, Mr. Fallon, said that in general, these matters did not rise to the secretary’s level. He would not comment on whether Mrs. Clinton had been briefed on the matter, but he gave The Times a statement from the former assistant secretary assigned to the foreign investment committee at the time, Jose Fernandez. While not addressing the specifics of the Uranium One deal, Mr. Fernandez said, “Mrs. Clinton never intervened with me on any C.F.I.U.S. matter.”

Mr. Fallon also noted that if any agency had raised national security concerns about the Uranium One deal, it could have taken them directly to the president.

Anne-Marie Slaughter, the State Department’s director of policy planning at the time, said she was unaware of the transaction — or the extent to which it made Russia a dominant uranium supplier. But speaking generally, she urged caution in evaluating its wisdom in hindsight.

“Russia was not a country we took lightly at the time or thought was cuddly,” she said. “But it wasn’t the adversary it is today.”

That renewed adversarial relationship has raised concerns about European dependency on Russian energy resources, including nuclear fuel. The unease reaches beyond diplomatic circles. In Wyoming, where Uranium One equipment is scattered across his 35,000-acre ranch, John Christensen is frustrated that repeated changes in corporate ownership over the years led to French, South African, Canadian and, finally, Russian control over mining rights on his property.

“I hate to see a foreign government own mining rights here in the United States,” he said. “I don’t think that should happen.”

Mr. Christensen, 65, noted that despite assurances by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that uranium could not leave the country without Uranium One or ARMZ obtaining an export license — which they do not have — yellowcake from his property was routinely packed into drums and trucked off to a processing plant in Canada.

Asked about that, the commission confirmed that Uranium One has, in fact, shipped yellowcake to Canada even though it does not have an export license. Instead, the transport company doing the shipping, RSB Logistic Services, has the license. A commission spokesman said that “to the best of our knowledge” most of the uranium sent to Canada for processing was returned for use in the United States. A Uranium One spokeswoman, Donna Wichers, said 25 percent had gone to Western Europe and Japan. At the moment, with the uranium market in a downturn, nothing is being shipped from the Wyoming mines.

The “no export” assurance given at the time of the Rosatom deal is not the only one that turned out to be less than it seemed. Despite pledges to the contrary, Uranium One was delisted from the Toronto Stock Exchange and taken private. As of 2013, Rosatom’s subsidiary, ARMZ, owned 100 percent of it.

Copyright © 2015 Carl Paladino, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this from Carl Paladino.Our mailing address is:
Carl Paladino295 Main Street
Buffalo, NY 14203

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

open.php?u=0f0270f357b133ac8910c783a&id=207854ab4a&e=2210c0cc7a

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The DNA Deniers in the Media: claiming to be one of any number of categories of alleged sexual minorities can accurately be labeled DNA deniers


By: Cliff Kincaid
Accuracy in Media

The media have launched a major campaign on behalf of the “transgendered.” The Bruce Jenner ABC News interview is the most visible manifestation of this campaign. However, the NBC Nightly News on Wednesday ran a story by Kate Snow about the “transgender grandchild” of Democratic Rep. Mike Honda of Hawaii. Lacking in the coverage is any concrete definition of the term “transgendered” or any discussion of how children are now being used to promote an increasingly bizarre sexual agenda that requires physically mutilating or chemically treating very confused young people.
The Human Rights Campaign, a group co-founded by accused sex offender Terry Bean, a major Democratic Party fundraiser, quickly highlighted this latest NBC News report in a continuing series on “transgender youth.”
However, just like the terms lesbian, gay, and bisexual, the word “transgendered” applies to certain behaviors or appearances and does not signify anything scientific or biological about a person.
More: http://noisyroom.net/blog/2015/04/24/the-dna-deniers-in-the-media/

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

2 Timothy 3:1-4 “But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

9,000 Photographs from 1800’s Palestine / Israel – with no trace of ‘Palestinians’


Originally posted on Palestine-Israel Conflict:

Where ARE all those Palestinians, the proclaimed one million of them who lived in Israel before they were ‘displaced’? Nowhere.

Nowhere, because they never existed. And where are all the mosques for those “over 1 million Palestinians” who are suppose to have lived there already in the early 1800’s like “Palestinians” claim? If they had been 1 million at the turn of the Century, or even in 1920 after they began immigrating to fight the British, with their rapid population growth Palestine would consist of over 40 million people today and not 4 million. That alone proves the jihad lies. Their population is small because they are new invaders and occupiers who arrived late with an aim to commit jihad. They never lost land that was never theirs to begin with!

The British army permitted merely a few Ottomans to remain due to religious observations, the rest was Jewish. In…

View original 529 more words

Posted in Uncategorized

Police kill more whites than blacks, but minority deaths generate more outrage: analysis


Police kill more whites than blacks, but minority deaths generate more outrage: analysis
thumbnail www­.washingtontimes­.com – Nobel Prize-winning novelist Toni Morrison says she wants to see an officer shoot an unarmed white teenager in the back before agreeing that the “conversation about race” is over, but she almost ce…

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

Posted in Uncategorized

Project Veritas: Our Student Journalist Allowed to Graduate!!!


Project Veritas
IMPORTANT UPDATE: Around the time I finished writing this email, there was a new development regarding Laura’s case. Be sure to read the P.S. section at the bottom for the latest update.
It’s been a tough battle, but because of your support, our undercover journalist Laura WILL be allowed to graduate at the same time as the rest of her class this May. If you recall, Laura is the honor student who went undercover at Barry University showing just how far their faculty would go toward establishing a club which would provide material support to the terrorist group ISIS. Following the release of the video, University officials went after Laura instead of their own staff members, unfairly threatening her ability to graduate.

This email confirms that Laura will be allowed to graduate when she has completed the rest of her required coursework and successfully defends her thesis. This couldn’t have happened without you!

When Barry University went after Laura, they suspended her pending an unjust hearing and wouldn’t even allow her on campus. As I informed everyone, this would deny her the ability to finish her required course work, so we hired an attorney to act on her behalf. When I say we hired an attorney, I mean all of us. Without your generous gifts to Project Veritas to pay for Laura’s gifted legal counsel, it’s highly unlikely Laura would have been able to work out her situation with school administrators.

As a matter of fact, Laura’s attorney told us that the university never would have come to their senses without all the pressure YOU applied to Barry with social media, phone calls and emails. Laura and I are at a loss for words because of your incredibly strong show of support. Thanks so much.

Completing her academic requirements shouldn’t be too tough for our 4.0 GPA student who was recently recognized as Barry’s top communication student for her graduating class. Her thesis is so appropriate for the situation, too. The title is The Effect of Media on Political Decision-Making, Attitudes, and Behavior in the U.S.

Because of your financial assistance, not only were we able to support Laura’s legal expenses, but Project Veritas is now able to hire her as a full-time investigative journalist! Just imagine what she will be capable of with your continued financial support.


Because of you – your tweets, your emails, your telephone calls and your critical donations at just the right time — Laura won’t be unjustly punished for exposing the truth on video. We’ve also got to thank all of the supportive members of the conservative media who stepped in on this issue, especially Sean Hannity, who worked with us to launch one of our very successful Twitter campaigns to support Laura.

At Project Veritas, we will continue to expose corruption, duplicity, cronyism and the waste of your tax dollars as our primary mission. Maintaining a full-time staff of investigative journalists, editors, producers and other media staff is an expensive endeavor, though. Fortunately, it’s tax deductible so you can make your money go quite a long way with your donation. At Project Veritas, we pride ourselves in providing some of the best bang-for-the-buck, but we can’t do it without your support.

Thanks for everything you did for Laura!

Best,

James

P.S. DEVELOPING: Laura just texted the office this morning to let us know that she had two flat tires and the passenger side of her car had been keyed. They found a nail in each flattened tire. We instructed her to immediately file a police report. Anyone who would do this to a student is beneath contempt.


P.P.S. I’ve mentioned this before, but this seems an appropriate time to bring it up again: We’d really like to be able to send 100 people like Laura out in the field. Please consider making a tax deductible financial contribution today so we can greatly expand our work.

PROJECT VERITAS IS A 501(C)(3) CONTRIBUTIONS ARE TAX-DEDUCTIBLE.

1214 West Boston Post Road No. 156
Mamaroneck, NY 10543

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

1995 Video: Obama Praises Communist Mentor Frank Marshall Davis


April 15, 2015

1995 Video: Obama Praises Communist Mentor Frank Marshall Davis

4.15.2015
News
Trey Sanchez

Ed Schultz: Hillary Doesn’t Need To Answer Your Stupid Questions

4.14.2015
News
Caleb Howe

DODGE CITY: Watch Megyn Kelly Ask Debbie Wasserman Schultz Rand Paul’s Abortion Question

4.14.2015
News
Caleb Howe

Tapper Mocks Rubio: ‘You’re the Candidate of Yesterday’

4.15.2015
News
Bradford Thomas

Obama Removes Terror-Supporting Cuba from List of Terror Supporters

4.14.2015
News
Peter Malcolm

A PROJECT OF THE DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER

Contact TR Support Copyright 2014, TruthRevolt.org

open.php?u=17c1e1f5483b30d67632292ac&id=c0ba976b95&e=9fe82a295f

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Allen West: Obama Removes Cuba From Terrorists List, Hours Later Cuban Sponsored Terrorists Do This


imp?s=107668&layout=left&t=newsletter&li=allenwestrepublic&e=a12iggymom@hotmail.com&p=1429129984
Logo

Featured Story

FARC
Obama Removes Cuba from Terror List, Hours Later Cuban Sponsored Terrorists Do This
Read this article…

Top Stories

WHOA! Under Obama’s Amnesty They Gave WHAT To Illegals?

Read this article …

imp?s=107675&t=newsletter&sz=1x1&li=allenwestrepublic&e=a12iggymom@hotmail.com&p=1429129984 imp?s=107676&t=newsletter&sz=1x1&li=allenwestrepublic&e=a12iggymom@hotmail.com&p=1429129984

GAO Issues CHILLING New Report For Airline Passengers

Read this article …

The Fundamental Transformation: A Losers Legacy

Read this article …

British fighter jets scramble when Russia did this today…… INTENSE!

Read this article …

imp?s=107669&layout=right&t=newsletter&li=allenwestrepublic&e=a12iggymom@hotmail.com&p=1429129984
imp?s=107670&t=newsletter&sz=1x1&li=allenwestrepublic&e=a12iggymom@hotmail.com&p=1429129984 imp?s=107671&t=newsletter&sz=1x1&li=allenwestrepublic&e=a12iggymom@hotmail.com&p=1429129984
imp?s=107673&t=newsletter&sz=116x15&li=allenwestrepublic&e=a12iggymom@hotmail.com&p=1429129984 imp?s=107672&t=newsletter&sz=19x15&li=allenwestrepublic&e=a12iggymom@hotmail.com&p=1429129984

383466.gif?m=4a010e26c955a4e1e5576dc9e3047436&n=1383466.gif?m=4a010e26c955a4e1e5576dc9e3047436&n=2383466.gif?m=4a010e26c955a4e1e5576dc9e3047436&n=3383466.gif?m=4a010e26c955a4e1e5576dc9e3047436&n=4383466.gif?m=4a010e26c955a4e1e5576dc9e3047436&n=5

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Guess Who Inspired an Antisemitic ‘Documentary’ That Says Jews Have Been ‘Mastermind’ For Over 3,500 Years?


Guess Who Inspired an Antisemitic ‘Documentary’ That Says Jews Have Been ‘Mastermind’ For Over 3,500 Years?

Posted: 14 Apr 2015 10:41 PM PDT

…Erdogan’s December 12, 2014 speech, which focused on this “mastermind” concept, inspired the production of a two-hour “documentary” by one of the leading Turkish television channels, the pro-AKP A Haber. The film, titled “The Mastermind,” first aired on March 15, 2015 and has been broadcast repeatedly since then; in addition, the Turkish Islamist pro-AKP media are circulating the film on their own websites…According to this film, Jewish “domination of the world” goes back 3,500 years, to the days of Moses….The following is an overview of the film

Inspired%2Ban%2BAntisemitic%2B'Documentary'%2BThat%2BSays%2BJews%2BHave%2BBeen%2B'Mastermind'%2BFor%2BOver%2B3%2C500%2BYears.jpg
MEMRI..
Special Dispatch No.6021..
14 April ’15..

Since October 2014, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has regularly referred to the concept of a “Mastermind” (ust akil, “supra-intellect,” in Turkish) that, he says, is plotting against Turkey. This concept has been applauded by the Islamist pro-AKP media. Erdogan’s December 12, 2014 speech, which focused on this “mastermind” concept, inspired the production of a two-hour “documentary” by one of the leading Turkish television channels, the pro-AKP A Haber. The film, titled “The Mastermind,” first aired on March 15, 2015 and has been broadcast repeatedly since then; in addition, the Turkish Islamist pro-AKP media are circulating the film on their own websites.
According to this film, Jewish “domination of the world” goes back 3,500 years, to the days of Moses. The film presents three Jewish historical figures who, it claims, shaped the Jews’ hunger for power: the medieval Spanish philosopher and Torah scholar Moses Maimonides, Charles Darwin (who was not in fact a Jew), and German-American philosopher Leo Strauss.
The following is an overview of the film:

Who%2BInspired%2Ban%2BAntisemitic%2B'Documentary'%2BThat%2BSays%2BJews%2BHave%2BBeen%2B'Mastermind'%2BFor%2BOver%2B3%2C500%2BYears.jpg
Source: , accessed April 13, 2015

Erdogan: The Mastermind – “You Know Who It Is”

“The Mastermind” opens with images of the Star of David, and images of a replica of the Temple in Jerusalem, and then an excerpt of President Erdogan’s December 12, 2014 speech is shown, with him saying: “I am emphasizing this: Do not think that these are operations[1] that target me personally. Do not think that these operations are against our government or any [political] party. My friends, the target of these operations and initiatives is Turkey, Turkey’s existence, her unity, peace, and stability. They are especially against Turkey’s economy and its independence. As I have said before, behind all these there is a Mastermind, which has now become part of our national conversation. Some ask me, ‘Who is this mastermind?’ and I say, ‘It is for you to research this. And you do know what it is, you know who it is.'”

“We Have To Look For The Mastermind In Jerusalem Where The Sons Of Israel Live”

The narrator then begins: “The Mastermind, whose roots go back thousands of years, who rules, burns, destroys, starves the world, creates wars, organizes revolutions and coups, establishes states within states – this ‘intellect’ is not only Turkey’s curse, but the curse of the entire world. Who is this mastermind? The answer is hidden inside truths and facts that can never be called conspiracy theories.

“This story begins in the very old days, 3,500 years ago, when Moses brought his people out of Egypt to Jerusalem. The only guide he had was the Ten Commandments. This is what was placed inside a wooden Ark which was later brought into the Temple of Solomon.

“This is not myth but fact. And we have to look for the mastermind in Jerusalem where the sons of Israel live.”

As They Destroy The World, The Jews Are Searching For The Ark Of The Covenant

Islamist pro-AKP political history professor Ramazan Kurtoglu says in the film that as they destroy the entire world, the Jews are searching for this Ark of Covenant that they lost. He ties the Iraq War to Jewish aspirations to find the Ark, and claims that the first thing that the Americans did when they entered Baghdad was to go Abu Ghuraib, at that time a museum and not yet a prison, and collect all the ancient stone tablets and papyri of ancient times.

The Jewish Faith Is A Political Philosophy, Not A Religion; Maimonides Envisioned “A New World Order… Ruled By The Children Of Israel”

The film’s narration says that the Jewish faith is a political philosophy rather than a religion, and mentions three figures that “the Jews look up to and follow” – naming “Rabbi Ben-Maimon (Maimonides), considered the greatest of all Bible commentators, who lived in the Middle Ages” who he says believed that “the Jews are the Masters, and all other people are to be their slaves.” The second, Charles Darwin, is “a Jew [sic], a biologist [and] a scientist who is the architect of the theory of evolution. The third is a German Jew, Leo Strauss, the father of American neo-conservatism.”

The%2BJewish%2BFaith%2BIs%2BA%2BPolitical%2BPhilosophy%2C%2BNot%2BA%2BReligion%3B%2BMaimonides%2BEnvisioned%2B'A%2BNew%2BWorld%2BOrder...%2BRuled%2BBy%2BThe%2BChildren%2BOf%2BIsrael'.jpg
Source: Youtube.com/watch?v=YPLslrRQ4Zs, accessed April 13, 2015

Prof. Kurtoglu states, “Maimonides envisioned a new world order in which the world would be ruled by the Children of Israel, God’s chosen people.”

The Jews Use Darwin’s Theory To Assert That God Created Them – But Everyone Else Evolved From Apes

Also appearing in the film is another pro-AKP academic, Ebubekir Sofuoglu, who says that the Jews believe that they, the descendants of Isaac, consider themselves the masters, and that “all of us,” the descendants of Ishmael, are created to serve the Jews. Sofuoglu also claims that the Jews used the Jew Darwin’s theory to assert their religious belief that God created the Jews while everyone else evolved from apes.

Islamist Journalists, AKP Officials: “Mastermind” Aims To Bring Down Turkey And Its Government

Also in the film, Islamist journalists and writers from the pro-AKP Islamist media, among them Yusuf Kaplan, Hasan Karakaya, Aydin Unal, Alper Tan, Prof. Hayrettin Karaman, Avni Ozgurel and others, in addition to government (AKP) officials, are shown giving their views of “the Mastermind” – whom they identify as “the Jews” as well as “the U.S.” (the latter of which the film earlier claims is dominated by the Jews). They blame them for both the destruction of the Ottoman Empire and for the coups in modern Turkey aimed at ousting Islamist leaders and parties.

Some of the journalists and officials depict the U.S. as a Zionist entity, while others claim that the U.S. is yet another country that is being controlled by a “Mastermind” lobby.

Advisor to Turkish Prime Minster Ahmet Davutoglu says in the film that what Erdogan is doing is bringing this entire story to people’s attention, and urging them to see the big picture. Erdogan, he says, wants recent events (the “operations” mentioned in his December 2014 speech) to be placed in this context – and for them to be seen as attempts by “a Mastermind” to bring down Turkey and its government.

Link: http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/8518.htm

Endnotes:
[1] By “these operations,” Erdogan was referring to the October 2014 delivery of Western aid to the Kurds in Kobani, Syria against Turkey’s objections; the 2013 Gezi mass protests; the December 2013 corruption probes against the AKP government; and activity by his former ally and current arch-enemy, the Fathullah Gulen Islamic movement.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

(Video) Ayaan Hirsi Ali Speaks after Viewing “Crossing The Line 2″


(Video) Ayaan Hirsi Ali Speaks after Viewing “Crossing The Line 2″

Posted: 16 Apr 2015 12:00 AM PDT

In this video Ayaan Hirsi Ali speaks at a recent screening of our film, Crossing the Line 2, a new documentary from Jerusalem U that reveals the rise of anti-Israel activity and anti-Semitic rhetoric on North American university campuses, and demonstrates when reasonable criticism of Israel ‘Crosses the Line’ into anti-Semitism.

Ayaan%2BHirsi%2BAli%2BSpeaks%2Bafter%2BViewing%2BCrossing%2BThe%2BLine%2B2.jpg
Jerusalem U..
12 April ’15..

Ayaan Hirsi Ali is a human rights activist, champion of free speech, and best-selling author. Time Magazine has listed her as one of the 100 most influential people in the world.

In this video she speaks at a recent screening of our film “Crossing The Line 2“, and she talks about about anti-Semitism on college campuses and discusses how criticism of Israel is often fueled by hatred of Jews.

Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pl41t5Fn2HI

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

James O’Keefe: They can stop one man, but they can’t stop us all


Going through a U.S. Port of entry Wednesday of the week a Customs and Border Patrol agent ques

Project Veritas
Going through a U.S. Port of entry Wednesday this week a Customs and Border Patrol agent questioned me “have you ever been arrested?”

“Yes,” I said.

“Do you think what you did was funny?”

“No,” I said, as my blood began to boil.

I wanted to say, “In fact, it’s very serious when one stands falsely accused, and when US Attorneys resign in disgrace for prosecutorial overreach and misconduct.” But I did not say that for reasons I will get into below.

“Are you done with all that stuff?” The agent said under his breath with a soulless bravado and without even looking me in the eye.

“Yes,” I said, even though I am just getting started with video journalism.

pv_site_image-417.png I have filed FOIA requests for each of the three detentions I have faced by customs agents in the last six months. Thanks to the good people at Judicial Watch, we received a response. The last one was almost entirely redacted. You can read that, here.

We speculate all of this is retaliation from DHS to our expose showing how easy it to evade border security; I dressed up like Osama Bin Laden in August and walked across a narrow tiny sliver of the Rio Grande, with no Border Patrol agents around. The undersecretary for DHS testified before Congress about how on earth that could happen.

“Why didn’t they stop James O’Keefe when he came across the Rio Grande River,” asked Senator McCain.

Francis X. Taylor, Under Secretary for the Department of Homeland Security, replied under oath, “I cannot answer that question.”

So the actual reasons why they couldn’t stop the man dressed like Bin Laden were, you could say, “redacted,” just like the information in our FOIA requests about my detentions.

Yesterday I was detained again (that’s two days in a row) going through customs en route to JFK. I was taken into a room and had my bags dumped out on the table. Usually they do this, but this time, the agent actually demanded the password to my phone that was locked, and preceded to inspect the contents of my iPhone. You could say, they were “tampering” with my phones. So why did I give them the password?

Refusing a consent search in my situation has consequences that affect other people now. I wish it was so simple, for me to miss an international flight available only once a day, miss fundraising meetings later, a speech and a previously scheduled important investigation stateside at Project Veritas to prove a point nobody will be able to see or hear. (In my case, if there’s no recording, it didn’t happen — an impossibly high standard, but that’s another story).

The federal government can manufacture reasons to arrest me all day long. I wanted to say things to Agent Diaz like “Does DHS target all journalists? Or just the ones you don’t like?” That would have just upset him and, based on previous experiences, landed me in a cell overnight. If you don’t believe it, read Breakthrough. I don’t have to make “all this stuff” up, Agent Diaz, I’ve lived it.

Others will ask, “Why didn’t you videotape it?” Well, my iTalk app recorder was on, until they asked to see my phone. Then I promptly turned the recording off. As you may recall in New Orleans I did videotape the entire episode, and when they found the cameras suddenly they started to shackle my waist, hands and legs. They then had me brought up on bogus felony charges, leaked my personal information to the press and the judge had my evidence destroyed, all before I could call my lawyer. The press didn’t give a damn. In fact, they celebrated the ordeal. The damage was done.

And I don’t know what’s more shocking, the fact all of this continues to happen because of my occupation, or the fact that my political opponents celebrate the retaliation — thinking whatever moniker is used to describe citizens reporting on government abuses (activist vs journalist) somehow justifies the government filing bogus charges against people they don’t like. Support for unjust retaliation probably says more about our critics than it does about our Government.

We live in constant fear of surveillance, constant fear of doing something that might upset powerful people, afraid to be out of line, almost all of us are afraid to speak up, donate to causes we believe in and some of us are even afraid to not conform, let alone rebel. It’s a fear I never understood, until they restricted my travel for four years and now throw my clothes on the floor every time I visit an airport. If and when my critics ever go through what I’ve been through, then I am willing to hear lectures about whether or not I should consent to a search from a federal agent.

These lessons and more have taught me the Government can stop one man. But they can’t stop us all.

I realize the best use of my time now, is not spending my nights in jail on principal, but rather spending my time recruiting and training 100 other young people who are not afraid, people like our college investigative journalist Laura.

Laura is willing to put it all on the line for a cause she believes in. She is jeopardizing her 4.0 GPA and honors degree because she’s not afraid of what her college will do to her. She only has one interest and that is exposing the truth. Her university has violated her due process rights, accusing her of “disruptive behavior” for doing a report on her university staff’s sympathy towards ISIS.

LauraButton.png So because the university faces external criticism, and the publicity was unpopular, Laura faces a Kangaroo Court where a Dean casts herself as a victim and accuses Laura of creating a “hostile,” “disruptive” work environment because she videotaped some interviews with staff. Then her own university seemed to assert jurisdiction over criminal matters and accused her of “violating the law,” even though Florida case law clearly spells out the opposite. The university hopes, like my DHS predicament, it’s “mission accomplished.” Put the student in a manifestly unfair and untenable position — until the will breaks and she bows down to the authority that supposedly holds her destiny in her hands. But they don’t know Laura. We do. Her will is unbreakable.

Laura is fighting for her due process rights, a revolutionary act in a time of student compliance and conformity. She has a hearing currently scheduled for Monday, April 20th and Project Veritas is doing everything we can to stand behind her so that she wins the day; and other truth seekers on college campuses are inspired to follow in her footsteps. I know many of them will be deterred if she does not graduate.

I don’t want to speak for Laura, but I don’t think she’ll mind me saying, in her heart, she realizes the principles at stake facing this country are more important to her than a college liberal arts diploma stamped by people running Kangaroo Courts and violating students’ due process rights.

Please consider making a small tax-deductible donation today to help us continue our important work.

I have been spending my airplane time reading the history of muckrakers from 100 years ago, including the autobiography of Lincoln Steffens. In 1904, during the time of his great endeavors for McClure Magazine which galvanized reform in cities across the country, Steffens wrote,

“Democracy with us may be impossible and corruption inevitable, but [this reporting], if it has proved nothing else, has demonstrated beyond doubt that we can stand the truth; that there is pride in the character of American citizenship; and that this pride may save us yet.”

I believe with my heart and soul that this type of journalism will ultimately galvanize citizens to do the right thing, and the powers that be to stand down, so long as we get behind citizens who are falsely accused and we unite together in supporting the rights of citizens to investigate and expose waste, fraud, abuse and dishonesty in order to make a more ethical and transparent society.

I urge you to stand with Laura; thank you for your support of Project Veritas.

JAMES

PROJECT VERITAS IS A 501(C)(3) CONTRIBUTIONS ARE TAX-DEDUCTIBLE.

1214 West Boston Post Road No. 156
Mamaroneck, NY 10543

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

NY Assembly Passes Late Term Abortion During All Nine Months


Assemblymen Sean Ryan and Crystal Peoples voted for a bill to approve late term and partial birth abortion. Will Senator Tim Kennedy also vote for this legalized murder? Do these people really represent the majority conscience of this community?

NY Assembly Okays Abortion During All Nine Months

April 07, 2015 by Laurel Recsetar

The New York State Assembly approved a bill that would codify a “right” to third trimester abortions. Right now, NY law does not specifically allow third trimester abortions, except when necessary to save the life of the mother. (Of course, we know from the Dublin Declaration that there are never cases where direct abortion is medically “necessary.”)

AB6221 adds a new “health” exception, stating that anything “relevant to the well-being of the patient” – including physical, emotional, psychological, and familial factors, and the mother’s age – is grounds for abortion. In other words, pretty much any reason at all.

For some indefensible reason, anti-lifers like to make a distinction between inside and outside the birth canal. Killing an unborn child inside the womb is just as much infanticide as killing a child outside the womb. We know that, but anti-lifers somehow don’t.

Someone please logically explain why an unborn child who is one day away from his due date can be shot in the heart with poison, but a new born baby can’t? Unless they want to explicitly defend infanticide, anti-lifers have some explaining to do.

Lori Kehoe, New York State Right to Life Director, told the Christian Post, “It is ridiculous that in 2015, with all the technology at our disposal, we are still arguing whether or not an eight month old baby in the womb deserves protection. It is doubtful that our descendants will look kindly upon this period in our history, when we fought for the right to dismember babies weeks, days and even minutes before birth.”

Unfortunately, this “health” exception already exists in every state. Doe v. Bolton, the companion case to Roe v. Wade, has a health exception that is so broad and vague it essentially allows abortion through all nine months of pregnancy.

Assembly member Deborah Glick, a chief sponsor of the bill, says “It guarantees a woman’s life and health can be protected.” Actually, what this bill guarantees is that New York would allow killing babies at any time during pregnancy, even if the Supreme Court overturned Roe.

Oh, and a side note to proponents of abortion who think access to abortion “empowers pregnant women” by giving them control over their reproductive systems: It doesn’t. It empowers doctors. What if a woman wants to keep her baby, but her doctor decides that her well-being is endangered by the pregnancy? In the eyes of the law, women do not determine the status of their own health or well-being, doctors do. Consequently, legal reproductive “rights” only give women a fleeting sense of choice…so long as their doctors agree with them.

It will be difficult for this bill to pass the Senate. But even if it fails this time, abortion lobbyists will consider the defeat only temporary. They will try again.

Josh Craddock, a spokesperson for Personhood USA, tells Prolife.Buzz, “It’s sad that in the abortion capital of the world, New York City, Democratic lawmakers are trying to increase the number of abortions later and later in pregnancy. Abortion always kills a human being, no matter what stage of pregnancy it is performed in.”

New York abortion lobbyists are pushing hard to pass Roe-like legislation at the state level. Why would they make such an effort, especially in a state as liberal as New York? They wouldn’t, unless they had a very real fear of seeing Roe overturned. Let their fear encourage pro-lifers that the fight is not in vain, and the defeat in Roe is indeed temporary.

Copyright © 2015 Carl Paladino, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this from Carl Paladino.

Our mailing address is:
Carl Paladino295 Main Street
Buffalo, NY 14203

open.php?u=0f0270f357b133ac8910c783a&id=ea71e3b4d9&e=2210c0cc7a

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

WAR PORN: Kurdish Rocket Sends ISIS Suicide Bomber Sky High – Exploding in MID-AIR


by Jason DeWitt | Top Right News
The plans of one ISIS militant to blow himself up went horribly wrong, turning into a circus act — and then a fireworks show — after one well-placed Kurdish rocket exploded beneath his vehicle.
As the ISIS thug approached Kurdish Peshmerga forces on the outskirts of Kirkuk, in Iraqi Kurdistan, fighters were able to target the suicide bomber before he managed to detonate his explosive cargo.
But the explosion didn’t just take out the terrorist — it split his vehicle, sending part of it — with him still inside — airborne, far into the air.
But he wasn’t done entertaining us yet.
As the Islamic creep was about to fall to Earth, his explosives finally detonated, and we are treated to a 4th of July treat a few months early.
Watch this incredible video below, without a doubt the most stunning we’ve seen from the battle against ISIS thus far:

READ MORE: http://toprightnews.com/kurdish-rocket-sends-isis-suicide-bomber-sky-high-exploding-in-mid-air/

I Want My Legacy To Be That They Know That They Screwed With The Wrong Guy — Andrew Breitbart

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Tell Congress to Kill the Death Tax


just-amac-header.jpg
AMAC – The Association of Mature American Citizens is now over 1,300,000 Members Strong!
AMAC – The Association of Mature American Citizens, 5 Orville Dr, Suite 400, Bohemia, NY 11716, USA
Kill the Death Tax
Hello AMAC Member,

ACTION ALERT: On Thursday, April 16, 2015, the U.S. House of Representatives will be voting to repeal the death tax permanently. As a strong supporter of H.R. 1105, the “Death Tax Repeal Act of 2015,” AMAC needs your help to ensure this bill is passed!

Death should not be a taxable event. Grieving families should not be forced to pay a tax on their loved one’s life savings, which were already taxed when the income was originally earned.

The death tax imposes substantial costs on small businesses and hard-working Americans. The death tax is responsible for closing the doors of many family farms and ranches and is the reason that more than 70 percent of family-owned businesses do not survive to the second generation.

Repealing the death tax will lead to increased economic activity and federal revenue. When owners are given the chance to reinvest in their businesses and hire more workers, the economy, the government, and the American people stand to benefit in the long run.

One thing is clear: Americans deserve better.

Please lend your voice to this significant debate by sending an email and/or calling your Representative. Tell your Congressman to stop government overreach by voting to repeal the death tax once and for all!

Send an Email to Your Congressman
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment