If you are a moslem and speak out against the islamists, you are slandered by other islamist moslems and their useful idiots…..
Islamic Principle of Taqiyyah or Holy Deception
While commenting on the Islamic practice of taqiyyah, the noted scholar Babu Suselan writes, “Under the Islamic concept of Al-Takkeya, it is legitimate for Muslims to lie, cheat, murder, deceive and violate non-Muslims. According to Takkeya, Muslims are sanctioned to communicate with fake sincerity. In reality, they may have just the opposite agenda in their hearts. It is clear that Islam permits the Muslims to lie anytime, anywhere to promote the cause of Islam.”
“Hudaibiya” – Islamic practice of LYING to Infidels! Hudaibiya is a truce Mohammad made with a certain Jewish tribe of Banu Quraizah, wherein Mohammad ORDERED Muslims to LIE to the Jews and say they renounced Islam so they could infiltrate as spies, and setup and ambush to break the truce.
After the battle of the Trench in 5 A.H. (627 C.E.), the Quraish did not give battle to the murderous band of the first Muslims that surrounded Mohammed at Medina. So Mohammed decided that it was time for him to launch a Jihad against the Quriash. He cleverly disguised this as a Hajj (a pre-Muslim pilgrimage to Mecca) that he wanted to perform in the season in the year 6 A.H. (628 C.E.). When Mohammed and his band of one thousand followers arrived at Hudaibiya near Mecca after taking an out of the way route, so as to evade being spotted by the Quraish, the Quraish got the shock of their lives. Mohammed the accursed wanting to storm the holiest of hly site of the (pre-Muslim) Arabs, on the pretext of Hajj. They sent an emissary (Urwa ibn Masud, who was the son-in law of Abu Sufyan, the leader of the Quraish) to him, asking him to desist from entering Mecca. This emissary went back and reported to the Quraish that Mohammed and his followers were in a rage and would invade Mecca, if they were not allowed into the town. e reported that they were fanatically committed to him, such that they do not let the water in which he bathes fall on the ground. They collect that water and venerate it. When he cuts his hair they collect his hair and treasure it (in fact strands of Mohammed alleged hair are worshipped – one instance is the Hazratbal Masjid in Indian Administered Kashmir). So the emissary returned to Mecca with these tidings.
Meanwhile Mohammed sent into Mecca for reconnaissance, one of his henchmen named Othman to check the defenses of Mecca. Othman also met the Quraish leaders to negotiate an entry for the Muslims and their gang leader Mohammed into Mecca , but they adopted delaying tactics. When Othman took long to come, a rumor got current in the Muslim camp that Othman had been killed by the Quraish. Thereupon all the Muslims took the pledge that they would fight against the Quraish to seek revenge for the murder of Othman. When the Muslims were poised to take up arms and attack Mecca, Othman returned to the Muslim camp with Suhail ibn Amr, an eminent citizen of Mecca, whom the Quraish sent to negotiate a treaty with the Muslims. This was the Treaty of Hudaibiya.
Here Mohammed ‘s craftiness comes to the fore. The terms of this treaty included that if any Muslim from the Quraish clan renounced Islam and returned to Mecca, then Mohammed would not hold any grudge against him and not ask for his return, but if any Quraish embraced Islam and went to medina, Mohammed would immediately return him to the Quriash at Mecca. Mohammed told Amr and the Quraish, that he bears no malice towards the Quriash and so he has offered this clause. The Quriash were taken for a ride in this clause, as they also believed that because of this clause no Quriash would embrace Islam, but some of Mohammed ‘s followers would leave Islam and return to Mecca. Actually this clause was a clever ruse of Mohammed, to infiltrate his spies into Mecca, while not allowing any spies from the Quriash to enter Medina. Over the next two years, many of Mohammed ‘s followers pretended to leave Islam and came and settled in Mecca, thus preparing for the eventual invasion of Mecca that was to take place in * A.H. (630 C.E.), when on a frivolous pretext, Mohammed abrogated that treaty and invaded Mecca.
The Treaty of Hudaibiya demonstrates in a very telling way, the evil genius that Mohammed was. And this character of his has been filtered down to the last Muslim, who uses it to cheat and trick non-Muslims in every small thing in day-to-day life. Pervez Musharraf the President of Pakistan, referred to this Treaty of Hudaibiya (and to the “justified” double-crossing that exists in it), when he announced after 9/11 that he was making a pact with America to fight the Taliban who then ruled Afghanistan and whose guest was that horror of all horrors Osama Bin Laden.
Mohammed’s pretext to abrogate the treaty of Hudaibiya
After signing the treaty, Mohammed started gathering allies for the final assault on Mecca. Alarmed at his moves, the Quraish also started building up their own alliances. In this scenario a tribe named Banu Bakr allied themselves with the Quraish and another named Banu Khuza’ah joined the camp of Mohammed. Incited by Mohammed the Banu Khuza’ah attacked a caravan of the Banu Bakr whereupon the Banu Bakr attacked the Banu Khuza’ah. This pretext was enough for Mohammed to send an ultimatum to the Quriash (whose allies were the Banu Bakr) giving the Quraish three alternatives. The first alternative was that the Banu Bakr and the Quraish should pay blood money for the victims of Banu Khuza’ah. The second alternative was that the Quraish should terminate their alliance with Banu Bakr. The third alternative was that the treaty of Hudaibiya should be considered to have been abrogated. In a fit of desperation, the Quraish replied that they would neither pay blood money, nor terminate their alliance with Banu Bakr. On this pretext, the wily Mohammed abrogated the Treaty of Hadaibiya and made preparations for a attack on Mecca.
InterFaith Forum criticizes Muslim hearing in House
Rev. Gordon Webster, left, chairman of the InterFaith Forum of Greater Rochester, and Muhammad Shafiq, imam of the Islamic Center of Rochester, sign an InterFaith statement on Friday.
A congressional hearing looking into the radicalization of American Muslims and how the Muslim community is responding wasn’t just an attack on Islam.
It was an attack on all religions and perhaps unconstitutional, said a group of religious leaders from the InterFaith Forum of Greater Rochester on Friday.
Speaking at a news conference at the Islamic Center of Rochester in Brighton, Forum leaders sharply criticized Thursday’s emotional and politically charged hearing on Capitol Hill.
Their message: Congress can do its part to protect national security without singling out a specific faith group.
“Violent extremism should be on the table — NOT Islam, and certainly not American Muslim youth,” said Forum chairperson Rev. Gordon V. Webster of Lake Avenue Baptist Church, reading from a one-page statement. “We support American Muslims who every day live as hardworking, law-abiding, responsible and faithful citizens of the United States.”
The statement, signed by 11 members in attendance, will be sent to Rep. Peter King, R-New York, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee.
“For me, it’s reaffirmation of our constitution’s First Amendment, religious freedom, and that’s what we display here, standing together as one religious community,” said Muhammad Shafiq, imam of the Islamic Center.
The InterFaith Forum of Rochester is composed of nearly 30 faiths.
“We’ve been working together in this community for 20 years to try and protect one another, and it’s not just Muslims, it’s Jews, Buddhists, Sikhs. It’s the Society of Friends, Mormons, Native Americans, African-Americans. It doesn’t matter what religious tradition or people, we don’t want to see them targeted just because of the community they were born in.”
Thursday’s hearing tore open wide an emotional and politically charged national debate raging since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, over whether U.S. Muslims do enough to combat terrorism or in fact incite it.
Witnesses, including some who claimed family members were seduced by Islamic extremists before committing terrorist acts on U.S. soil, testified while framed by photos of the burning World Trade Center and Pentagon.
King, who once stated that the vast majority of U.S. mosques were run by radicals, said Muslim community leaders need to speak out more loudly against terrorism and encourage cooperation with police and the FBI.
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas, said the hearing was a way to “castigate a whole broad base of human beings,” and that it played right into al-Qaeda’s hands, who could use it to turn more American Muslims against their country.
“Whatever happens here (to ridicule Islam), the extremists take that and make our lives very difficult. They will promote their own agenda,” Shafiq said.
Assertions made during the hearing that American Muslims don’t support American law enforcement in its efforts against terrorism is blatantly wrong, several Forum members said in Rochester on Friday. They cited a Duke University study that found the largest source of tips to police that prevent attacks come from American Muslims.
“We are here to help and cooperate,” Shafiq said of the Islamic Center. “We’ve met several times, here on this campus, and offsite (with authorities). We do our best in whatever we can do.”
Islamic Center member Sareer Fazly, an attorney, said the Muslim community in America has cooperated with law enforcement since even before 9/11.
He said Muslims are taught by the Quran to “follow the laws” of the land they live in.
“We’ve had numerous occasions where we’ve had episodes of infringement upon this right, or that right, but the communication to parishioners has always been: ‘Follow the law,” Fazly said.